Advertisement

Professionalism in Forensic Archaeology: Transitioning from “Cowboy of Science” to “Officer of the Court”

  • Melissa A. ConnorEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

Forensic science is science applied to the law. To be effective forensic scientists, archaeologists need to learn what constitutes the elements of the crimes with which they might interact, how to create documentation for court, and how to qualify as, and be, an expert witness. They may also deal with many types of artifacts, or evidence, not normally found on an archaeological site. This chapter takes a forensic case example from the initial call to the archaeologist by the police to the courtroom and highlights the similarities and differences between anthropological archaeology and forensic archaeology. Forensic archaeology is a subdiscipline that requires not only a strong background in archaeological fieldwork but additional training in the forensic sciences.

Keywords

Anthropological archaeology Forensic archaeology Probative value SWGANTH Forensic science 

References

  1. Bass, B., & Jefferson, J. (2003). Death’s acre: Inside the legendary forensic lab the body farm where the dead do tell tales. New York: Berkley.Google Scholar
  2. Belay, E. D., & Schonberger, L. B. (2005). The public health impact of prion diseases. Annual Review of Public Health, 26, 191–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Centers for Disease Control. (2014). Prion diseases. http://www.cdc.gov/ncidod/dvrd/prions/. Retrieved Jan 9, 2014.
  4. Connor, M. A. (2007). Forensic methods: Excavation for the archaeologist and investigator. New York: Altimira Press.Google Scholar
  5. Connor, M. A., & Scott, D. D. (2001). Archaeologists as forensic investigators: Defining the role. Historical Archaeology, 35(1), 1–6.Google Scholar
  6. Crist, T. J. (2001). Bad to the bone?: Historical archaeologists in the practice of forensic science. In M. Connor & D. D. Scott (Eds.), Archaeologists as forensic investigators: Defining the role. Historical Archaeology, 35(1), 39–56.Google Scholar
  7. Galloway, A., & Josh Snodgrass, J. (1998). Biological and chemical hazards of forensic skeletal analysis. Journal of Forensic Sciences, 43, 940–948.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Gardner, R. M. (2012). Practical crime scene processing and investigation (2nd ed.). Florida: CRC Press.Google Scholar
  9. Inman, K., & Rudin, N. (2000). Principles and practice of criminalistics: The profession of forensic science, Protocols in Forensic Science. Florida: CRC Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Locard, E. (1928). Dust and its analysis. Police Journal, 1, 177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Locard, E. (1930). The analysis of dust traces, Part I–III. American Journal of Police Science, 1, 276 401,496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Robinson, E. (2010). Crime scene photography (2nd ed.). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science & Technology Books.Google Scholar
  13. Saferstein, R. (2009). Forensic science: From the crime scene to the crime lab. New Jersey: Pearson.Google Scholar
  14. Stanford, C., John, S. A., & Anton, S. C. (2013). Biological anthropology (3rd ed.). New York: Pearson.Google Scholar
  15. Stocking, G. W. (1974). A Franz boas reader: The shaping of American anthropology, 1883–1911. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  16. SWGANTH. (2013). Scene detection and processing. http://swganth.startlogic.com/Scene%20Detection%20and%20Processing%20Rev%200.pdf. Accessed 07 Jan 2014.

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Forensic Investigation Research StationColorado Mesa UniversityGrand JunctionUSA

Personalised recommendations