Advertisement

Collaborator Management

  • Andrée Marie López-Fernández
Chapter

Abstract

Millions of people around the world making their way to work are thinking about the day they are about to have. They are planning their day, going down the list of pending work, and picturing the exchanges they will most likely have with others in order to complete their tasks. While some are enthused, knowing that they are about to have pleasant interactions, others have increasing feelings of disconcertion and anxiety and are dreading the moment they step into the office. When managing collaborators, there are a great many factors that must be considered, including dialogue, voice, empowerment, task delegation and completion, and goal achievement, among many others; perhaps the most important factor that should by no means be overlooked is human nature.

Keywords

Collaborator dialogue Silence Empowerment Collaborator MO Generational collaboration 

References

  1. Armstrong, M. (2006). A handbook of human resource management practice. Philadelphia: Kogan Page Limited.Google Scholar
  2. Bakotić, D. (2016). Relationship between job satisfaction and organisational performance. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, 29(1), 118–130.Google Scholar
  3. Bartram, T. (2011). Employee management systems and organizational contexts: A population ecology approach. Management Research Review, 34(6), 663–677.Google Scholar
  4. Benge, E. J. (1984). Employee performance appraisal. In C. Heyel (Ed.), The foreman/supervisor’s handbook (pp. 344–363). Boston: Springer.Google Scholar
  5. Bititci, U. S., Carrie, A. S., & McDevitt, L. (1997). Integrated performance measurement systems: A development guide. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 17(5), 522–534.Google Scholar
  6. Boxall, P., & Purcell, J. (2011). Strategy and human resource management. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  7. Boyatzis, R. E. (1982). The competent manager: A model for effective performance. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.Google Scholar
  8. Carroll, A. B. (1991, July–August). The pyramid of corporate social responsibility: Toward the moral management of organizational stakeholders. Business Horizons, 34(4), 39–48.Google Scholar
  9. Cialdini, R. B., & Goldstein, N. J. (2004). Social influence: Compliance and conformity. Annual Review of Psychology, 55, 591–621.Google Scholar
  10. Gabčanová, I. (2012, March). Human resources key performance indicators. Journal of Competitiveness, 4(1), 117–128.Google Scholar
  11. Grünberg, T. (2004). Performance improvement: Towards a method for finding and prioritising potential performance improvement areas in manufacturing operations. International Journal of Productivity Management, 53(1), 52–71.Google Scholar
  12. Hitt, M. A., & Duane, R. (2002). The essence of strategic leadership: Managing human and social capital. Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies, 9(1), 3–14.Google Scholar
  13. Hofstede, G. (2011). Dimensionalizing cultures: The Hofstede model in context. Online Readings in Psychology and Culture, 2(1), 1–26.Google Scholar
  14. Hüsrevşahi, S. P. (2015, October). Relationship between organizational mobbing and silence behavior among teachers. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 15(5), 1179–1188.Google Scholar
  15. Iraldo, F., Testa, F., & Frey, M. (2009, November). Is an environmental management system able to influence environmental and competitive performance? The case of the eco-management and audit scheme (EMAS) in the European Union. Journal of Cleaner Production, 17(16), 1444–1452.Google Scholar
  16. Jurczak, J. (2008). Intellectual Capital measurement methods. Economics and Organization of Enterprise, 1(1), 37–45.Google Scholar
  17. Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (1992). The balanced scorecard: Measures that drive performance. Harvard Business Review (January–February), 71–79.Google Scholar
  18. Lee, E. M., Park, S.-Y., & Lee, H. J. (2013, October). Employee perception of CSR activities: Its antecedents and consequences. Journal of Business Research, 66(10), 1716–1724.Google Scholar
  19. López-Fernández, A. M. (2018). Leadership paradigm affecting SGA to drive organizational performance: A Study of collaborator empowerment across organizations in Mexico. In Rajagopal & R. Behl (Eds.), Start-up enterprises and contemporary innovation strategies in the global marketplace (pp. 100–120). Hershey: IGI Global.Google Scholar
  20. Mazzei, A., & Ravazzani, S. (2011). Manager-employee communication during a crisis: The missing link. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 16(3), 243–254.Google Scholar
  21. McWilliams, A., & Siegel, D. (2000, May). Corporate social responsibility and financial performance: Correlation or misspecification? Strategic Management Journal, 21(5), 603–609.Google Scholar
  22. Men, L. R. (2014, February). Strategic internal communication. Transformational leadership, communication channels, and employee satisfaction. Management Communication Quarterly, 28(2), 264–284.Google Scholar
  23. Morrison, E. W., & Milliken, F. J. (2000, October). Organizational silence: A barrier to change and development in a pluralistic world. The Academy of Management Review, 25(4), 706–725.Google Scholar
  24. Moullin, M. (2007). Performance measurement definitions. Linking performance measurement and organisational excellence. International Journal of Health Care Quality Assurance, 20(3), 181–183.Google Scholar
  25. Pinder, C. C., & Harlos, K. P. (2001). Employee silence: Quiescence and acquiescence as responses to perceived injustice. Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management, 20(1), 331–369.Google Scholar
  26. Prajogo, D. I., & Sohal, A. S. (2006, January). The relationship between organization strategy, total quality management (TQM) and organization performance-the mediating role of TQM. European Journal of Operational Research, 168(1), 35–50.Google Scholar
  27. Ramsay, H., Scholarios, D., & Harley, B. (2000, December). Employees and high-performance work systems: Testing inside the black box. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 38(4), 501–531.Google Scholar
  28. Roberts, K. H., & O’Reilly, C. A. (1974). Failures in upward communication in organizations: Three possible culprits. Academy of Management Journal, 17(2), 205–215.Google Scholar
  29. Rotemberg, J. J., & Saloner, G. (1993). Leadership style and incentives. Management Science, 39(11), 1299–1318.Google Scholar
  30. Tamuz, M. (2001). Learning disabilities for regulators: The perils of organizational learning in the air transportation industry. Administration & Society, 33(3), 276–302.Google Scholar
  31. Tootell, B., Blackler, M., Toulson, P., & Dewe, P. (2009, November). Metrics: HRM’s Holy Grail? A New Zealand case study. Human Resource Management Journal, 19(4), 375–392.Google Scholar
  32. Valentine, S., & Fleischman, G. (2008, January). Ethics Programs, perceived corporate social responsibility and job satisfaction. Journal of Business Ethics, 77(2), 159–172.Google Scholar
  33. Vitaliano, D. F. (2010). Corporate social responsibility and labor turnover. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 10(5), 563–573.Google Scholar
  34. Walker, K. F. (1977, November). Towards useful theorising about industrial relations. British Journal of Industrial Relations, XV(3), 307–316.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Andrée Marie López-Fernández
    • 1
  1. 1.Universidad PanamericanaMexico CityMexico

Personalised recommendations