Advertisement

Mitigating Slipping-Related Mortality from Purse Seine Fisheries for Small Pelagic Fish: Case Studies from European Atlantic Waters

  • Ana MarçaloEmail author
  • Mike BreenEmail author
  • Maria Tenningen
  • Iñigo Onandia
  • Luis Arregi
  • Jorge M. S. Gonçalves

Abstract

The release of unwanted catches (UWC) from purse seines, while the catch is still in the water, is known as “slipping”. Once thought to be a benign process, compared to discarding UWC overboard from the fishing vessel, it is now recognised that “slipping” can lead to significant mortality in the released fish if done inappropriately. In this chapter, we examine purse seining and slipping operations, and discuss what drives slipping and potential mitigation measures to reduce slipping mortality. We use three examples of purse seine fisheries for small pelagic species in the North-east Atlantic; from Norway, Portugal and Spain. The ideal solution (identifying and avoiding UWC before the net is set) requires the development of tools to enable fishers to better characterise target schools in terms of key selection criteria, e.g., with respect to species, individual size and catch biomass. Such tools are being developed, based primarily on hydro-acoustic technology. However, some UWC in purse seine catches are inevitable, and operational improvements in slipping practices have been shown to significantly reduce stress and mortality in the released UWC. We conclude with a discussion on the challenges currently facing the implementation of the European Union (EU) Landing Obligation with regards to minimising slipping related mortality.

