Strategic Design

  • Jan-Erik JohansonEmail author


Johanson expounds the strategy formation as planning oriented activity. Public and private organisations share many common themes in their strategic planning efforts. There are also marked differences between private enterprises and public agencies. There are number of caveats for strategic design within public agencies such as the enforced strategy, strategy as an entity and double-bind strategies.


Strategic planning Politics Organizational processes Caveats of planning 


  1. Alexander, L. D. (1989). Successfully implementing strategic decisions. In D. Asch & C. Bowman (Eds.), Readings in strategic management (pp. 388–396). London: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Andrews, R., Boyne, G. A., Law, J., & Walker, R. M. (2009). Strategy formulation, strategy content and performance: An empirical analysis. Public Management Review, 11(1), 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barzelay, M., & Jacobsen, A. S. (2009). Theorizing implementation of public management policy reforms: A case study of strategic planning and programming in the European Commission. Governance, 22(2), 319–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bellò, B., & Spano, A. (2015). Governing the purple zone: How politicians influence public managers. European Management Journal, 33(5), 354–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Berry, F. S. (1994). Innovation in public management: The adoption of strategic planning. Public Administration Review, 54(4), 322–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Berry, F. S., & Wechsler, B. (1995). State agencies’ experience with strategic planning: Findings from a national survey. Public Administration Review, 55(2), 159–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Boyne, G., & Gould-Williams, J. (2003). Planning and performance in public organizations an empirical analysis. Public Management Review, 5(1), 115–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Boyne, G. A., & Walker, R. M. (2010). Strategic management and public service performance: The way ahead. Public Administration Review, 70, 185–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Boyne, G. A., Gould-Williams, J. S., Law, J., & Walker, R. M. (2004). Problems of rational planning in public organizations: An empirical assessment of the conventional wisdom. Administration & Society, 36(3), 328–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bryson, J. M. (2010). The future of public and nonprofit strategic planning in the United States. Public Administration Review, 70, 255–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bryson, J. M., & Roering, W. D. (1987). Applying private-sector strategic planning in the public sector. Journal of the American Planning Association, 53(1), 9–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bryson, J. M., Berry, F. S., & Yang, K. (2010). The state of public strategic management research: A selective literature review and set of future directions. The American Review of Public Administration, 40(5), 495–521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cepiku, D., Giordano, F., & Savignon, A. B. (2018). Does strategy rhyme with austerity? Public Management Review, 20(3), 421–443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Clark, B. R. (1998). The entrepreneurial university: Demand and response. Tertiary Education and Management, 4(1), 5–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Demir, T., & Nyhan, R. C. (2008). The politics—Administration dichotomy: An empirical search for correspondence between theory and practice. Public Administration Review, 68(1), 81–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. di Francesco, M., & Alford, J. (2016). Budget rules and flexibility in the public sector: Towards a taxonomy. Financial Accountability & Management, 32(2), 232–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Donaldson, T., & Preston, L. (1995). The stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts, evidence, and implications. Emmitsburg: National Emergency Training Centre.Google Scholar
  18. Ellison, B. (2006). Bureaucratic politics as agency competition: A comparative perspective. International Journal of Public Administration, 29(13), 1259–1283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Floyd, S. W., & Lane, P. J. (2000). Strategizing throughout the organization: Managing role conflict in strategic renewal. Academy of Management Review, 25(1), 154–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Freeman, R. E. (1984). Stakeholder management: A stakeholder approach. Marshfield, MA: Pitman Publishing.Google Scholar
  21. Freeman, R. E., Wicks, A. C., & Parmar, B. (2004). Stakeholder theory and “the corporate objective revisited”. Organization Science, 15(3), 364–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Furrer, O., Thomas, H., & Goussevskaia, A. (2008). The structure and evolution of the strategic management field: A content analysis of 26 years of strategic management research. International Journal of Management Reviews, 10(1), 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hendrick, R. (2003). Strategic planning environment, process, and performance in public agencies: A comparative study of departments in Milwaukee. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 13(4), 491–519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hood, C. (2011). The blame game: Spin, bureaucracy, and self-preservation in government. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Johnsen, Å. (2005). What does 25 years of experience tell us about the state of performance measurement in public policy and management? Public Money and Management, 25(1), 9–17.Google Scholar
