Advertisement

Crimilegal Order: What’s Behind a Term?

  • Markus Schultze-Kraft
Chapter

Abstract

The crimilegal order is an ideal-type of a hybrid political order characterised by the blurring of the moral, normative and social boundaries between (formal) legality-legitimacy, on the one hand, and illegality-illegitimacy and criminality-morality on the other. This characterisation of crimilegal orders is developed based on a critical discussion of Weber’s notion of the rational-legal order and the—questionable—idea that in modern political orders legitimacy always flows from legality. Insights drawn from the literatures on legal pluralism, neopatrimonialism, fragile statehood and hybrid political orders further substantiate the concept of the crimilegal order, which is broken down into the consolidated and contested crimilegal order and contrasted with the consolidated and contested rational-legal order.

Keywords

Crimilegal order Crimilegality-crimilegitimacy spectrum Hybrid political order Legality Legitimacy Morality 

References

  1. Bach, Daniel, and Mamadou Gazibo. Neopatrimonialism in Africa and Beyond. Oxford: Routledge, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bechle, Karsten. “Neopatrimonialism in Latin America: Prospects and Promises of a Neglected Concept.” GIGA Working Papers No. 153, 2010. Accessed August 8, 2018. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/6494466.pdf.
  3. Bewley-Taylor, David. “Drug Trafficking and Organized Crime in Afghanistan: Corruption, Insecurity and the Challenges of Insecurity.” The RUSI Journal 158, no. 6 (2013): 6–17.  https://doi.org/10.1080/03071847.2013.869719.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Boege, Volker, Anne Brown, Keving Clements, and Anna Nolan. On Hybrid Political Orders and Emerging States: What Is Failing—States in the Global South or Research and Politics in the West? Berlin: Berghof Research Centre for Constructive Conflict Management, 2009. Accessed August 8, 2018. https://www.berghof-foundation.org/fileadmin/redaktion/Publications/Handbook/Dialogue_Chapters/dialogue8_boegeetal_lead.pdf.
  5. Bratton, Michael, and Nicolas Van de Walle. “Neopatrimonial Regimes and Political Transitions in Africa.” World Politics 46, no. 4 (1994): 453–89.  https://doi.org/10.2307/2950715.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Briscoe, Ivan, and Pamela Kalkman. The New Criminal Powers. The Spread of Illicit Links to Politics Across the World and How It Can Be Tackled. CRU Report. The Hague: Clingendael Institute, 2016. Accessed August 8, 2018. https://www.clingendael.org/sites/default/files/pdfs/the_new_criminal_powers.pdf.
  7. Brock, Lothar, Hans-Henrik Holm, Georg Sorensen, and Michael Stohl. Fragile States. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2012.Google Scholar
  8. Comaroff, Jean, and John Comaroff, “Law and Disorder in the Postcolony.” Social Anthropology 15, no. 2 (2007): 133–52.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0964-0282.2007.00010.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. ———. “Reflections on the Anthropology of Law, Governance and Sovereignty.” In Rules of Law and Laws of Ruling: On the Governance of Law, edited by Franz von Benda-Beckmann, Keebet von Benda-Beckmann, and Julia Eckert, 31–59. Surrey: Ashgate, 2009.Google Scholar
  10. Dahrendorf, Ralf. Law and Order. London: Stevens & Sons, 1985.Google Scholar
  11. Dyzenhaus, David. “The Legitimacy of Legality.” The University of Toronto Law Journal 46, no. 1 (1996): 129–80.  https://doi.org/10.2307/825889.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. ———. Legality and Legitimacy: Carl Schmitt, Hans Kelsen, and Hermann Heller in Weimar. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1997.Google Scholar
