Advertisement

Putting “Science” into Forensic Science: A Chemist’s Perspective on Forensic Archaeology

  • Susan White
Chapter

Abstract

John F. Kennedy once said that he was a Berliner (1). Following in his footsteps, albeit less exalted in my case, I would like the record to state that I am a chemist. Despite various peregrinations in my career, I am at heart a chemist. Yet, I also lay claim to be a forensic archaeologist. While some may wonder why I did not pursue the well-established discipline of forensic chemistry, or even toxicology, a topic for another time, the thrust of this discussion is to determine what my background and training has meant to my study of forensic archaeology.

Keywords

Chemistry Forensic science Scientific method UK Law Commission Daubert trilogy Adipocere 

References

  1. Ambach, W., Ambach, E., Tributsch, W., Henn, R., & Unterdorfer, H. (1992). Corpses released from glacier ice: Glaciological and forensic aspects. Journal of Wilderness Medicine, 3, 374.Google Scholar
  2. Aufderheide, A. C. (2003). The scientific study of mummies (p. 41). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press 172, 287.Google Scholar
  3. Brothwell, D. (1996). European bog bodies; current state of research and preservation. In K. Spindler et al. (Eds.), Human mummies. A global survey of their status and the techniques of conservation (Vol. 164, pp. 161–172). Vienna: Springer.Google Scholar
  4. Carpenter, R. G., Waite, A., Coombs, R. C., Daman-Willems, C., McKenzie, A., Huber, J., & Emery, J. L. (2005). Repeat sudden unexpected and unexplained infant deaths: Natural or unnatural? The Lancet, 365(9453), 29–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Churchill, W. (1939). BBC Broadcast, London, 1 Oct 1939.Google Scholar
  6. Cotton, G. E., Aufderheide, A. C., & Goldschmidt, V. G. (1987). Preservation of human tissue immersed for five years in fresh water of known temperature. Journal of Forensic Sciences, 32(4), 1126–1128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dana, E., Sarnat, H., & Talmi, E. (1989). Effect of the birth process on the neonatal line in primary tooth enamel. Pediatric Dentistry, The American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry, 11(3), 220–223.Google Scholar
  8. Daubert v Merrell Dow. (1993). 580.Google Scholar
  9. De Fourcroy, A. (1790). Me’moire sur les diffe’ rens e’tats cadavers trouve’ s dans le fouilles du cimetie’ re des Innocens en 1786 & 1787. Annals de Chimie, 5, 154–185.Google Scholar
  10. den Dooren de Jong, L. E. (1961). On the formation of Adipocere from fats: Contribution to the microbiology of systems containing two liquid phases. Antonies von Leeuwenhoek Journal of Microbiology and Serology, 27, 337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dix, J. D., & Graham, M. (2000). Time of death, decomposition and identification: An atlas (Vol. 13). Boca Raton: CRC.Google Scholar
  12. Evans, W. E. D. (1962). Some histological findings in spontaneously preserved bodies. Medicine Science and Law, 2, 155–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Evans, W. E. D. (1963). The chemistry of death (p. 40). Springfield: Charles C. Thomas.Google Scholar
  14. Fiedler, S., & Graw, M. (2003). Decomposition of buried corpses, with special reference to the formation of adipocere. Naturwissenschaften, 90(7), 291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fischer, B. (1999). The Katyn controversy: Stalin’s killing field. CIA, Center for the Studies in Intelligence, Winter 1999–2000. https://www.cia.gov/library/center-for-the-study-of-intelligence/csi-publications/csi-studies/studies/winter99-00/art6.html.
  16. Forbes, S. L., Stuart, B. H., Dadour, I. R., & Dent, B. B. (2004). A preliminary investigation of the stages of Adipocere formation. Journal of Forensic Sciences, 49(3), 566.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Forensic Science Regulator. (2013). Forensic Science Codes of Practice: Guidance on validation consultation. 16 Aug 2013. https://www.gov.uk/government/consultations/forensic-science-codes-of-practice-guidance-on-validation-consultation. GOV.UK.
  18. Fountain, J., & Gunby, P. (2010). Ambiguity, the certainty illusion, and Gigerenzer’s natural frequency approach to reasoning with inverse probabilities. University of Canterbury. p. 6.Google Scholar
  19. General Electric Co. v. Joiner. (1997). 522 U.S. 136.Google Scholar
  20. Gornall, J. (2006). Was message of sudden infant death study misleading? BMJ, 333, 1165–1168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Government response to Law Commission report on expert evidence. (2013). Expert evidence in criminal proceedings in England and Wales, The Government’s response to the Law Commission report. (Law Com No 325). Published 21 November, 2013. Ministry of Justice.Google Scholar
  22. Haglund, W. D., & Sorg, M. H. (1996). Forensic taphonomy: The postmortem fate of human remains. Boca Raton: CRC.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. House of Commons Science and Technology Committee Forensic Science on Trial Seventh Report of Session Report. (2005). Report. House of commons. London: The Stationery Office Limited.Google Scholar
