Advertisement

A Marine Spatial Planning Approach to Minimize Discards: Challenges and Opportunities of the Landing Obligation in European Waters

  • José M. BellidoEmail author
  • Iosu Paradinas
  • Raúl Vilela
  • Guillermo Bas
  • Maria Grazia Pennino

Abstract

A sensible approach to minimize discards is to avoid areas or seasons where unwanted catch may be present. The implementation of a Marine Spatial Planning (MSP) approach to discard management requires the understanding of marine biological processes, as well as fishing conditions at a defined spatial scale. Mathematical models that analyze the spatio-temporal conditions of selected fishing areas allow the definition of different scenarios where discards are minimized by avoiding fishing for unwanted species and/or illegal specimens. Here we show some examples of how particular spatial models can be used for advice on MSP for discards. We introduce a geoserver GIS platform developed to produce maps of discard probability by using a Fishing Suitable Index. We also give an example of simulating virtual fishing closures. The inclusion of a Marine Spatial Planning approach to implement the Landing Obligation will bring some new challenges and opportunities. Finally, we will discuss and suggest some recommendations for its effective and successful implementation.

Keywords

Discards GIS platform Landing obligation Maps of discard probability Marine spatial planning Simulating fishing closures 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work was funded by the Project iSEAS, Ref. LIFE13 ENV/ES/000131, “Knowledge-Based Innovative Solutions to Enhance Adding-Value Mechanisms towards Healthy and Sustainable EU Fisheries”, cofounded under the LIFE+Environmental Program of the European Union. We are deeply grateful to all the partnerships on this project and particularly to the observers who gather the fishing data within the IEO discarding observer program. The collection of fishery data has been co-funded by the EU through the European Maritime and Fisheries Fund (EMFF) within the National Program of collection, management and use of data in the fisheries sector and support for scientific advice regarding the Common Fisheries Policy.