Keywords

Bycatch and slipping mitigation Delayed mortality Pelagic fish Purse seine 

References

  1. Arregi, L., Onandia, I., Ferarios, J.M., Ruiz J., Basurko, O.C. (2014). Assessing fish survival from slipping in purse seine fisheries of European southern waters. AZTI-Tecnalia, Sukarrieta (p. 44). [Report Presented to STECF Plenary 14-02].Google Scholar
  2. Borges, T.C., Erzini, K., Bentes, L., Costa, M.E., Gonçalves, J.M.S., Lino, P.G., et al. (2001). By-catch and discarding practices in five Algarve (southern Portugal) métiers. Journal of Applied Ichthyology, 17, 104–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Breen, M., Isaksen, B., Ona, E., Pedersen, A.O., Pedersen, G., Saltskår, J., et al. (2012). A review of possible mitigation measures for reducing mortality caused by slipping from purse-seine fisheries. ICES CM 2012, C:12.Google Scholar
  4. Breen, M., & Cook, R. (2002). Inclusion of Discard and Escape Mortality Estimates in Stock Assessment Models and its likely impact on Fisheries Management. ICES CM 2002/V, 27, 15pp.Google Scholar
  5. Breen, M., Anders, N., Humborstad, O.-B., Nilsson, J., Tenningen, M., Vold, A. (In review). Catch welfare in commercial fisheries. In F. Kristiansen, & Van de Vis Pavlidis (Eds.), Fish Welfare. Springer.Google Scholar
  6. Breen, M., Saltskår, J., Anders, N., Totland, B., Øvredal, J.T., Tenningen, M., Handegard, N.O., Peña, H. (In review). A novel method for monitoring the behaviour of mackerel (Scomber scombrus) in relation to crowding and oxygen concentrations in commercial purse seine catches. Submitted to PLoS One.Google Scholar
  7. Broadhurst, M.K., Suuronen, P., Hulme, A. (2006). Estimating collateral mortality from a towed fishing gear. Fish and Fisheries, 7, 180–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. CRISP. (2018). CRISP: The Centre for Research-based Innovation in Sustainable fish capture and Processing technology. http://crisp.imr.no/en/projects/crisp/
  9. Davis, M.W. (2002). Key principles for understanding fish bycatch discard mortality. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 59, 1834–1843.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. DGRM. (2017). DATAPESCAS. N° 115/Janeiro-Dezembro 2017. Direção Geral dos Recursos Naturais, Segurança e Serviços Marítimos, Lisboa (p. 11).Google Scholar
  11. Digre, H., Tveit, G.M., Solvang-Garten, T., Eilertsen, A., Aursand, I.G. (2016). Pumping of mackerel (Scomber scombrus) onboard purse seiners, the effect on mortality, catch damage and fillet quality. Fisheries Research, 176, 65–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. EU. (2013). REGULATION (EU) No 1380/2013 OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL of 11 December 2013 on the Common Fisheries Policy, amending Council Regulations (EC) No 1954/2003 and (EC) No 1224/2009 and repealing Council Regulations (EC) No 2371/2002 and (EC) No 639/2004 and Council Decision 2004/585/EC.Google Scholar
  13. EU. (2014a). Discard Plan for certain pelagic fisheries in north-western waters. Commission Delegated Regulation (EU), No 1393/2014.Google Scholar
  14. EU. (2014b). Discard Plan for certain pelagic fisheries in the North Sea. Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) No 1395/2014.Google Scholar
  15. EU. (2014c). Discard Plan for certain pelagic fisheries in south-western waters, Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 1394/2014.Google Scholar
  16. Feijó, D., Marçalo, A., Bento, T., Barra, J., Marujo, D., Correia, M., Silva, A. (2018). Trends in the activity pattern, fishing yields, catch and landing composition between 2009 and 2013 from onboard observations in the Portuguese purse seine fleet. Regional Studies in Marine Science. Available online 1 January 2018,  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rsma.2017.12.007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gerlotto, F., & Paramo, J. (2003). The three-dimensional morphology and internal structure of clupeid schools as observed using vertical scanning multibeam sonar. Aquatic Living Resources, 16, 113–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gilman, E., Suuronen, P., Chaloupka, M. (2017). Discards in global tuna fisheries. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 582, 231–252.  https://doi.org/10.3354/meps12340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gullestad, P., Blom, G., Bakke, G., Bogstad, B. (2015). The “Discard Ban Package”: Experiences in efforts to improve the exploitation patterns in Norwegian fisheries. Marine Policy, 54, 1–9.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2014.09.025.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hall, M.A., Alverson, D.L., and Metuzals K.I. (2000). By-catch: Problems and solutions. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 41, 204–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hall, M., & Roman, M. (2013). Bycatch and non-tuna catch in the tropical tuna purse seine fisheries of the world. FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Technical Paper No. 568. Rome, FAO (p. 249).Google Scholar
  22. Handegard, N.O., Tenningen, M., Howarth, K., Anders, N., Rieucau, G., Breen, M. (2017, December). The loss of schooling function in mackerel in response to crowding but not hypoxia. PLoS ONE, 12(12), e0190259.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0190259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Holmin, A.J., Handegard, N.O., Korneliussen, R.J., Tjostheim, D. (2012). Simulations of multi-beam sonar echos from schooling individual fish in a quiet environment. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 132, 3720–3734.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Horne, J.K. (2000). Acoustic approaches to remote species identification: An introductory review. Fisheries Oceanography, 9, 356–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Huse, I., and Vold A. (2010). Mortality of mackerel (Scomber scombrus L.) after pursing and slipping from a purse-seine. Fisheries Research, 106, 54–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. ICES. (2016). Report of the Workshop on Methods for Estimating Discard Survival 5 (WKMEDS 5), 23–27 May 2016, Lorient, France. ICES CM 2016/ACOM:56 (p. 51).Google Scholar
