Advertisement

Environmental Motivations Behind Individuals’ Daily Energy Saving Behaviour: Evidence from Germany, The Netherlands and Belgium

  • Vladimir Udalov
Chapter
Part of the SpringerBriefs in Climate Studies book series (BRIEFSCLIMATE)

Abstract

The impact of environmental motivations on the individual’s decisions regarding the adoption of energy-saving habits are analysed on the basis of a representative online survey carried out in Belgium, Germany and the Netherlands. Various daily energy-saving activities are considered. Accounting for endogeneity in the basic estimation model, the subject’s experience with extreme weather events are used as an instrument for environmental motivations. This study provides empirical evidence that apart from the Belgian sub-sample, where environmental motivations are either nonsignificant or even decrease the probability of performing daily energy-saving behaviour, almost all types of daily-energy saving behaviours are positively associated with environmental motivations among the German and Dutch respondents. The findings suggest that policy programmes aimed at raising environmental awareness and forming pro-environmental motivations can lead to an increase in daily energy-saving activities in Germany and the Netherlands.

Keywords

Environmental behaviour Energy-saving behaviour Instrumental variable approach Environmental motivation Extreme whether events Survey 

References

  1. Abrahamse, W. and Steg, L., 2009. “How do socio-demographic and psychological factors relate to households’ direct and indirect energy use and savings?” Journal of Economic Psychology 30, 711–720.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Abrahamse, W., Steg, L., Vlek, C. and Rothengatter, T., 2005. “A review of intervention studies aimed at household energy conservation.” Journal of Environmental Psychology 25, 273–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Angrist, J. D. and Krueger, A. B., 2001. “Instrumental Variables and the Search for Identification: From Supply and Demand to Natural Experiments.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 15 (4), 69–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bamberg, S., 2003. “How does environmental concern influence specific environmentally related behaviors? A new answer to an old question.” Journal of Environmental Psychology 23, 21–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brody, S. D., Zahran, S., Vedlitz, A. and Grover, H., 2008. “Examining the Relationship between Physical Vulnerability and Public Perceptions of Global Climate Change in the United States.” Environment and Behavior 40 (1), 72–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brounen, D., Kok, N. and Quigley, J. M., 2012. “Energy literacy, awareness, and conservation behavior of residential households.” Energy Economics 38, 42–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Carlsson-Kanyama, A., Linden, A.-L. and Ericsson, B., 2005. “Residential energy behaviour: does generation matter?” International Journal of Consumer Studies 29, 239–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dai, J., Kesternich, M., Löschel, A. and Ziegler, A., 2014. “Do Chinese individuals believe in global climate change and why? An econometric analysis.” Joint Discussion Paper Series in Economics, 28.Google Scholar
  9. Dexter, L. A., 1964. “Communications—Pressure, Influence or Education?” In: Dexter, L. A., White, D. M. (Eds.), People, Society and Mass Communications. Collier MacMillan Ltd., London.Google Scholar
  10. Dillman, D. A., Rosa, E. A. and Dillman, J. J., 1983. “Lifestyle and home energy conservation in the United States: the poor accept lifestyle cutbacks while the wealthy invest in conservation.” Journal of Economic Psychology 3, 299–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. EEA, 2010. “Annual report 2010 and Environmental statement 2011.” European Environmental Agency.Google Scholar
  12. EG, 1987. “Single European Act.” Official Journal of the European Communities 169/1.Google Scholar
  13. Egan, P. J. and Mullin, M., 2012. ‘Turning Personal Experience into Political Attitudes: The Effect of Local Weather on Americans’ Perceptions about Global Warming.’ Journal of Politics 74(3), 796–809.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. EIA, 2016. “International Energy Outlook 2016.” Independent Statistics & Analysis.Google Scholar
  15. Ek, K. and Söderholm, P., 2010. “The devil is in the details: Household electricity saving behavior and the role of information.” Energy Policy 38(3), 1578–1587.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Eriksson, L., Garvill, J. and Nordlund, A. M., 2006. “Acceptability of travel demand management measures: the importance of problem awareness, personal norm, freedom, and fairness.” Journal of Environmental Psychology 26(1), 15–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. European Commission 2013. “The 7th Environmental Action Programme”, Official Journal of the European Union 354/171.Google Scholar
  18. Eurostat, 2013. “Manual for statistics on energy consumption in households.” European Union, Luxembourg.Google Scholar
  19. Fischer, C., 2008. “Feedback on household electricity consumption: a tool for saving energy?” Energy Efficiency 1, 79–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Frederiks, E. R., Stenner, K. and Hobman, E. V., 2015. “Household energy use: Applying behavioural economics to understand decision-making and behaviour.” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 41, 1385–1394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gardner, G. T. and Stern, P. C., 1996. “Environmental Problems and Human Behavior.” Boston: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