References

  1. Bellido, J.M., Santos, M.B., Pennino, M.G., Valeiras, X., Pierce, G.J. (2011). Fishery discards and bycatch: Solutions for an ecosystem approach to fisheries management? Hydrobiologia, 670(1), 317–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Borges, T.C., Erzini, K., Bentes, L., Costa, M.E., GonÓalves, J.M.S., Lino, P.G., et al. (2001). By-catch and discarding practices in five Algarve (southern Portugal) mÕtiers. Journal of Applied Ichthyology, 17, 104–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Crisci, C., Ghattas, B., Perera, G. (2012). A review of supervised machine learning algorithms and their applications to ecological data. Ecological Modelling, 240, 113–122. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2012.03.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cutler, D.R., Edwards, T.C., Beard, K.H., Cutler, A., Hess, K.T., Gibson, J., Lawler, J.J. (2007). Random forests for classification in ecology. Ecology, 88, 2783–2792.  https://doi.org/10.1890/07-0539.1. PMID:18051647.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Ehler, C., & Douvere, F. (2009). Marine spatial planning: A step-by-step approach toward ecosystem-based management. Intergovernmental oceanographic commission and man and the biosphere programme. IOC manual and guides no. 53, ICAM dossier no. 6. Paris: UNESCO. 2009 (English).Google Scholar
  6. Elith, J., & Leathwick, J.R. (2009). Species distribution models: Ecological explanation and prediction across space and time. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics, 40(1), 677–697.  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.110308.120159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. EU. (2013). Regulation (EU) No 1380/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council on 11 December 2013 on the Common Fisheries Policy, amending Council Regulations (EC) No 1954/2003 and (EC) No 1224/2009 and repealing Council Regulations (EC) No 2371/2002 and (EC) No 639/2004 and Council Decision 2004/585/EC.Google Scholar
  8. Fogarty, M.J., & Botsford, L.W. (2007). Population connectivity and spatial management of marine fisheries. Oceanography, 20, 112–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hobday, A. J., & Hartmann, K. (2006). Near real-time spatial management based on habitat predictions for a longline bycatch species. Fisheries Management and Ecology, 13, 365–380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Karp, W.A., Breen, M., Borges, L., Fitzpatrick, M., Kennelly, S.J., Kolding, J., et al. (this volume). Strategies used throughout the world to manage fisheries discards – Lessons for implementation of the EU Landing Obligation. In S.S. Uhlmann, C. Ulrich, S.J. Kennelly (Eds.), The European Landing Obligation – Reducing discards in complex, multi-species and multi-jurisdictional fisheries. Cham: Springer.Google Scholar
  11. Maxwell, S. M., Hazen, E. L., Lewison, R. L., Dunn, D. C., Bailey, H., Bograd, S. J., Briscoe, D. K., Fossette, S., Hobday, A. J., Bennett, M., Benson, S., Caldwell, M. R., Costa, D. P., Dewar, H., Eguchi, T., Hazen, L., Kohin, S., Sippel, T., Crowder, L. B., (2015). Dynamic ocean management: defining and conseptualizing real-time management of the ocean. Marine Policy, 58, 42–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Meaden, G.J. (2000). Application of GIS to fisheries management. In D.J. Wright & D.J. Bartlett (Eds.), Marine and coastal geographical information systems (pp 205–226). London: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
  13. Muñoz, F., Pennino, M.G., Conesa, D; López-Quílez, A., Bellido, J.M. (2012). Estimation and prediction of the spatial occurrence of fish species using Bayesian latent Gaussian models. Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment, 27, 1171–1180.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-012-0652-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. O’Keefe, C. E., Cadrin, S. X., Stokesbury, K. D. E. (2013). Evaluating effectiveness of time/area closures, quotas/caps and fleet communications to reduce fisheries bycatch. ICES Journal of Marine Science, 71, 1286–1297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Paradinas, I., Martín, M., Pennino, M.G., López-Quílez, A., Conesa, D., Barreda, D., Gonzalez, M., Bellido, J.M. (2016). Identifying the best fishing-suitable areas under the new European discard ban. ICES Journal of Marine Science, 2479– 2487.  https://doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/fsw114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Pennino, M.G., Muñoz, F., Conesa, D., López-Quílez, A., Bellido, J.M. (2014). Bayesian spatio-temporal discard model in a demersal trawl fishery. Journal of Sea Research, 90, 44–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Pennino, M.G., Vilela, R., Valeiras, J., Bellido, J.M. (2017). Discard management: A spatial multi-criteria approach. Marine Policy, 77, 144–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Sims, M., Cox, T., Lewison, R. (2008). Modeling spatial patterns in fisheries bycatch: Improving bycatch maps to aid fisheries management. Ecological Applications 18, 649–661.  https://doi.org/10.1890/07-0685.1.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Vilela, R., & Bellido, J.M. (2015). Fishing suitability maps: Helping fishermen reduce discards. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 72, 1191–1201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Warren, W.G. (1998). Spatial analysis for marine populations: Factors to be considered. Proceedings of the North Pacific Symposium on Invertebrate Stock Assessment and Management, Canadian special publication of fisheries and aquatic sciences, 125, 2128.Google Scholar
  21. Williams, M.J., & Corral, V.P. (1999). Fisheries monitoring: Management models, compliance and technical solutions. In C.P. Nolan (Ed.), Proceedings of the international conference on integrated fisheries monitoring. Sydney, Australia, 1–5 February 1999 (pp. 37–50). Rome: FAO. 378 p.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Open Access This chapter is licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license and indicate if changes were made.

The images or other third party material in this chapter are included in the chapter’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the chapter’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.

Authors and Affiliations

  • José M. Bellido
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Iosu Paradinas
    • 3
  • Raúl Vilela
    • 1
  • Guillermo Bas
    • 1
  • Maria Grazia Pennino
    • 1
  1. 1.Instituto Español de Oceanografía, Centro Oceanográfico de MurciaMurciaSpain
  2. 2.Statistical Modeling Ecology Group (SMEG), Departament d’Estadística i Investigació OperativaUniversitat de ValènciaValenciaSpain
  3. 3.Asociación Ipar PerspectiveSopelaSpain

Personalised recommendations