Strategy Formation in Public Agencies

  • Jan-Erik JohansonEmail author


Johanson deals with the alternative ways of categorising strategy in public agencies. Strategic design, internal strategic scanning and strategic governance capture the essence of micro-level strategies within government agencies. These strategy modes differ from one another in terms of temporal orientation, the role of the managerial control, the position of the professions and the primary type of capital.


Strategic design Internal strategic scanning Strategic governance 


  1. Abbott, A. (2014). The system of professions: An essay on the division of expert labor. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  2. Adler, P., & Kwon, S. (2002). Social capital: Prospects for a new concept. The Academy of Management Review, 27(1), 17–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Alford, J. (2001). The implications of ‘publicness’ for strategic management theory. In G. Johnson & K. Scholes (Eds.), Exploring public sector (pp. 1–16). Harlow: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  4. Barkdoll, G., & Bosin, M. R. (1997). Targeted planning: A paradigm for the public service. Long Range Planning, 30(4), 476–539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Barney, J., & Hesterly, W. (1999). Organizational economies, understanding the relationship between organizations and economic analysis. In S. Clegg & C. Hardy (Eds.), Studying organization: Theory and method (pp. 109–141). London: Sage.Google Scholar
  7. Barney, J., Wright, M., & Ketchen, D. (2001). The resource-based view of the firm: Ten years after 1991. Journal of Management, 27(6), 625–641.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bass, B. (1998). Transformational leadership: Industrial, military and educational impact. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  9. Becker, G. (1993). Human capital: A theoretical and empirical analysis, with special reference to education. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Becker, M. C. (2004). Organizational routines: A review of the literature. Industrial and Corporate Change, 13(4), 643–678.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Blau, P. (1974). On the nature of organizations. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  12. Borgatti, S. P., & Foster, P. C. (2003). The network paradigm in organizational research: A review and typology. Journal of Management, 29(6), 991–1013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bryson, J. (1995). Strategic planning for public and nonprofit organizations: A guide to strengthening and sustaining organizational achievement. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  14. Bunning, C. (1992). Effective strategic planning in the public sector: Some learnings. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 5(4), 54–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Burt, R. (1992). Structural holes: The social structure of competition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Carmeli, A., & Tishler, A. (2004). The relationships between intangible organizational elements and organizational performance. Strategic Management Journal, 25(13), 1257–1278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Carter, N. (1989). Performance indicators: ‘Backseat driving’ or ‘hands off’ control? Policy and Politics, 17(2), 131–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Castells, M. (1996). The rise of the network society. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  19. Chaffee, E. (1985). Three models of strategy. The Academy of Management Review, 10(1), 89–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Clegg, S., Courpasson, D., & Phillips, N. (2006). Power and organizations. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  21. Colin, S. (2000). Accountability in the regulatory state. Journal of Law & Society, 27(1), 38–61.Google Scholar
  22. Das, T., & Teng, B. (2000). A resource-based theory of strategic alliances. Journal of Management, 26(1), 31–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Donaldson, T., & Preston, L. (1995). The stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts, evidence, and implications. Emmitsburg: National Emergency Training Centre.Google Scholar
  24. Dunleavy, P. (1989). The architecture of the British Central State, part I: Framework for analysis. Public Administration, 67(3), 249–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Dunsire, A., Hood, C., & Huby, M. (2010). Cutback management in public bureaucracies: Popular theories and observed outcomes in Whitehall. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Dyer, J., & Sing, H. (1998). The relational view: Cooperative and sources of interorganizational competitive advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23(4), 660–679.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Emery, F., & Trist, E. (1965). The causal texture of organizational environments. Human Relations, 18(1), 21–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Etzioni, A. (1986). Mixed scanning revisited. Public Administration Review, 46(1), 8–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Floyd, S. W., & Lane, P. J. (2000). Strategizing throughout the organization: Managing role conflict in strategic renewal. Academy of Management Review, 25(1), 154–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Flynn, N. (2009). Public sector management. London, Los Angeles and New Delhi: Sage.Google Scholar
  31. Goold, M., Pettifer, D., & Young, D. (2001). Redesigning the corporate centre. European Management Journal, 19(1), 83–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Gortner, H., Mahler, J., & Nicholson, J. B. (1997). Organization theory: A public perspective. Fort Worth: Harcourt Brace College.Google Scholar
