Advertisement

Politics of Relation, Politics of Love

  • Emma Reed Jones
Chapter

Abstract

Today, the world seems rancorously preoccupied with identity to the exclusion of all else: nationalist and isolationist discourses abound based on identitarian claims to certain values, ways of life, and geographies. On the other hand, liberal and cosmopolitan discourses oppose the rise of nationalism but also focus on identity. Against this political backdrop, I argue, Luce Irigaray’s latest volume To Be Born provides us with the groundwork for a vital new alternative to identity politics. In this text, Irigaray traces the ways that desire and sexuate belonging are currently subsumed to Western metaphysical discourses that, I suggest, contribute to our current obsession with identity. Crucially, she also outlines the possibility of another path: a re-birth in and of desire that could return us to the source of our human becoming, but one that is only possible in living relation to the other who is different from us. In this way, Irigaray provides an ontological and ethical framework to radically shift our focus away from all issues of identity to the paradigm of relation, which gives birth to a transmutation of desire that can become love.

Bibliography

  1. Duchen, C. (1986). Feminism in France: From May ’68 to Mitterand. Boston: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  2. French, D. (2016, 18 May). Identity Politics and Race Are Ripping Us Apart. National Review. http://www.nationalreview.com/article/435567/identity-politics-race-are-ripping-us-apart. Accessed on August 30, 2017.
  3. Heidegger, M. (1998). Pathmarks (W. McNeill, Trans.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (Includes ‘On the Essence and Concept of Physis in Aristotle’s Physics B1’).Google Scholar
  4. Irigaray, L. (1985 [1974]). Speculum of the Other Woman (G. C. Gill, Trans.). Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Irigaray, L. (1985 [1977]). This Sex Which Is Not One (C. Porter, Trans.). Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Irigaray, L. (1993 [1984]). An Ethics of Sexual Difference (C. Burke & G. C. Gill, Trans.). Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Irigaray, L. (1996). I Love to You: Sketch of a Possible Felicity in History (A. Martin, Trans.). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  8. Irigaray, L. (2017). To Be Born. Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  9. Jones, E. R. (2011). Speaking at the Limit: The Ontology of Luce Irigaray’s Ethics in Dialogue with Lacan and Heidegger(Doctoral Dissertation Presented to the University of Oregon Graduate School).Google Scholar
  10. Jones, E. R. (2012). The Future of Sexuate Difference: Irigaray, Heidegger, Ontology, and Ethics. L’Esprit Createur, 52(3) (Fall), 26–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Jones, E. R. (2017). Finding/Founding Our Place: Thinking Luce Irigaray’s Ontology and Ethics of Sexuate Difference as a Relational Limit. In Building a New World (pp. 15–30). Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Lancaster, R. (2017, August 3). Identity Politics Can Only Get Us so Far. Jacobin.Google Scholar
  13. Lilla, M. (2016, November 18). The End of Identity Liberalism. The New York Times.Google Scholar
  14. McKirahan, R. (2010). Philosophy Before Socrates. Indianapolis: Hackett.Google Scholar
  15. Rosenfeld, S. (2017, 26 August). The Spread of White Nationalism Is Taking Our Nation into Uncharted and Dangerous Territory. Salon. http://www.salon.com/2017/08/26/the-spread-of-white-nationalism-is-taking-our-nation-into-uncharted-and-dangerous-territory_partner/. Accessed on August 29, 2017.

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Emma Reed Jones
    • 1
  1. 1.Psychotherapist and Independent ScholarLivermoreUSA

Personalised recommendations