Advertisement

Policy Making in Government

  • Jan-Erik JohansonEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

Johanson identifies the most important parts of the society. Economy deals with the market exchange, polity is preoccupied with regulating the society, and civil society enables continuous patterns of interaction among citizens. The difficulties of governing societies might originate from the problems within one area of society or from the incompatibility of parts. The separation of politics and administration is one of the most important features dictating the capacity of the government.

Keywords

Public administration Politics-Administration Market economy Civil society 

References

  1. Aberbach, J., Putnam, R., & Rockman, B. (1981). Bureaucrats and politicians in western democracies. Cambridge, MA and London: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Alford, J., Hartley, J., Yates, S., & Hughes, O. (2017). Into the purple zone: Deconstructing the politics/administration distinction. The American Review of Public Administration, 47(7), 752–763.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bertelsmann Stiftung. (2008). Bertelsmann transformation index 2008. Gütersloh: Verlag Bertelsmann Stiftung.Google Scholar
  4. Boettke, P. J., & Storr, V. H. (2002). Post-classical political economy: Polity, society and economy. In Weber, Mises and Hayek. American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 61(1), pp. 161–191. Google Scholar
  5. Chandler, A. D. (1984). The emergence of managerial capitalism. Business History Review, 58(4), 473–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Coleman, J. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. The American Journal of Sociology, 94(Suppl.), 95–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Coppedge, M., Lindberg, S., Skaaning, S., & Teorell, J. (2016). Measuring high level democratic principles using the V-Dem data. International Political Science Review, 37(5), 580–593.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dahlström, C., & Lapuente, V. (2017). Organizing leviathan: Politicians, bureaucrats, and the making of good government. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dahlström, C., Lapuente, V., & Teorell, J. (2011). Dimensions of bureaucracy II: A cross-national dataset on the structure and behaviour of public administration (QoG Working Paper Series, 6). Gothenburg.Google Scholar
  10. Deeg, R. (2009). The rise of internal capitalist diversity? Changing patterns of finance and corporate governance in Europe. Economy and Society, 38(4), 552–579.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Deeg, R., & Jackson, G. (2006). Towards a more dynamic theory of capitalist variety. Socio-Economic Review, 5(1), 149–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Defourny, J., & Nyssens, M. (2014). The EMES approach of social enterprise in a comparative perspective. In J. Defourny, L. Hhulgård, & V. Pestoff, (Eds.), Social enterprise and the third sector: Changing European landscapes in a comparative perspective (pp. 42–65). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  13. Ertman, T. (2005). Building states—Inherently a long-term process? An argument from comparative history. In M. Lange & D. Rueschemeyer (Eds.), States and development (pp. 165–182). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fukuyama, F. (1995). Social capital and the global economy. Foreign Affairs, 74(5), pp. 89–103. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fukuyama, F. (2013). What is governance? Governance, 26(3), 347–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Granovetter, M. S. (1973). The strength of weak ties. The American Journal of Sociology, 78(6), 1360–1380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Granovetter, M. (1985). Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology, 91(3), 481–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hall, P., & Soskice, D. (2001). Varieties of capitalism: The institutional foundations of comparative advantage. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hancké, B., Rhodes, M., & Thatcher, M. (2007). Beyond varieties of capitalism: Conflict, contradictions, and complementarities in the European economy. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
  20. Heidenheimer, A. J. (1986). Politics, policy and policey as concepts in English and continental languages: An attempt to explain divergences. The Review of Politics, 48(1), 3–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hjerppe, R. (1997). Sosiaalinen pääoma–tutkimisen arvoinen käsite. Hyvinvointikatsaus, 1(1997), 26–29.Google Scholar
  22. Kaufmann, D., Kraay, A., & Mastruzzi, M. (2009). Governance matters VIII: Aggregate and individual governance indicators 1996–2008. Washington, DC: The World Bank. Google Scholar
