Advertisement

Organizational Designing

  • Andrée Marie López-Fernández
Chapter

Abstract

Organizations follow a certain path or track which they have created in accordance with their strategic planning. Like any other organizational process, the continuous innovation of design is required in order to ensure that it is effectively adapted to changes in the environment, organizational behavior, as well as collaborator attitudes and needs. It has become trendy to follow organizational design trends, as they are typically in tune with environmental changes; however, design challenges lie within the organization rather than outside it; that is, while trends are informative, following them is complex. Shifts in competition paradigms are telling of organizational designing efforts, environmental receptiveness, as well as the effectiveness of their test of time; however, it is the organization’s innovativeness that will lead to a design that drives responsiveness and the co-creation of value.

Keywords

Corporate philosophy Redesign Trends Shock damping Layering design 

References

  1. AbdEllatif, M., Farhan, M. S., & Shehata, N. S. (2018, June). Overcoming business process reengineering obstacles using ontology-based knowledge map methodology. Future Computing and Informatics Journal, 3(1), 7–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ahuja, M. K., & Carley, K. M. (1999, November–December). Network structure in virtual organizations. Organization Science, 10(6), 693–815.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bao, T., & Wang, Y. (2012, September). Incomplete contract, bargaining and optimal divisional structure. Journal of Economics, 107(1), 81–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. BBC. (2017, April 18). ‘There is no news’: What a change from 1930 to today. Retrieved May 24, 2018, from Entertainment & Arts: http://www.bbc.com/news/entertainment-arts-39633603.
  5. Chandler, A. (1962). Strategy and structure: Chapters in the history of American industrial enterprise. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  6. Clippinger, J. H. (1999). Order from the bottom up: Complex adaptive systems and their management. In J. H. Clippinger (Ed.), Order from the bottom up: Complex adaptive systems and their management. The biology of business: Decoding the natural laws of enterprise (pp. 1–30). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.Google Scholar
  7. Cramer, C. (2005). Why the world is watching CNN. Retrieved May 24, 2018, from CNN’s impact around the world: http://edition.cnn.com/services/opk/cnn25/cnns_impact.htm.
  8. Daft, R. L., Murphy, J., & Willmott, H. (2010). Organization theory and design. Andover: South-Western.Google Scholar
  9. Davenport, T. H., & Short, J. E. (1990). The new industrial engineering: Information technology and business process redesign. Sloan Management Review, 31(4), 11–27.Google Scholar
  10. Davidovitch, L., Parush, A., & Shtub, A. (2010). Simulator-based team training to share resources in a matrix structure organization. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 57(2), 288–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Desa, S., Nagurka, M. L., & Ghosal, A. (1987, August 17–20). Product redesign for performance, manufacture, and assembly: A rational methodology towards total system design. International Conference on Engineering Design (pp. 1–10). Boston: ICED 87.Google Scholar
  12. Earl, M. J. (1994, March). The new and the old of business process redesign. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 3(1), 5–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fiedler, K. D., Grover, V., & Teng, J. (1995). An empirical study of information technology enabled business process redesign and corporate competitive strategy. European Journal of Information Systems, 4(1), 17–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Galbraith, J. R. (2002, May). Organizing to deliver solutions. Organizational Dynamics, 31(2), 194–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Grant, A. M., & Ashford, S. J. (2008). The dynamics of proactivity at work. Research in Organizational Behavior, 28, 3–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Haigh, N., Kennedy, E. D., & Walker, J. (2015). Hybrid organizations as shape-shifters: Altering legal structure for strategic gain. California Management Review, 57(3), 59–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hammer, M., & Champy, J. (1993). Reengineering the corporation: A manifesto for business transformation. New York: Harper Business.Google Scholar
  18. Hoetker, G. (2006, June). Do modular products lead to modular organizations? Strategic Management Journal, 27(6), 501–518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Isabella, L. A., & Waddock, S. A. (1994, August). Top management team certainty: Environmental assessments, teamwork, and performance implications. Journal of Management, 20(4), 835–858.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kahneman, D., Slovic, P., & Tversky, A. (1982). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. MacQueen, K. M., Mclellan-Lemal, E., Bartholow, K., & Milstein, B. (2008). Team-based codebook development: Structure, process, and agreement. In G. Guest & K. M. MacQueen (Eds.), Handbook for team-based qualitative research (pp. 101–135). Lanham: Altamira Press.Google Scholar
  22. Ozcelik, Y. (2010, January). Do business process reengineering projects payoff? Evidence from the United States. International Journal of Project Management, 28(1), 7–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Roberts, D. J. (2004). The modern firm: Organizational design for performance and growth. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Sharma, M. K., Sushil, & Jain, P. K. (2010, July). Revisiting flexibility in organizations: Exploring its impact on performance. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 11(3), 51–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Stanford, N. (2005). Organization design. The collaborative approach. Oxford: Elsevier Butterworth-Heinemann.Google Scholar
  26. Tinnilä, M. (1995). Strategic perspective to business process redesign. Business Process Re-engineering & Management Journal, 1(1), 44–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Walker, B., Holling, C. S., Carpenter, S. R., & Kinzig, A. (2004, December). Resilience, adaptability and transformability in social-ecological systems. Ecology and Society, 9(2). Retrieved August 15, 2018, from http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol9/iss2/art5/.
  28. Yang, L., FitzPatrick, M., Varey, R., & Costley, C. (2015, June 10–13). Towards a holistic ‘sustainability’ for the mutual enhancement of humans and nature. 2nd International Social Business Conference. Anadolu: Anadolu University.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Andrée Marie López-Fernández
    • 1
  1. 1.Universidad PanamericanaMexico CityMexico

Personalised recommendations