Advertisement

The Use of Forensic Archaeology in Missing Person Cases

  • Ann Marie MiresEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

Forensic scientific investigations concern themselves with inquiry into the specific context of a crime and the manner in which the crime was committed. Forensic Archaeology is a scientific discipline that applies archaeological techniques to recover, analyze, and interpret human remains from a variety of medicolegal and contemporary circumstances. This forensic inquiry allows for the examination and interpretation of death scenes and their associated bodily remains for information that can reveal the identity of the person, as well as associated evidence and context that reveal the circumstances of the crime. In this paper, the expansion of the role of Forensic Archaeology to assist in the location of missing persons, both from recent and remote contexts, will be presented. Current research on missing persons at the national and local level suggest that missing persons, from both intentional and accidental means, are often found within a 1–5 mile radius of where they were last seen. By examining current patterns in the manner of death, or information enlightening “by whose hand,” much can be learned about the particular circumstances that lead to body deposition and behavior at death scenes. As information is compiled, trends in the data assist in creating a series of correlates that can be used as predictors of a particular manner of death. These data provide scenarios that can be used as predictive models to implement at the time a person goes missing to reduce the time between disappearance and location, rescue or recovery. Additionally, this modeling proves useful when reexamining cold cases of unfound missing persons in an attempt to locate these unfound after considerable time. Case examples, utilizing Forensic Archaeology Recovery (FAR) personnel, will be presented to highlight the use of predictive modeling in search and recovery and in unfound missing persons’ cases.

Keywords

Missing persons Massachusetts Manner of death Predictive modeling Forensic Archaeology Recovery 

References

  1. DiMaio, D. J., & DiMaio, J. M. (1993). Forensic pathology. Boca Raton: CRC Press.Google Scholar
  2. Eggeman, M. (2005). Abducted and murdered children: Searching for the victims of sexual predators. Virginia: Virginia Department of Emergency Management.Google Scholar
  3. Finkelhor, D., Hotaling, G., & Sedlak, A. (1990). Missing, abducted, runaway and thrownaway children in America. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.Google Scholar
  4. France, D. L., Griffin, T., Swanburg, J., Lindemann, J., Davenport, G., Trammell, V., Travis, C., Kondratieff, B., Nelson, A., Castellano, K., Hopkins, D., & Adair, T. (1997). NecroSearch revisited: Further multidisciplinary approaches to the detection of clandestine graves. In W. D. Haglund & M. H. Sorg (Eds.), Forensic taphonomy: The postmortem fate of human remains. Boca Raton: CRC Press.Google Scholar
  5. Fundamentals of Search and Rescue. (2005). In D. C. Cooper (Ed.) Sudbury: National Association for Search and Rescue, Jones and Bartlett Publishers.Google Scholar
  6. Gleason, M. (2008). The search for human remains in the search and rescue environment. Virginia: Search and Rescue Tracking Institute.Google Scholar
  7. Gould, R. A. (2007). Disaster archaeology. Salt Lake City: The University of Utah Press.Google Scholar
  8. Joukowsky, M. (1980). A complete manual of field archaeology: Tools and techniques of field work for archaeologists. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  9. Killam, E. W. (2004). The detection of human remains. Springfield: Charles C Thomas Publishers, LTD.Google Scholar
  10. Koester, R. J. (2008). Lost person behavior; a search and rescue guide on where to look-for land, air and water. Charlottesville: dbS Productions.Google Scholar
  11. Koff, C. (2004). The bone woman: A forensic anthropologist’s search for the truth in Rwanda, Bosnia, Croatia, and Kosovo. Canada: Alfred A. Knopf.Google Scholar
  12. Land Search and Rescue Addendum to the National Search and Rescue Supplement to International Aeronautical and Maritime Search and Rescue Manual, Version 1.0 November 2011 (www.uscg.mil/nsarc).
  13. Mires, A. M. & Giordano, A. (2004). Using GIS technology to locate clandestine human remains. Abstract/presentation: American Academy of Forensic Sciences Annual Meeting Proceedings, Dallas, TX.Google Scholar
  14. Nawrocki, S. P. (1996). An outline of forensic archeology. University of Indianapolis Archeology and Forensics Laboratory. http://archlab.uindy.edu.
  15. Obledo, M. N. (2009). Forensic archeology in criminal and civil cases. In Forensic magazine. http://www.forensicmag.com/articles/2009/08/forens.
  16. Poirier, D. A. & Bellantoni, N. F. (1999). Forensic archeology: A humanistic science. In Cultural resource management, No. 10.Google Scholar
  17. Ritter, N. (2007). Missing persons and unidentified remains: The nation’s silent mass disaster. In National institute of justice journal no. 256. Office of Justice Programs, National Institute of Justice.Google Scholar
  18. Syrotuck, W. G. (2000). Analysis of lost person behavior: An aid to search planning. Mechanicsburg: Barkleigh Productions.Google Scholar
  19. Woolnough, P., Stevenson, O., & Parr, H. (2015). Investigating missing persons: Learning from interviews with families. The Journal of Homicide and Major Incident Investigations, 10(1), 1–13.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Forensic CriminologyAnna Maria CollegePaxtonUSA

Personalised recommendations