Advertisement

Integrating Minds: Blending Methods in The King Is Alive and Twelfth Night

  • Nicholas R. Helms
Chapter
Part of the Cognitive Studies in Literature and Performance book series (CSLP)

Abstract

Through Levring and Jensen’s The King Is Alive and Shakespeare’s Twelfth Night, Helms discuss two ways to integrate inference and imagination. The King Is Alive—an appropriation of King Lear—exemplifies a story where inference frames strongly imaginative character building. Twelfth Night illustrates how inference and imagination might be integrated through Mark Johnson’s theory of conceptual blending: in the case of Duke Orsino, inference and imagination can blend together to produce ambiguity and surprise. A reading of Orsino could be wholly imaginative (focusing on his melancholy) or wholly inferential (focusing on his social role and authority as Duke). When Orsino threatens to kill Cesario in the final act, these two interpretations suddenly combine into one via conceptual blending, the combination of discrete inputs into a coherent, gestalt-like whole.

Bibliography

  1. Cartelli, Thomas, and Katherine Rowe. “Surviving Shakespeare: Kristian Levring’s The King Is Alive.” Borrowers and Lenders: The Journal of Shakespeare and Appropriation 1, no. 2 (2005).Google Scholar
  2. Cook, Amy. Shakespearean Neuroplay: Reinvigorating the Study of Dramatic Texts and Performance Through Cognitive Science. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2010.Google Scholar
  3. Crane, Mary Thomas. Shakespeare’s Brain: Reading with Cognitive Theory. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2001.Google Scholar
  4. Damassio, Antonio. The Feeling of What Happens: Body and Emotion in the Making of Consciousness. New York: Harcourt Brace and Co., 1999.Google Scholar
  5. Drouin, Jennifer. “Cross-Dressing, Drag, and Passing: Slippages in Shakespearean Comedy.” In Shakespeare Re-Dressed: Cross-Gender Casting in Contemporary Performance, edited by James C. Bulam, 23–56. Madison: Farleigh Dickinson University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
  6. Fauconnier, Gilles, and Mark Turner. The Way We Think: Conceptual Blending and the Mind’s Hidden Complexities. New York: Perseus Books, 2002.Google Scholar
  7. Goldman, Alvin. Simulating Minds: The Philosophy, Psychology, and Neuroscience of Mindreading. New York: Oxford University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
  8. Goldman, Alvin I., and Frederique de Vignemont. “Is Social Cognition Embodied?” Trends in Cognitive Sciences 13, no. 4 (April 2009): 154–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Helms, Nicholas R. “‘Where She Comes From’: Mindreading in Levring’s The King Is Alive”. symplokē 19, no. 1–2 (2011): 289–304.Google Scholar
  10. ———. “Conceiving Ambiguity: Dynamic Mindreading in Shakespeare’s Twelfth Night.” Philosophy and Literature 36, no. 1 (April 2012): 122–35.Google Scholar
  11. Jess-Cooke, Carolyn. “‘The Promised End’ of Cinema: Portraits of Cinematic Apocalypse in 21st Century Shakespearean Cinema.” Literature Film Quarterly 34, no. 2 (2006): 161–68.Google Scholar
  12. Lakoff, George, and Mark Johnson. Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2003.Google Scholar
  13. Levring, Kristina, and Anders Thomas Jensen. The King Is Alive. Directed by Kristian Levring. Produced by IFC, 2000.Google Scholar
  14. McConachie, Bruce. Engaging Audiences: A Cognitive Approach to Spectating in the Theatre. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2008.Google Scholar
  15. ———. Evolution, Cognition, and Performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015.Google Scholar
  16. Nunn, Trevor, dir. Twelfth Night. Fine Line Features, 1996.Google Scholar
  17. Oatley, Keith. “Simulation of Substance and Shadow: Inner Emotions and Outer Behavior in Shakespeare’s Psychology of Character.” College Literature 33, no. 1 (2006): 15–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Oxford English Dictionary Online. Oxford University Press. Last Modified June 2018.Google Scholar
  19. Ponech, Trevor. “The Reality of Fictive Cinematic Characters.” In Shakespeare and Character: Theory, History, Performance, and Theatrical Persons, edited by Paul Yachnin, and Jessica Slights, 41–61. New York: Palgrave, 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Scott-Douglass, Amy. “Dogme Shakespeare 95: European Cinema, Anti-Hollywood Sentiment, and the Bard.” In Shakespeare, the Movie II: Popularizing the Plays on Film, TV, Video, and DVD, edited by Richard Burt, and Lynda E. Boose, 252–63. London: Routledge, 2003.Google Scholar
  21. Shakespeare, William. King Lear. Edited by R.A. Foakes. Surrey: Arden Shakespeare, 1997.Google Scholar
  22. ———. Twelfth Night, or What You Will. Edited by Keir Elam. London: Arden Shakespeare, 2008.Google Scholar
  23. Spivey, Michael. The Continuity of Mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
  24. Stanislavski, Constantin. An Actor Prepares. Translated by Elizabeth Reynolds Hapgood. New York: Routledge, 1989.Google Scholar
  25. Stueber, Karsten. Rediscovering Empathy: Agency, Folk Psychology, and the Human Sciences. London: MIT Press, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Turner, Mark. The Literary Mind: The Origins of Thought and Language. New York: Oxford University Press, 1996.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nicholas R. Helms
    • 1
  1. 1.University of AlabamaTuscaloosaUSA

Personalised recommendations