Reading the Mind: Cognitive Science and Close Reading

  • Nicholas R. Helms
Part of the Cognitive Studies in Literature and Performance book series (CSLP)


Helms enters the debate about the usefulness of character criticism, joining critics such as Michael Bristol, Jessica Slights, and Paul Yachnin in arguing for a criticism that considers characters as if they were real people living in recognizable worlds. Mindreading is the human ability to look at a person or a literary character and contemplate what that person is thinking, feeling, and planning. Drawing particularly on the work of Simon Baron-Cohen and Alvin Goldman, Helms reviews contemporary cognitive science and the philosophy of mind to identify two methods of mindreading: inference (the theory-theory of mindreading) and imagination (the simulation theory of mindreading). Helms adds to this conversation by applying cognitive science to discussions of character in Shakespeare’s The Rape of Lucrece.


  1. Arkin, Samuel. “‘That Map Which Deep Impression Bears’: Lucrece and the Anatomy of Shakespeare’s Sympathy.” Shakespeare Quarterly 64, no. 3 (Fall 2013): 349–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baines, Barbara J. “Effacing Rape in Early Modern Representation.” ELH 65, no. 1 (1998): 69–98.Google Scholar
  3. Baron-Cohen, Simon. Mindblindness: An Essay on Autism and Theory of Mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1995.Google Scholar
  4. Barr, Dale J., and Boaz Keysar. “Mindreading in an Exotic Case: The Normal Adult Human.” In Other Minds: How Humans Bridge the Divide Between Self and Other, edited by Bertram F. Malle and Sara D. Hodges, 271–83. New York: Guilford Press, 2005.Google Scholar
  5. Belsey, Catherine. “Tarquin Dispossessed: Expropriation and Consent in The Rape of Lucrece.” Shakespeare Quarterly 52, no. 3 (Fall 2001): 315–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bradley, A.C. Shakespearean Tragedy: Lectures on Hamlet, Othello, King Lear, and Macbeth. UK: Penguin Books, 1991. First published in 1904.Google Scholar
  7. Bristol, Michael D. “How Many Children Did She Have?” In Philosophical Shakespeares, edited by John J. Joughin, 18–33. New York: Routledge, 2000.Google Scholar
  8. ———. “Confusing Shakespeare’s Characters with Real People: Reflections on Reading in Four Questions.” In Shakespeare and Character: Theory, History, Performance, and Theatrical Persons, edited by Paul Yachnin and Jessica Slights, 21–40. New York: Palgrave, 2009.Google Scholar
  9. ———. “How Dark Was It in That Room? Performing a Scene Shakespeare Never Wrote.” In Shakespeare’s Sense of Character: On the Page and from the Stage, edited by Yu Jin Ko and Michael W. Shurgot, 19–34. Surrey: Ashgate, 2012.Google Scholar
  10. Cook, Amy. Shakespearean Neuroplay: Reinvigorating the Study of Dramatic Texts and Performance Through Cognitive Science. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2010.Google Scholar
  11. Doherty, Martin J. Theory of Mind: How Children Understand Others’ Thoughts and Feelings. New York: Psychology Press, 2009.Google Scholar
  12. Fahmi, Mustapha. “Quoting the Enemy: Character, Self-Interpretation, and the Question of Perspective in Shakespeare.” In Shakespeare and Moral Agency, edited by Michael Bristol, 129–41. New York: Continuum, 2010.Google Scholar
  13. Goldman, Alvin I. Simulating Minds: The Philosophy, Psychology, and Neuroscience of Mindreading. New York: Oxford University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
  14. ———. Joint Ventures: Mindreading, Mirroring, and Embodied Cognition. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.Google Scholar
  15. Gopnik, Alison. “How We Know Our Minds: The Illusion of First-Person Knowledge of Intentionality.” Behavioral and Brain Sciences 16 (1993): 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hogan, Patrick Colm. Cognitive Science, Literature, and the Arts: A Guide for Humanism. New York: Routledge, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Jackson, Frank. “All That Can Be at Issue in the Theory-Theory Simulation Debate.” Philosophical Papers 28, no. 2 (1999): 77–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Jacobson, Miriam. “The Elizabethan Cipher in Shakespeare’s Lucrece.” Studies in Philology 107, no. 3 (Summer 2010): 336–59.Google Scholar