  23. Kerlin, J. (2006). Social enterprise in the United States and Europe: Understanding and learning from the differences. Voluntas, 17, 247–263. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. König, K. (2003). On the typology of public administration. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 69(4), 449–462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lægreid, P., Sarapuu, K., Rykkja, L., & Randma-Liiv, T. (2016). Organizing for coordination in the public sector: Practices and lessons from 12 European countries. Basingstoke: Springer.Google Scholar
  26. Lange, B., Haines, F., & Thomas, D. (2015). Regulatory Transformations. Rethinking Economy-Society Interactions. London, UK: Bloomsbury Publishing.Google Scholar
  27. Lange, M., & Rueschemeyer, D. (2005). States and development: Historical antecedents of stagnation and advance. Basingstoke: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. (1999). The quality of government. The Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 15(1), 222–279.Google Scholar
  29. Lee, K., & Raadschelders, J. (2008). Political-administrative relations: Impact of and puzzles in Aberbach, Putnam, and Rockman, 1981. Governance, 21(3), 419–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Legatum. (2018, September 2). 2018-last update. Legatum prosperity index [Homepage of Legatum Institute]. Available: https://prosperitysite.s3-accelerate.amazonaws.com/3515/1187/1128/Legatum_Prosperity_Index_2017.pdf.
  31. Moran, M. (2002). Review article: Understanding the regulatory state. British Journal of Political Science, 32(2), 391–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Mouritzen, P. E., & Svara, J. H. (2002). Leadership at the apex: Politicians and administrators in Western local governments. Pittsburg: University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar
  33. OECD. (2017). Government at a glance 2017. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  34. Olsen, J. P. (2006). Maybe it is time to rediscover bureaucracy. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 16(1), 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Ortiz-Ospina, E., & Roser, M. (2018, August 23). 2018-last update. Public Spending. Available: https://ourworldindata.org/public-spending.
  36. Paquet, G. (1999). Governance through social learning. Ottawa, ON, Canada: University of Ottawa Press.Google Scholar
  37. Paquet, G. (2005). The new geo-governance: A baroque approach. Ottawa, ON, Canada: University of Ottawa Press.Google Scholar
  38. Polanyi, K. (1944). The great transformation. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
  39. Porter, M. (1990). The competitive advantage of nations. New York: Free Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Putnam, R. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
  41. Putnam, R., Leonardi, R., & Nanetti, R. (1993). Making democracy work: Civic traditions in modern Italy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Google Scholar
  42. Raadschelders, J., Vigoda-Gadot, E., & Kisner, M. (2015). Global dimensions of public administration and governance: A comparative voyage. Hoboken, NJ: Jossey Bass.Google Scholar
  43. Salamon, L. M. (2016). Putting NPIs and the third sector on the economic map of the world. 47th Session of the United Nations Statistical Commission, New York.Google Scholar
  44. Simon, H. (1947). Administrative behavior: A study of decision-making process in administrative organization. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  45. Streeck, W. (2014). Buying time: The delayed crisis of democratic capitalism. London and New York: Verso.Google Scholar
  46. Thelen, K. (2012). Varieties of capitalism: Trajectories of liberalization and the new politics of social solidarity. Annual Review of Political Science, 15, 137–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Verhoest, K., van Thiel, S., Bouckaert, G., & Lægreid, P. (2016). Government agencies: Practices and lessons from 30 countries. Basingstoke: Springer. Google Scholar
  48. Vowe, G. (2008). Politics, policy, polity. In L. Kaid & C. Holtz-Backa, (Eds.), Encyclopedia of political communication (p. 621). Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  49. Weber, M. (1978). Economy and society: An outline of interpretive sociology. Berkeley: University of California Press. Google Scholar
  50. Whitley, R. (1999). Divergent capitalisms: The social structuring and change of business systems. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  51. Woolcock, M. (2001). Microenterprise and social capital: A framework for theory, research, and policy. Journal of Socio-Economics, 30(2), 193–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. WWS. (2018, September 2). 2018-last update, World value survey [Homepage of World Value Survey]. Available: http://www.worldvaluessurvey.org/wvs.jsp.

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of TampereTampereFinland

Personalised recommendations