  24. Janaway, R. C. (1987). The preservation of organic materials in association with metal artefacts deposited in inhumation graves. In A. Boddington, A. N. Garland, & R. C. Janaway (Eds.), Death, decay and reconstruction: approaches to archaeology and forensic science (Vol. 132, pp. 127–141). Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Janaway, R. C. (1996). The decay of buried human remains and their associated materials. In J. Hunter, C. Roberts, & A. Martin (Eds.), Studies in crime: An introduction to forensic archaeology (pp. 58–85). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  26. Kagawa, M., Matsubara, K., Kimura, K., Shiono, H., & Fukui, Y. (1996). Species identification by the positional analysis of fatty acid composition in Triacylglyceride of adipose and bone tissues. Forensic Science International, 79, 216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kumho Tire Co. v. Carmichael. (1999). 526 U.S. 137.Google Scholar
  28. Law Commission. (2009). The admissibility of expert evidence in criminal proceedings in England and Wales: A new approach to the determination of evidentiary reliability: A consultation paper, consultation paper no. 190. London: MOJ.Google Scholar
  29. Law Commission Report. (2011). Expert evidence in criminal proceedings in England and Wales. Paper no. 325. London: MOJ.Google Scholar
  30. Manhein, M. H. (1997). Decomposition rates of deliberate burials: A case study of preservation. In W. D. Haglund & M. H. Sorg (Eds.), Forensic taphonomy: The postmortem fate of human remains (Vol. 477, pp. 469–482). Boca Raton: CRC Press.Google Scholar
  31. Mant, A. K. (1950). A study in exhumation data. MD thesis, University of London, 41–42.Google Scholar
  32. Molleson, T., & Cox, M. (1993). The Spitalfields project (pp. 10–19). London: Council for British Archaeology.Google Scholar
  33. Nafte, M. (2000). Flesh and bone: An introduction to forensic anthropology (p. 46). Durham: Carolina Academic Press.Google Scholar
  34. National Research Council. (2009). Strengthening forensic science in the United States: A path forward. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.  https://doi.org/10.17226/12589.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Oxford Dictionaries: British and World English. (2016). “Scientific Method.” Accessed 28 May 2016.Google Scholar
  36. Pain, S. (2001). Arrow points to foul play in ancient iceman’s death, NewScientistTech, archived from the original on 23 Aug 2014.Google Scholar
  37. Polson, C. J., Gee, D. J., & Knight, B. (1985). The essentials of forensic medicine (4th ed.pp. 23–25). Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
  38. R v Cannings (2004). EWCA Crim 01.Google Scholar
  39. R. v. Mark Dallagher (2002). EWCA Crim 1903.Google Scholar
  40. R. v. Sally Clark (2003). EWCA Crim 1020.Google Scholar
  41. Rollo, F., Ubaldi, M., Ermini, L., & Marota, I. (2002). Ötzi’s last meals: DNA analysis of the intestinal content of the Neolithic glacier mummy from the Alps. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 99(20), 12594–12599.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Royal Statistical Society concerned by issues raised in Sally Clark case (PDF) (Press release). Royal Statistical Society. 23 Oct 2001.Google Scholar
  43. Saukko, P., & Knight, B. (2004). Knight’s forensic pathology (3rd ed.p. 71). London: Arnold.Google Scholar
  44. Schwartz, J. H., Houghton, F., Macchiarelli, R., & Bondioli, L. (2010). Skeletal remains from Punic Carthage do not support systematic sacrifice of infants. PLoS One, 5(2), e9177.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.000917.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Simonsen, J. (1977). Early formation of Adipocere in temperate climate. Medicine Science and Law, 17(1), 53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Stewart, T. D. (1979). Essentials of forensic anthropology. Springfield: Charles C. Thomas.Google Scholar
  47. Takatori, T., & Yamaoka, A. (1977). The mechanism of adipocere formation 1. Identification and chemical properties of hydroxy fatty acids in adipocere. Forensic Science, 9(1), 63–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. The Criminal Procedure Rules. (2014). Part 33 as in force on 6 October 2014. The Criminal Procedure Rules, no. 1610 (L. 26) legislation.gov.uk.
  49. Thompson, E. L., & Shumann, E. L. (1987). Interpretation of statistical evidence in criminal trials: The Prosecutor’s fallacy and the defense Attorney’s fallacy. Law and Human Behavior., 2(3), 167.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01044641.JSTOR1393631.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Xella, P., Quinn, J., Melchiorri, V., & van Dommelen, P. (2013). Cemetery or sacrifice? Infant burials at the Carthage tophet: Phoenician bones of contention. Antiquity, 87, 1199–1207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Susan White
    • 1
  1. 1.Member of the Advisory Board, UCL Centre for the Forensic SciencesLondonUK

Personalised recommendations