  19. Knights, L.C. “How Many Children Had Lady Macbeth?” In “Hamlet” and Other Shakespearean Essays. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1979. First published in 1933.Google Scholar
  20. Lomazzo, Giovanni Paolo. A Tracte Containing the Artes of Curious Painting. Oxford, 1598: Early English Books Online.Google Scholar
  21. Lyne, Raphael. Shakespeare, Rhetoric and Cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011.Google Scholar
  22. Maus, Katharine Eisaman. Inwardness and Theater in the English Renaissance. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1995.Google Scholar
  23. McConachie, Bruce. Engaging Audiences: A Cognitive Approach to Spectating in the Theatre. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2008.Google Scholar
  24. Meek, Richard. “Ekphrasis in The Rape of Lucrece and The Winter’s Tale.” SEL Studies in English Literature 1500–1900, 46, no. 2 (Spring 2006): 389–14.Google Scholar
  25. ———. “‘O, What a Sympathy of Woe Is This’: Passionate Sympathy In Titus Andronicus.” In Shakespeare Survey 66, edited by Peter Holland, 287–97. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013.Google Scholar
  26. Montaigne, Michel de. The Complete Essays of Montaigne. Translated by Donald M. Frame. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1965.Google Scholar
  27. Morton, Adam. Frames of Mind: Constraints on the Common-Sense Conception of the Mental. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1980.Google Scholar
  28. Nussbaum, Martha. Upheavals of Thought: The Intelligence of Emotions. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2001.Google Scholar
  29. O’Dair, Sharon. “On the Value of Being a Cartoon, in Literature and in Life.” In Harold Bloom’s Shakespeare, edited by Christy Desmet and Robert Sawyer, 81–96. New York: Palgrave, 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Oxford English Dictionary Online. Oxford University Press. Last Modified June 2018.Google Scholar
  31. Palmer, Alan. Fictional Minds. Lincoln: University of Nebraska, 2004.Google Scholar
  32. ———. Social Minds in the Novel. Columbus: Ohio State University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
  33. Ponech, Trevor. “The Reality of Fictive Cinematic Characters.” In Shakespeare and Character: Theory, History, Performance, and Theatrical Persons, edited by Paul Yachnin and Jessica Slights, 41–61. New York: Palgrave, 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Richardson, Alan. The Neural Sublime: Cognitive Theories and Romantic Texts. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
  35. Schoenfeldt, Michael. “Shakespearean Pain.” In Shakespearean Sensations, edited by Tanya Pollard and Katharine Craik, 191–207. Cambridge University Press, 2013.Google Scholar
  36. Shakespeare, William. Macbeth. Edited by Kenneth Muir. London: Arden Shakespeare, 1962.Google Scholar
  37. ———. The Rape of Lucrece: Shakespeare’s Poems. Edited by Katherine Duncan-Jones and H.R. Woudhuysen. London: Arden Shakespeare, 2007.Google Scholar
  38. Vermeule, Blakey. Why Do We Care About Literary Characters? Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
  39. Weaver, William P. “‘O Teach Me How to Make Mine Own Excuse’: Forensic Performance in Lucrece.” Shakespeare Quarterly 59, no. 4 (Winter 2008): 421–49.Google Scholar
  40. Yachnin, Paul, and Jessica Slights, eds. “Introduction.” Shakespeare and Character: Theory, History, Performance, and Theatrical Persons. New York: Palgrave, 2009.Google Scholar
  41. Zunshine, Lisa. Why We Read Fiction: Theory of Mind and the Novel. Columbus: Ohio State University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
  42. ———, ed. Introduction to Cognitive Cultural Studies. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2010.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nicholas R. Helms
    • 1
  1. 1.University of AlabamaTuscaloosaUSA

Personalised recommendations