Advertisement

Introduction

  • Ai Hui TanEmail author
  • Keith Richard Godfrey
Chapter
Part of the Advances in Industrial Control book series (AIC)

Abstract

A historical perspective of industrial applications of system identification is provided with a short review of early applications of system identification techniques to full-scale industrial processes and nuclear power plants. More recent applications of identification techniques in industry will feature in the remainder of this book, as the techniques are described. The role of signal design in identification for control is then expounded. Time domain and frequency domain specifications for the identification of linear systems are explained. Performance measures for linear system identification are discussed where two important measures are introduced, namely the performance index for perturbation signals and the effective minimum ratio between the actual amplitude and the specified amplitude at any of the specified harmonics. The identification framework is then extended to nonlinear systems where the concept of harmonic suppression is explained. Finally, a comparison between periodic and non-periodic signals is provided. Three types of commonly used non-periodic signals are discussed. It is shown that periodic signals offer many advantages over non-periodic ones. Nevertheless, non-periodic signals remain attractive choices particularly for preliminary tests due to them being easy to generate and apply.

References

  1. Barker HA, Godfrey KR (1999) System identification with multi-level periodic perturbation signals. Control Eng Pract 7:717–726CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Berezvai S, Kossa A, Bachrathy D, Stepan G (2018) Numerical and experimental investigation of the applicability of pellet impacts for impulse excitation. Int J Impact Eng 115:19–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Chang JA, Owen AG, Zaman M, Griffin AWJ (1968) Dynamic modelling of a four stand cold rolling steel mill using multilevel pseudo-random sequences. Meas Control 1:T80–T84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chook KC, Tan AH (2007) Identification of an electric resistance furnace. IEEE Trans Instrum Meas 56:2262–2270CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Darby ML, Nikolaou M (2012) MPC: Current practice and challenges. Control Eng Pract 20:328–342CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Godfrey KR (1969a) The theory of the correlation method of dynamic analysis and its application to industrial processes and nuclear power plant. Meas Control 2:T65–T72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Godfrey KR (1969b) Dynamic analysis of an oil-refinery unit under normal operating conditions. Proc Inst Electr Eng 116:879–888CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Godfrey KR, Barker HA, Tucker AJ (1999) Comparison of perturbation signals for linear system identification in the frequency domain. IEE Proc Control Theory Appl 146:535–548CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Godfrey KR, Tan AH, Barker HA, Chong B (2005) A survey of readily accessible perturbation signals for system identification in the frequency domain. Control Eng Pract 13:1391–1402CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Liu T, Gao F (2012) Industrial process identification and control design: step-test and relay-experiment-based methods. Springer, London, UKCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Lu W, Fisher DG (1989) Least-squares output estimation with multirate sampling. IEEE Trans Autom Control 34:669–672MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Makino K, Saito Y, Fons P, Kolobov AV, Nakano T, Tominaga J, Hase M (2016) Anisotropic lattice response induced by a linearly-polarized femtosecond optical pulse excitation in interfacial phase change memory material. Sci Rep 6: Article 19758Google Scholar
  13. Mayne DQ (2014) Model predictive control: recent developments and future promise. Automatica 50:2967–2986MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Mohanty S (2009) Artificial neural network based system identification and model predictive control of a flotation column. J Process Control 19:991–999CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Murphy DT, Southern A, Savioja L (2014) Source excitation strategies for obtaining impulse responses in finite difference time domain room acoustics simulation. Appl Acoust 82:6–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ng YH, Tan AH, Chuah TC (2011) Channel identification of concatenated fiber-wireless uplink using ternary signals. IEEE Trans Veh Technol 60:3207–3217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ng YH, Tan AH, Chuah TC (2016) Iterative channel estimation for multiuser fibre-wireless uplink exploiting semi-correlated ternary signals. IET Signal Proc 10:395–403CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Paolino DS, Geng H, Scattina A, Tridello A, Cavatorta MP, Belingardi G (2017) Damaged composite laminates: assessment of residual Young’s modulus through the impulse excitation technique. Compos B 128:76–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Pintelon R, Schoukens J (2012) System identification: a frequency domain approach. Wiley, Hoboken, NJCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Pinter SZ, Fernando XN (2010) Estimation and equalization of fiber-wireless uplink for multiuser CDMA 4G networks. IEEE Trans Commun 58:1803–1813CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Roinila T, Helin T, Vilkko M, Suntio T, Koivisto H (2009) Circular correlation based identification of switching power converter with uncertainty analysis using fuzzy density approach. Simul Model Pract Theor 17:1043–1058CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Schoukens J, Pintelon R, Rolain Y (2012) Mastering system identification in 100 exercises. Wiley, Hoboken, NJCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Schoukens J, Godfrey K, Schoukens M (2018) Nonparametric data-driven modeling of linear systems. IEEE Control Syst Mag 38:49–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Tan AH (2018) Multi-input identification using uncorrelated signals and its application to dual-stage hard disk drives. IEEE Trans Magn 54: Article 9300604CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Tan AH, Godfrey KR (2004) Modeling of direction-dependent processes using Wiener models and neural networks with nonlinear output error structure. IEEE Trans Instrum Meas 53:744–753CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Tan AH, Barker HA, Godfrey KR (2015) Identification of multi-input systems using simultaneous perturbation by pseudorandom input signals. IET Control Theory Appl 9:2283–2292MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Visacro S, Guimarães MB, Araujo LS (2013) Experimental impulse response of grounding grids. Electr Power Syst Res 94:92–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Xue S, Yang X, Li Z, Gao H (2018) An approach to fault detection for multirate sampled-data systems with frequency specifications. IEEE Trans Syst, Man, and Cybern: Syst 48:1155–1165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Yang C-C (2008) Optical CDMA fiber radio networks using cyclic ternary sequences. IEEE Commun Lett 12:41–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of EngineeringMultimedia UniversityCyberjayaMalaysia
  2. 2.School of EngineeringUniversity of WarwickCoventryUK

Personalised recommendations