  22. Gatersleben, B., Steg, L. and Vlek, C., 2002. “Measurement and determinants of environmentally significant consumer behavior.” Environment and Behavior 34, 335–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Guerin, D. A., Yust, B. L. and Coopet, J. G., 2000. “Occupant Predictors of Household Energy Behavior and Consumption Change as Found in Energy Studies Since 1975.” Family and Consumer Sciences Research Journal 29(1), 48–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Henryson, J., Hakansson, T. and Pyrko, J., 2000. “Energy efficiency in buildings through information – Swedish perspective.” Energy Policy 28, 169–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Jansson, J., Marell, A. and Nordlund, A., 2010. “Green consumer behaviour: determinants of curtailment and eco-innovation adoption.” Journal of Consumer Marketing 27(4), 358–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kaiser, F. G., Wolfing, S. and Fuhrer, U., 1999. “Environmental attitude and ecological behaviour.” Journal of Environmental Psychology 19, 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lee, E., Park, N.-K. and Han, J. H., 2013. “Gender difference in environmental attitude and behaviors in adoption of energy-efficient lighting at home.” Journal of Sustainable Development 6(9), 36–50.Google Scholar
  28. Leiserowitz, A., Maibach, E., Roser-Renouf, C., Feinberg, G. and Howe, P., 2012. “Extreme weather and global climate change in the American mind”, Yale University and George Mason University, New Haven, CT, Yale Project on Global Climate Change Communication.Google Scholar
  29. Leiserowitz, A., Maibach, E., Roser-Renouf, C., Feinberg, G., Rosenthal, S., Marlon, J. and Howe, P., 2014. “Extreme weather and global climate change in the American mind.”, Yale University and George Mason University, New Haven, CT, Yale Project on Global Climate Change Communication.Google Scholar
  30. Ménioux, J. and Zumsteeg, S., 2012. “Individual perceptions of climate risks: SURVEY AXA/IPSOS.”Google Scholar
  31. Nejat, P., Jomehzadeh, F., Taheri, M. M., Gohari, M. and Majid, M. Z. A., 2015. “A global review of energy consumption, CO 2 emissions and policy in the residential sector (with an overview of the top ten CO 2 emitting countries).” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 43, 843–862.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Nordlund, A. M. and Garvill, J., 2003. “Effects of values, problem awareness, and personal norm on willingness to reduce personal car use.” Journal of Environmental Psychology 23, 339–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Poortinga, W., Steg, L., Vlek, C. and Wiersma, G., 2003. “Household preferences for energy-saving measures. A Conjoint Analysis.” Journal of Economic Psychology, 24, 49–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Rassen, J. A., Schneeweiss, S., Glynn, R. J., Mittleman, M. A. and Brookhart, M. A., 2009. “Instrumental variable analysis for estimation of treatment effects with dichotomous outcomes.” American Journal of Epidemiology 169(3), 273–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Roodman, D., 2011. “Fitting fully observed recursive mixed-process models with cmp.” Stata Journal, StataCorp LP 11(2), 159–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Sabatini, F., 2012. “Who Trusts Berlusconi? An Econometric Analysis of the Role of Television in the Political Arena.” Kyklos 65, 111–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Sardianou, E., 2007. “Estimating energy conservation patterns of Greek households.” Energy Policy 35, 3778–3791.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Ščasný, M. and Urban, J., 2009. “Residential energy efficiency: a cross country empirical analysis.” Paper prepared for the OECD Conference on Household Behaviour and Environmental Policy. OECD Environment Directorate. Paris.Google Scholar
  39. Stern, P. C., 1992. “Psychological Dimensions of Global Environmental Change.” Annual Review of Psychology 43, 269–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Stern, P. C., 2000. “Toward a coherent theory of environmentally significant behavior.” Journal of Social Issues 56 (3), 407–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Stern, P. and Gardner, G., 1981. “Psychological research and energy policy.” American Psychologist 36 (4), 329–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Stern, P. C., Dietz, T. and Guagnano, G. A., 1995. “The new ecological paradigm in social psychological context.” Environment and Behavior 27, 723–743.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Stern, P. C., Dietz, T., Abel, T., Guagnano, G. A. and Kalof, L., 1999. “A value-belief-norm theory of support for social movements: The case of environmentalism.” Research in Human Ecology 6(2), 81–97.Google Scholar
  44. Tsushima, S., Tanabe, S. and Utsumi, K., 2014. “Worker’s awareness and indoor environmental quality in electricity-saving offices.” Building and Environment, 1–10.Google Scholar
  45. Urban, J. and Ščasný, M., 2012. “Exploring domestic energy-saving: The role of environmental concern and background variables.” Energy Policy 47, 69–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Weidner, H., 1995. “25 years of modern environmental policy in Germany: Treading a well-worn path to the top of the international field”, WZB Discussion Paper, FS II, 95–301.Google Scholar
  47. Whitmarsh, L., 2008. “Are flood victims more concerned about global climate change than other people? The role of direct experience in risk perception and behavioral response.” Journal of Risk Research 11 (3), 351–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Whitmarsh, L., 2009. “Behavioural responses to climate change: Asymmetry of intentions and impacts.” Journal of Environmental Psychology 29, 13–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Windahl, S. and Signitzer, B., 1992. “Using Communication Theory. An Introduction to Planned Communication.” Sage Publications, London.Google Scholar
  50. Zografakis, N., Sifaki, E., Pagalou, M., Nikitaki, G., Psarakis, V. and Tsagarakis, K. P., 2010. “Assessment of public acceptance and willingness to pay for renewable energy sources in Crete.” Renewable Sustainable Energy Review 14(3), 1088–1095.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Vladimir Udalov
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Business and EconomicsUniversity of WuppertalWuppertalGermany

Personalised recommendations