  26. Johnson, G., & Scholes, K. (2001). Exploring public sector strategy. Harlow, UK and New York: Financial Times and Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  27. Kissler, G. R., Fore, K. N., Jacobson, W. S., Kittredge, W. P., & Stewart, S. L. (1998). State strategic planning: Suggestions from the Oregon experience. Public Administration Review, 58, 353–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. McGivern, G., Currie, G., Ferlie, E., Fitzgerald, L., & Waring, J. (2015). Hybrid manager-professionals’ identity work: The maintenance and hybridization of medical professionalism in managerial contexts. Public Administration, 93(2), 412–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Miles, R. E., Snow, C. C., Meyer, A. D., & Coleman JR, H. J. (1978). Organizational strategy, structure, and process. Academy of Management Review, 3(3), 546–562.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Mintzberg, H. (1994). The rise and fall of strategic planning. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  31. Mintzberg, H., & Waters, J. (1985). Of strategies, deliberate and emergent. Strategic Management Journal, 6(3), 257–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Moe, T. (1989). The politics of bureaucratic structure. In J. Chubb & P. Peterson (Eds.), Can the government govern? (pp. 267–329). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
  33. Noordegraaf, M. (2006). Professional management of professionals. In J. Duyvendak, T. Knijn, & M. Kremer (Eds.), Policy, people and the professional (pp. 181–193). Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Noordegraaf, M. (2015). Hybrid professionalism and beyond: (New) forms of public professionalism in changing organizational and societal contexts. Journal of Professions and Organization, 2(2), 187–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Nutt, P., & Backoff, R. (1992). Strategic management of public and third sector organizations: A handbook for leaders. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  36. Poister, T. H. (2003). Measuring performance in public and nonprofit organizations. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  37. Poister, T. H. (2010). The future of strategic planning in the public sector: Linking strategic management and performance. Public Administration Review, 70, 246–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Poister, T., Pitts, D., & Hamilton E. (2010). Strategic management research in the public sector: A review, synthesis, and future directions. The American Review of Public Administration, 40(5), 522–545.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Porter, M. E. (1980). Competitive strategy: Techniques for analyzing industries and competitors. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  40. Porter, M. E. (2010). What is value in health care? New England Journal of Medicine, 363(26), 2477–2481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Porter, M. E., & Teisberg, E. O. (2006). Redefining health care: Creating value-based competition on results. Boston: Harvard Business Press.Google Scholar
  42. Provan, K., & Milward, B. (1999). Do networks really work? A framework for evaluating public sector organizational networks. In Academy of Management Proceedings (pp. A1–A6). Academy of Management.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Quinn, J. B. (1980). An incremental approach to strategic change. The McKinsey Quarterly, 16(4), 34–52.Google Scholar
  44. Starbuck, W. H., & Nystrom, P. C. (1981). Designing and understanding organizations. Handbook of Organizational Design, 1, 9–22.Google Scholar
  45. Thompson, E. P. (1970). Warwick University Ltd.: Industry, management and the universities. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  46. University of Warrick. (2018). History Homepage of University of Warrick. Available: Last updated 3 September 2018.
  47. Wheeland, C. M. (1993). Citywide strategic planning: An evaluation of Rock Hill’s empowering the vision. Public Administration Review, 53, 65–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Whittington, R. (2006). Completing the practice turn in strategy research. Organization Studies, 27(5), 613–634.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Whittington, R. (2007). Strategy practice and strategy process: Family differences and the sociological eye. Organization Studies, 28(10), 1575–1586.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Wolf, C., & Floyd, S. W. (2017). Strategic planning research: Toward a theory-driven agenda. Journal of Management, 43(6), 1754–1788.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Wooldridge, B., & Floyd, S. W. (1990). The strategy process, middle management involvement, and organizational performance. Strategic Management Journal, 11(3), 231–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of TampereTampereFinland

Personalised recommendations