Advertisement

From Desire to Be Born to Desire for Being Together in the Philosophy of Luce Irigaray

  • Katarzyna Szopa
Chapter

Abstract

In her latest book, To Be Born, Luce Irigaray pays attention to the question of desire, which becomes one of her key notions in understanding sexuate difference, because desire, according to her, functions as a relational energy which contributes to our individuation and our blossoming, and helps us to enter into relations with the other(s). In her essay “Perhaps Cultivating Touch Can Still Save Us”, Irigaray explains that in a culture based on pairs of mutually exclusive opposites, our energy remains uneducated and subordinated to normative values which are abstracted from the real, thus it is “not yet prepared for a human sharing” (Building a New World, p. 278). Consequently, desire, which above all “arises from difference”, is destroyed “by appropriating its energy and reducing it to sameness” (idem), although its destiny is to transcend our being “to a beyond”, to another horizon that firstly is embodied by the other who is naturally and irreducibly different from us.

Bibliography

  1. Butler, J. (2009). Frames of War: When Is Life Grievable? London, NY: Verso.Google Scholar
  2. Cheah, P., & Grosz, E. (1998). On Being-Two: Introduction. Diacritics, 28.Google Scholar
  3. Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1983). Anti-Oedipus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia (R. Hurley, M. Seem, & H. R. Lane, Trans.). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  4. Freud, S. (1990). Femininity. In New Introductory Lectures in Psychoanalysis (J. Strachey, Trans.). New York: W.W. Norton.Google Scholar
  5. Irigaray, L. (1985a). Speculum of the Other Woman (G. C. Gill, Trans.). Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Irigaray, L. (1985b). This Sex Which Is Not One (C. Porter & C. Burke, Trans.). Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Irigaray, L. (1993a). An Ethics of Sexual Difference (C. Burke & G. C. Gill, Trans.). London: The Athlone Press.Google Scholar
  8. Irigaray, L. (1993b). Je, Tu, Nous: Toward a Culture of Difference (A. Martin, Trans.). London, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  9. Irigaray, L. (1993c). Sexes and Genealogies (G. C. Gill, Trans.). New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Irigaray, L. (1996). I Love to You: Sketch for a Felicity Within History (A. Martin, Trans.). London, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  11. Irigaray, L. (2002a). The Way of Love (H. Bostic & S. Pluháček, Trans.). London, NY: Continuum.Google Scholar
  12. Irigaray, L. (2002b). To Speak Is Never Neutral (G. Schwab, Trans.). London, NY: Continuum.Google Scholar
  13. Irigaray, L. (2004). What Other Are We Talking About? Yale French Studies, 104 (2004).Google Scholar
  14. Irigaray, L., & Lotriner, S. (Eds.). (2000). Why Different? A Culture of Two Subject: Interviews with Luce Irigaray (C. Collins, Trans.). New York: Semiotext(s).Google Scholar
  15. Irigaray, L. (2015). Perhaps Cultivating Touch Can Still Save Us. In L. Irigaray & M. Marder (Eds.), Building a New World. Luce Irigaray: Teaching II. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  16. Irigaray, L. (2017). To Be Born: Genesis of a New Human Being. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  17. Jones, R. (2011). Irigaray: Towards a Sexuate Philosophy. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  18. Lorraine, T. (1999). Irigaray and Deleuze: Experiments in Visceral Philosophy. Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Plato. (1993). The Symposium. In The Dialogues of Plato (Vol. II, R. E. Allen, Trans.). New Heaven and London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Rozmarin, M. (2013). Living Politically: An Irigarayan Notion of Agency as a Way of Life. Hypatia, 38.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Katarzyna Szopa
    • 1
  1. 1.University of SilesiaKatowicePoland

Personalised recommendations