  33. Grandori, A. (1997). Governance structures, coordination mechanisms and cognitive models. Journal of Management and Governance, 1(1), 29–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Grant, R. (1991). Contemporary analysis: Concepts, techniques, applications. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  35. Harlow, C. (2006, February). Global Administrative Law: The quest for principles and values. European Journal of International Law, 17(1), 187–214.Google Scholar
  36. Hjern, B., & Porter, D. (1981). Implementation structures: A new unit of administrative analysis. Organization Studies, 2(3), 211–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Hogwood, B., & Gunn, L. (1984). Policy analysis for the real world. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  38. Horwitz, A. (1990). The logic of social control. New York: Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Johanson, J. E., & Vakkuri, J. (2017). Governing hybrid organisations: Exploring the variety of institutional life. Abingdon: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Johanson, J. E. (2009). Strategy formation in public agencies. Public Administration, 87(4), 872–891.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Joyce, P. (1999). Strategic management for the public services. Buckingham and Philadelphia, PA: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  42. Kaufmann, F., Majone, G., & Ostrom, V. (1986). Guidance, control, and evaluation in the public sector: The Bielefeld interdisciplinary project. Berlin and New York: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  43. Kersbergen, K. V., & Waarden, F. V. (2004). “Governance” as a bridge between disciplines: Cross-disciplinary inspiration regarding shifts in governance and problems of governability, accountability and legitimacy. European Journal of Political Research, 43(2), 143–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Koteen, J. (1997). Strategic management in public and nonprofit organizations: Managing public concerns in an era of limits. Westport, CT: Praeger.Google Scholar
  45. Krause, G. A., & Douglas, J. W. (2006). Does agency competition improve the quality of policy analysis? Evidence from OMB and CBO fiscal projections. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management: The Journal of the Association for Public Policy Analysis and Management, 25(1), 53–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Lane, J. (1993). The public sector: Concepts, models and approaches. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  47. Lindblom, C. (1979). Still muddling, not yet through. Public Administration Review, 39(6), 517–526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Lipsky, M. (1971). Street-level bureaucracy and the analysis of urban reform. Urban Affairs Review, 6(4), 391–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Llewellyn, S., & Tappin, E. (2003). Strategy in the public sector: Management in the wilderness. Journal of Management Studies, 40(4), 955–982.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Lockett, A., & Thompson, S. (2004). Edith Penrose’s contributions to the resource-based view: An alternative perspective. Journal of Management Studies, 41(1), 193–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Luhmann, N. (1995). Social systems. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  52. Lyden, F., & Miller, E. (1982). Public budgeting: Program planning and implementation. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  53. Lynn, L. (2009). Public management: Old and new. New York and London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  54. Macdonald, K. M. (1995). The sociology of the professions. London and Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  55. Mahoney, J. (2005). Economic foundations of strategy. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  56. Mahoney, J., & Pandian, J. (1992). The resource-based view within the conversation of strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 13(5), 363–380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Mintzberg, H. (1994). The rise and fall of strategic planning. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  58. Mintzberg, H., Ahlstrand, B., & Lampel, J. (1998). Strategy safari: A guided tour through the wilds of strategic management. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  59. Moore, M. (1995). Creating public value: Strategic management in government. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  60. Nahapiet, J., & Ghoshal, S. (1998). Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. The Academy of Management Review, 23(2), 242–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Naschold, F., & Lahtonen, M. (1995). The modernisation of the public sector in Europe: A comparative perspective on the Scandinavian experience: Evaluation report. Helsinki: Ministry of Labour. Google Scholar
  62. Nelson, R., & Winter, S. (2002). Evolutionary theorizing in economics. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 16(2), 23–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Niskanen, W. (1971). Bureaucracy and representative government. Chicago: Aldine-Atherton.Google Scholar
  64. Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The knowledge-creating company: How Japanese companies create the dynamics of innovation. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  65. Nutt, P., & Backoff, R. (1992). Strategic management of public and third sector organizations: A handbook for leaders. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  66. OECD. (2001). Financial management and control of public agencies. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  67. O’Neill, P., & Sohal, A. S. (1999). Business process reengineering a review of recent literature. Technovation, 19(9), 571–581.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Penrose, E. T. (1952). Biological analogies in the theory of the firm. The American Economic Review, 42(5), 804–819.Google Scholar