  27. ICES. (2018). Advice on fishing opportunities, catch, and effort. Bay of Biscay and the Iberian Coast Ecoregion pil.27.8c9a.  https://doi.org/10.17895/ices.pub.4495.
  28. ICES. (2018; In press). ICES WKMEDS Guidance on Method for Estimating Discard Survival. Breen, M. & Catchpole, T. (Eds.). ICES Cooperative Research Report. In press.Google Scholar
  29. Isaksen, B. (2013). Fish sampling by shooting a mini-trawl into the purse seine. IMR Marine Research News, 2-2013. https://www.hi.no/filarkiv/2013/07/hi_nytt_2_2013_til_web.pdf/en
  30. Karp, W.A., Breen, M., Borges, L., Fitzpatrick, M., Kennelly, S.J., Kolding, J., et al. (this volume). Strategies used throughout the world to manage fisheries discards – Lessons for implementation of the EU Landing Obligation. In S.S. Uhlmann, C. Ulrich, S.J. Kennelly (Eds.), The European Landing Obligation – Reducing discards in complex, multi-species and multi-jurisdictional fisheries. Cham: Springer.Google Scholar
  31. Kelleher, K. (2005). Discards in the world’s marine fisheries. An update. FAO Fisheries Tech Paper, No. 470. Rome, FAO (p. 131).Google Scholar
  32. Korneliussen, R.J., Heggelund, Y., Eliassen, I.K., and Johansen, G.O. (2009). Acoustic species identification of schooling fish. ICES Journal of Marine Science, 66, 1111–1118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Larsen, T.A., & Dreyer, B. (2013). Ringnot – Struktur og lønnsomhet. Tromsø: Nofima (ISBN 978-82-8296-111-0) 25, p. Nofima rapportserie (34/2013).Google Scholar
  34. Lockwood, S.J., Pawson, M.G., and Eaton, D.R. (1983). The effects of crowding on mackerel (Scomber scombrus L.) physical condition and mortality. Fisheries Research, 2, 129–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. LSSS. (2018). http://cmr.no/projects/10396/lsss/. Accessed 7 July 2018.
  36. MAPAMA. (2017). Ministerio de Agricultura y Pesca, Alimentación y Medio Ambiente (MAPAMA), Estadísticas Pesqueras Noviembre 2017. Recovered 1/04/2018: http://www.mapama.gob.es/es/estadistica/temas/estadisticas-pesqueras/
  37. Marçalo, A., Mateus, L, Correia, J.H.D., Serra, P., Fryer, R., Stratoudakis, Y. (2006). Sardine (Sardina pilchardus) stress reactions to purse-seine fishing. Marine Biology, 149, 1509–1518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Marçalo, A. (2009). Sardine (Sardina pilchardus) delayed mortality associated with purse-seine slipping: contributing stressors and responses. Tese de doutoramento. Faculdade de Ciências e Tecnologia. Universidade do Algarve. 189pp.Google Scholar
  39. Marçalo, A., Marques, T.A., Araújo, J., Pousão-Ferreira, P., Erzini, K., Stratoudakis, Y. (2010). Fishing simulation experiments for predicting effects of purse-seine capture on sardine (Sardina pilchardus). ICES Journal of Marine Science, 67, 334–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Marçalo, A., Guerreiro, P.M., Bentes, L., Rangel, M., Monteiro, P., Oliveira, F., Afonso, C., Pousão-Ferreira, P., Benoît, H., Breen, M., Erzini, K., Gonçalves, J.M.S. (2018). Effects of different slipping methods on the mortality of sardine, Sardina pilchardus, after purse-seine capture off the Portuguese Southern coast (Algarve). PLoS One, 13(5), e0195433.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0195433.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  41. Maynou, F., Gil, M.D.M., Vitale, S., Giusto, G.B., Foutsi, A., Rangel, M., Rainha, R., Erzini, K., Gonçalves, J.M.S., Bentes, L., Viva, C., Sartor, P., Carlo, F., Rossetti, I., Christou, M., Stergiou, K., Maravelias C.D., Damalas, D. (2018). Fishers’ perceptions of the European Union discards ban: Perspective from south European fisheries. Marine Policy, 89, 147–153.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2017.12.019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Megalofonou, P., Yannopoulos, C., Damalas, D., De Metrio, G., Deflorio, M., de la Serna, J.M., Macias, D.. (2005). Incidental catch and estimated discards of pelagic sharks from the swordfish and tuna fisheries in the Mediterranean Sea. Fisheries Bulletin, 103, 620–634.Google Scholar
  43. Mesnil, B. (1996). When discards survive: Accounting for survival of discards in fisheries assessments. Aquatic Living Resources, 9, 209–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Mitchell, R.W., Blight, S.J., Gaughan, D.J., Wright, I.W. (2002). Does the mortality of released Sardinops sagax increase if rolled over the headline of a purse-seine net? Fisheries Research, 57, 279–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Nishimori, Y., Iida, K., Furusawa, M., Tang, Y., Tokuyama, K., Nagai, S., Nishiyama, Y. (2009). The development and evaluation of a three-dimensional, echo-integration method for estimating fish-school abundance. ICES Journal of Marine Science, 66, 1037–1042.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. NSFR. (2014). Regulations relating to sea-water fisheries. Norwegian Ministry of Fisheries and Coastal Affairs. Amended 7th April 2014. https://www.fiskeridir.no/.../20140407-regulations-relating-to-sea-water-fisheries.pdf