  13. Ellis, Stephen, and Mark Shaw. “Does Organized Crime Exist in Africa?” African Affairs 114, no. 457 (2015): 505–28.  https://doi.org/10.1093/afraf/adv035.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Erdmann, Gero, and Ulf Engel. “Neopatrimonialism Reconsidered: Critical Review and Elaboration of an Elusive Concept.” Commonwealth & Comparative Politics 45, no. 1 (2007): 95–119.  https://doi.org/10.1080/14662040601135813.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Friedman, Lawrence M. “Coming of Age: Law and Society Enters an Exclusive Club.” Annual Review of Law and Social Science 1 (2005): 1–16.  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.lawsocsci.1.041604.115951.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Fukuyama, Francis. State Building. Governance and World Order in the Twenty-First Century. London: Profile Books, 2005.Google Scholar
  17. ———. The Origins of Political Order: From Prehuman Times to the French Revolution. London: Profile Books, 2011.Google Scholar
  18. ———. Political Order and Political Decay: From the Industrial Revolution to the Globalisation of Democracy. London: Profile Books, 2014.Google Scholar
  19. Ghani, Ashraf, and Clare Lockhart. Fixing Failed States: A Framework for Rebuilding a Fractured World. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
  20. Gillies, Allan. “Theorizing State-Narco Relations in Bolivia’s Nascent Democracy (1982–1993): Governance, Order and Political Transition.” Third World Quarterly 39, no. 4 (2018): 727–46.  https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2017.1374839.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Griffiths, John. “What Is Legal Pluralism?” The Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law 18, no. 24 (1986): 1–55.  https://doi.org/10.1080/07329113.1986.10756387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Jurow, Keith. “Untimely Thoughts: A Reconsideration of the Origins of Due Process of Law.” The American Journal of Legal History 19, no. 4 (1975): 265–79.  https://doi.org/10.2307/845053.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kraushaar, Maren, and Daniel Lambach. “Hybrid Political Orders: The Added Value of a New Concept.” Occasional Papers Series, The Australian Centre for Peace and Conflict Studies, 2009.Google Scholar
  24. Lübbe, Weyma. Legitimität kraft Legalität. Sinnverstehen und Institutionenanalyse bei Max Weber und seinen Kritikern. Tübingen: J.C.B. Mohr (Paul Siebeck), 1991.Google Scholar
  25. Maurer, Andrea. Herrschaft und soziale Ordnung. Kritische Rekonstruktion und Weiterführung der individualistischen Theorietradition. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag, 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Mayntz, Renate. Illegal Markets: Boundaries and Interfaces Between Legality and Illegality. Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies Discussion Paper 16/4, 2016. Accessed August 8, 2018. http://www.mpi-fg-koeln.mpg.de/pu/mpifg_dp/dp16–4.pdf.
  27. Mehring, Reinhard. Carl Schmitt zur Einführung. Hamburg: Junius, 2001.Google Scholar
  28. Méndez, Juan E., Guillermo O’Donnell, and Paulo Sérgio Pinheiro, eds. The (Un)Rule of Law & the Underprivileged in Latin America. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 1999.Google Scholar
  29. Merry, Sally. “Legal Pluralism.” Law & Society Review 22, no. 5 (1988): 869–96.  https://doi.org/10.2307/3053638.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Messner, J. J., ed. Fund for Peace Fragile States Index 2018. Washington, DC: Fund for Peace, 2018.Google Scholar
  31. Netelenbos, Benno. Political Legitimacy Beyond Weber: An Analytical Framework. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. North, Douglass, John Wallis, and Barry Weingast. Violence and Social Orders. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009.Google Scholar
  33. O’Donnell, Guillermo. “Afterword.” In The Judicialization of Politics in Latin America, edited by Rachel Sieder, Line Schjolden, and Alan Angell, 293–98. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2005.Google Scholar