  69. Penrose, E. T. (1960). The growth of the firm a case study: The Hercules Powder Company. Business History Review, 34(1), 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Peters, B. G. (2001). The future of governing. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.Google Scholar
  71. Petty, R., & Guthrie, J. (2000). Intellectual capital literature review measurement, reporting and management. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 1(2), 155–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Pollitt, C. (2003). Joined-up government: A survey. Political Studies Review, 1(1), 34–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Pollitt, C., Talbot, C., Caulfield, J., & Smullen, A. (2005). Agencies: How governments do things through semi-autonomous organizations. Basingstoke: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Porter, M. (1980). Competitive: Techniques for analyzing industries and competitors. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  75. Prahalad, C., & Hamel, G. (1990). The core competence of corporation. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Reprint.Google Scholar
  76. Quinn, B. J. (1980). Strategic change: ‘Logical incrementalism’. MIT Sloan Management Review, 30(4), 45.Google Scholar
  77. Rabin, J., Miller, G., & Hildreth, W. (2000). Handbook of strategic management. New York: M. Dekker.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Rittel, H. W., & Webber, M. M. (1974). Wicked problems. Man-Made Futures, 26(1), 272–280.Google Scholar
  79. Rugman, A. M., & Verbeke, A. (2002). Edith Penrose’s contribution to the resource-based view of strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 23(8), 769–780.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Rumelt, R. (1991). How much does industry matter? Strategic Management Journal, 12(3), 167–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Sahlin-Andersson, K. (2006). Beyond project management: New perspectives on the temporary permanent dilemma. Malmö: Liber.Google Scholar
  82. Sanchez, R., & Heene, A. (1997). Reinventing strategic management: New theory and practice for competence-based competition. European Management Journal, 15(3), 303–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Scholes, K., & Johnson, G. (2001). Exploring public sector. Harlow, UK and New York: Financial Times and Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  84. Seetharaman, A., Sreenivasan, J., & Boon, L. P. (2006). Critical success factors of total quality management. Quality & Quantity, 40(5), 675–695.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Soltani, E., van der Meer, R., Williams, T. M., & Lai, P. (2006). The compatibility of performance appraisal systems with TQM principles—Evidence from current practice. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 26(1), 92–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Spencer, B. A. (1994). Models of organization and total quality management: A comparison and critical evaluation. The Academy of Management Review, 19(3), 446–471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Stern, J. (2000). Electricity and telecommunications regulatory institutions in small and developing countries. Utilities Policy, 9(3), 131–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Teisman, G. R., & Klijn, E. (2002). Partnership arrangements: Governmental rhetoric or governance scheme? Public Administration Review, 62(2), 197–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Thompson, G. (2003). Between hierarchies and markets: The logic and limits of network forms of organization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science (New York, N.Y.), 185(4157), 1124–1131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Vinzant, J. C., & Vinzant, D. H. (1996). Strategic management and total quality management: Challenges and choices. Public Administration Quarterly, 20, 201–219. Google Scholar
  92. Weggeman, M. (1989). Is the professional self-managing or is there really a need for professional management? European Management Journal, 7(4), 422–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Wettenhall, R. (2005). Agencies and non-departmental public bodies—The hard and soft lenses of agencification theory. Public Management Review, 7(4), 615–636.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. White, L. (2001). ‘Effective governance’ through complexity thinking and management science. Systems Research and Behavioral Science: The Official Journal of the International Federation for Systems Research, 18(3), 241–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Whittington, R. (1993). What is strategy and does it matter? London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  96. Williamson, O. (2000). The new institutional economics: Taking stock, looking ahead. Journal of Economic Literature, 38(3), 595–613.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Wilson, J. Q. (1989). Bureaucracy: What government agencies do and why they do it. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  98. Wooldridge, B., & Floyd, S. W. (1990). The process, middle management involvement, and organizational performance. Strategic Management Journal, 11(3), 231–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of TampereTampereFinland

Personalised recommendations