  47. Norwegian Fisheries Directorate DataBase. (2018). Fishers, fishing vessels and licenses. https://www.fiskeridir.no/English/Fisheries/Statistics/Fishers-fishing-vessels-and-licenses. Accessed 7 July 2018.
  48. O’Neill, F.G., Feekings, J., Fryer, R.J., Fauconnet, L., Afonso, P. (this volume). Discard avoidance by improving fishing gear selectivity: Helping the fishing industry help itself. In S.S. Uhlmann, C. Ulrich, S.J. Kennelly (Eds.), The European Landing Obligation − Reducing discards in complex, multi-species and multi-jurisdictional fisheries. Cham: Springer.Google Scholar
  49. Peña, H., Saltskår, J., Totland, B., Vold, A., Breen, M., Ingolfsson, Ò.A., Tenningen, M. Øvredal, J.T. (2018). Purse Seine Catch Control. Final Project Report. Rapport fra Havforskningen 3-2018. (In Norwegian). https://www.hi.no/filarkiv/2017/12/3-2018-pscc_sluttrapp_av.pdf/nb-no
  50. Reid, D.G., Calderwood, J., Afonso, P., Fauconnet, L., Pawlowski, L., Plet-Hansen, K.S., et al. (this volume). The best way to reduce discards is by not catching them! In S.S. Uhlmann, C. Ulrich, S.J. Kennelly (Eds.), The European Landing Obligation − Reducing discards in complex, multi-species and multi-jurisdictional fisheries. Cham: Springer.Google Scholar
  51. Rihan, D., Uhlmann, S.S., Ulrich, C., Breen, M., Catchpole, T. (this volume). Requirements for documentation, data collection and scientific evaluations. In S.S. Uhlmann, C. Ulrich, S.J. Kennelly (Eds.), The European Landing Obligation − Reducing discards in complex, multi-species and multi-jurisdictional fisheries. Cham: Springer.Google Scholar
  52. SEAT. (2018). http://cmr.no/projects/10414/seat/. Accessed 7 July 2018.
  53. STECF. (2014). Scientific, Technical and Economic Committee for Fisheries (STECF) – 46th Plenary Meeting Report (PLEN-14-02). 2014. Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg, EUR 26810 EN, JRC 91540, 117 pp.Google Scholar
  54. STECF. (2017). Scientific, Technical and Economic Committee for Fisheries – The 2017 Annual Economic Report on the EU Fishing Fleet (STECF-17-12). Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg, 2017, ISBN 978-92-79-73426-7.  https://doi.org/10.2760/36154, PUBSY No. JRC107883.
  55. Silva, A., Moreno, A., Riveiro, I., Santos, B., Pita, C., Rodrigues, J.G. et al. (2015). Research for Pech Committee- Sardine Fisheries. Resource Assessment and Social and Economic Situation. Directorate- General for Internal Policies IP/B/PECH/IC/2015_133.Google Scholar
  56. SINTEF FKiN Project. (2018). Catch control in purse seine fishing. https://www.sintef.no/fangstkontroll
  57. Stratoudakis, Y., & Marçalo, A. (2002). Sardine slipping during purse-seining off northern Portugal. ICES Journal of Marine Science, 59, 1256–1262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Tenningen, M., Vold, A., Olsen, R.E. (2012). The response of herring to high crowding densities in purse-seines: Survival and stress reaction. ICES Journal of Marine Science, 69, 1523–1531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Tenningen, M., Macaulay, G.J., Rieucau, G., Pena, H., Korneliussen, R.J. (2017). Behaviours of Atlantic herring and mackerel in a purse-seine net, observed using multibeam sonar. ICES Journal of Marine Science, 74, 359–368.Google Scholar
  60. Tenningen, M., Pena, H., Macaulay, G.J. (2015). Estimates of net volume available for fish shoals during commercial mackerel (Scomber scombrus) purse seining. Fisheries Research, 161, 244–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Vatnehol, S., Pena, H., Ona, E. (2017). Estimating the volumes of fish schools from observations with multi-beam sonars. ICES Journal of Marine Science, 74, 813–821.Google Scholar
  62. Veiga, P., Pita, C., Rangel, M., Gonçalves, J.M.S., Campos, A., Fernandes, P.G., et al. (2016). The EU landing obligation and European small-scale fisheries: What are the odds for success? Marine Policy, 64, 64–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Villasante, S., Pierce, G.J., Pita, C., Guimeráns, C.P., Rodrigues J.G., Antelo, M., et al. (2016a). Fishers’ perceptions about the EU discards policy and its economic impact on small-scale fisheries in Galicia (North West Spain). Ecological Economics, 130, 130−138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Villasante, S., Pita, C., Pierce, G.J., Guimeráns, C.P., Rodrigues, J.G., Antelo, M., et al. (2016b). To land or not to land: How do stakeholders perceive the zero discard policy in European small-scale fisheries? Marine Policy, 71, 166–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Vold, A., Anders, N., Breen, M., Saltskår, J., Totland B. og Øvredal J.T. (2017). Beste praksis for slipping fra not. Utvikling av standard slippemetode for makrell og sild i fiske med not. Faglig sluttrapport for FHF-prosjekt 900999. Rapport fra Havforskningen nr. 6 2017. ISSN 1893–4536 (online).Google Scholar
  66. Watson, R., Revenga, C. & Kura, Y. (2006). Fishing gear associated with global marine catches. I Database development. Fisheries Research, 79(1–2), 97–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Open Access This chapter is licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license and indicate if changes were made.

The images or other third party material in this chapter are included in the chapter’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the chapter’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ana Marçalo
    • 1
    Email author
  • Mike Breen
    • 2
    Email author
  • Maria Tenningen
    • 2
  • Iñigo Onandia
    • 3
  • Luis Arregi
    • 3
  • Jorge M. S. Gonçalves
    • 1
  1. 1.Centro de Ciências do Mar-CCMARUniversidade do AlgarveFaroPortugal
  2. 2.Institute of Marine Research (IMR)BergenNorway
  3. 3.AZTI, Txatxarramendi ugartea z/gSukarrietaSpain

Personalised recommendations