  34. Pitcher, Anne, Mary H. Moran, and Michael Johnston. “Rethinking Patrimonialism and Neopatrimonialism in Africa.” African Studies Review 52, no. 1 (2009): 125–56.  https://doi.org/10.1353/arw.0.0163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Remmer, Karen. “Neopatrimonialism: The Politics of Military Rule in Chile, 1973–1987.” Comparative Politics 21, no. 2 (1989): 149–70.  https://doi.org/10.2307/422042.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Reno, William. “Illicit Commerce in Peripheral States.” In Crime and the Global Political Economy, edited by Richard Friman, 67–84. London: Lynne Rienner, 2009a.Google Scholar
  37. ———. “Understanding Criminality in West African Conflicts.” International Peacekeeping 16, no. 1 (2009b): 47–61.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13533310802485542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Risse, Thomas. “Governance in Areas of Limited Statehood: Introduction and Overview.” In Governance Without a State? Policies and Politics in Areas of Limited Statehood, edited by Thomas Risse, 1–38. New York: Columbia University Press, 2011.Google Scholar
  39. Schmitt, Carl. Legalität und Legitimität. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, 1932.Google Scholar
  40. Schultze-Kraft, Markus. Getting Real About an Illicit ‘External Stressor’: Transnational Cocaine Trafficking Through West Africa. IDS Evidence Report No. 72. Brighton: Institute of Development Studies, 2014. Accessed August 8, 2018. https://opendocs.ids.ac.uk/opendocs/handle/123456789/3966.
  41. ———. “Órdenes crimilegales: repensando el poder político del crimen organizado.” Íconos. Revista de Ciencias Sociales 55 (2016): 25–44.  https://doi.org/10.17141/iconos.55.2016.1899.
  42. ———. “Understanding Organised Violence and Crime in Political Settlements: Oil Wars, Petro-Criminality and Amnesty in the Niger Delta.” Journal of International Development 29, no. 5 (2017): 613–27.  https://doi.org/10.1002/jid.3287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. ———. “Making Peace in Seas of Crime: Crimilegal Order and Armed Conflict Termination in Colombia.” Crime, Law and Social Change 69, no. 4 (2018): 475–96.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10611-017-9759-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Sieder, Rachel. “Legal Cultures in the (Un)Rule of Law: Indigenous Rights and Juridification in Guatemala.” In Cultures of Legality: Judicialization and Political Activism in Latin America, edited by Javier Couso, Alexandra Huneeus, and Rachel Sieder, 161–81. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
  45. ———. “Subaltern Cosmopolitan Legalities and the Challenges of Engaged Ethnography.” Universitas Humanística 75 (2013): 221–49.Google Scholar
  46. Sousa Santos, Bonaventura de. “A Map of Misreading: Toward a Postmodern Conception of Law.” Journal of Law and Society 14, no. 3 (1987): 279–302.  https://doi.org/10.2307/1410186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Trubek, David M. “Max Weber on Law and the Rise of Capitalism.” Faculty Scholarship Series Paper 4001, 1972. Accessed August 8, 2018. http://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=4993&context=fss_papers.
  48. Van de Walle, Nicolas. “The Path from Neopatrimonialism: Democracy and Clientelism in Africa Today.” Working Paper Series 3-07, Mario Einaudi Centre for International Studies, Cornell University, 2007. Accessed August 8, 2018. https://einaudi.cornell.edu/sites/default/files/The%20Path%20from%20Neopatrimonialism_Democracy%20and%20Clientelism%20in%20Africa%20Today.pdf.
  49. Watts, Michael. “Petro-Insurgency or Criminal Syndicate? Conflict & Violence in the Niger Delta.” Review of African Political Economy 34, no. 114 (2007): 637–60.  https://doi.org/10.1080/03056240701819517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Weber, Max. “Politics as a Vocation.” In Essays in Sociology, edited by Hans Heinrich Gerth and Charles Wright Mills, 26–45. New York: Macmillan, 1919/1946.Google Scholar
  51. ———. Economy and Society. Edited by Guenther Roth and Claus Wittich. Berkeley, Los Angeles, and London: University of California Press, 1922/1978.Google Scholar
  52. ———. World Development Report 2017. Washington, DC: World Bank, 2017.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Markus Schultze-Kraft
    • 1
  1. 1.Universidad IcesiCaliColombia

Personalised recommendations