Exploring Secondary Teacher Statistical Learning: Professional Learning in a Blended Format Statistics and Modeling Course
Providing opportunities for secondary teachers to develop the statistical, technological, and pedagogical facility necessary to successfully engage their students in statistical inquiry is nontrivial. Many mathematics and science teachers in the U.S. have not benefitted from sufficient opportunity to learn statistics in a sense-making manner. With statistics assuming a more prominent place in the secondary curriculum, it remains a priority to consider viable ways in which to reach and support the statistical learning trajectory of both pre- and in-service teachers. This study explores ways in which a course that blends face-to-face and virtual learning experiences impacted in-service teachers’ technological pedagogical statistical knowledge (TPSK) Results suggest the course positively impacted participants’ TPSK.
KeywordsBlended learning Professional development Statistics Teaching
This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No. 1136392. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.
- Australian Curriculum Assessment and Reporting Authority. (2010). Australian curriculum consultation portal. Retrieved from http://www.australiancurriculum.edu.au/Home.
- College Board. (2015). Advanced placement biology: Course and exam description. Retrieved from https://secure-media.collegeboard.org/digitalServices/pdf/ap/ap-biology-course-and-exam-description.pdf.
- Conference Board of the Mathematical Sciences. (2010). The mathematical education of teachers II (Vol. 17). Providence, RI: American Mathematical Society.Google Scholar
- Fendel, D., Resek, D., Alper, L., & Fraser, S. (2012). Interactive mathematics program. Emeryville, CA: Key Curriculum Press.Google Scholar
- Finzer, W. (2005). Fathom 2TM dynamic data software. Emeryville, CA: Key Curriculum Press.Google Scholar
- Franklin, C., Kader, G., Bargagliotti, A., Scheaffer, R., Case, C., & Spangler, D. (2015). Statistical education of teachers. Retrieved from American Statistical Association: http://www.amstat.org/asa/files/pdfs/EDU-SET.pdf.
- Franklin, C., Kader, G., Mewborn, D., Moreno, J., Peck, R., Perry, M., et al. (2007). Guidelines for assessment and instruction in statistics education (GAISE) report: A Pre-K-12 curriculum framework. Alexandria, VA: American Statistical Association.Google Scholar
- Groth, R. E. (2007). Toward a conceptualization of statistical knowledge for teaching. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 38(5), 427–437.Google Scholar
- Hirsch, C. R., Fey, J. T., Hart, E. W., Schoen, H. L., & Watkins, A. E. (2015). Core-plus mathematics: Contemporary mathematics in context. Columbus, OH: McGraw-Hill Education.Google Scholar
- Kadijevich, D. M., & Madden, S. R. (2015). Comparing approaches for developing TPCK. In: New directions in technological and pedagogical content knowledge research: Multiple perspectives (pp. 125–146): Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar
- Keller, S. (2006). CPMP-tools. East Lansing, MI: Michigan State University and Core-plus mathematics project.Google Scholar
- Konold, C., & Miller, C. (2005). TinkerplotsTM dynamic data exploration. Emeryville, CA: Key Curriculum Press.Google Scholar
- Lappan, G., Fey, J. T., Fitzgerald, W. M., Friel, S., & Phillips, B. (2009). Connected mathematics 2. Boston, MA: Pearson.Google Scholar
- Lee, H. S., & Hollebrands, K. (2011). Characterizing and developing teachers’ knowledge for teaching statistics with technology. In C. Batanero, G. Burrill, & C. Reading (Eds.), Teaching statistics in school mathematics—Challenges for teaching and teacher education: A joint ICMI/IASE study (pp. 359–369). Springer.Google Scholar
- Lee, H. S., & Nickell, J. (2014). How a curriculum may develop technological statistical knowledge: A case of teachers examining relationships among variables using Fathom. In Paper presented at the Sustainability in Statistics Education. Ninth International Conference on Teaching Statistics (ICOTS9), Flagstaff, AZ.Google Scholar
- Madden, S. R. (2008). High school mathematics teachers’ evolving understanding of comparing distributions. Dissertation. Kalamazoo, MI: Western Michigan University.Google Scholar
- Meyer, O., & Lovett, M. (2014). Using Carnegie Mellon’s open learning initiative (ODI) to support the teaching of introductory statistics: Experiences, assessments, and lessons learned. Paper presented at the International Conference on Teaching Statistics 9, Flagstaff, AZ.Google Scholar
- National Governors Association Center for Best Practices & Council of Chief State School Officers. (2010). Common core state standards for mathematics. Washington, DC: Authors.Google Scholar
- National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: The National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.Google Scholar
- National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2009). Focus in high school mathematics: Reasoning and sense making. Reston, VA: The National Council of Teachers of Mathematics Inc.Google Scholar
- National Research Council (2013). Next generation science standards: For states, by states. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/18290.
- Papert, S. (1991). Situating constructionism. In I. Harel & S. Papert (Eds.), Constructionism (pp. 1–12). Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corporation.Google Scholar
- Shaughnessy, J. M. (2007). Research on statistics learning and reasoning. In J. F. K. Lester Jr. (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (Vol. 2, pp. 957–1010). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar