Advertisement

Labor Movement in Brazil: Challenges and Opportunities for a Left-Wing Labor Politics

  • Adalberto CardosoEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Marx, Engels, and Marxisms book series (MAENMA)

Abstract

The labor movement in Western capitalism has consolidated a work ethic that is quite different from the bourgeois one identified by Max Weber. Its distributive justice was based on necessities (“to each one according to his necessities”, to put it in a Marxian way) and not on birth or merits or talents. The image of the good society was not a hierarchical but an egalitarian one. The base of social cohesion was not market by competition but by social solidarity. Social order did not arise from the “invisible hand” of markets but from state intervention. The welfare state was one of the forms of incarnation of this work ethic; communism another one.

 In Brazil, the work ethic consolidated from the 1930s onward was based neither on equality nor on solidarity. Its main form was the desire and the fight for state intervention to assure the protection of workers from the harsh operation in the country’s wild labor market. Because this ethic was deeply ingrained in the workers’ minds and hearts, I argue that this is one of the reasons why the left has had, historically, an enormous difficulty in organizing a strong labor movement, in spite of the major role labor movements have played in some crucial junctures. Other crucial reasons revolve around state violence against unions and left-wing parties, the union structure, and the structure of the labor market. Most of these reasons are still present in the 21st century, albeit in different forms and levels of importance.

 This chapter brings evidence on each of these topics, which is elucidated in dialogue with the historiography of labor, especially its focus on the Thompsonian idea of “experience”, and with recent literature on the dilemmas of unionism and left-wing parties. It also presents new data on the union structure, union density, and collective action, and on changes in the structure of the labor market.

Keywords

Trade unions Labor movement State Work ethic Experience 

References

  1. Almeida, Gelsom R. 2007. O governo Lula, o Fórum Nacional do Trabalho e a reforma sindical. Katálysis 10 (1). Florianópolis Jan./June, http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1414-49802007000100007.
  2. Boito, Armando, Jr., and Paula Marcelino. 2010. O sindicalismo deixou a crise para trás? Um novo ciclo de greves na década de 2000. Caderno CRH. Bahia 23 (59): 323–338.Google Scholar
  3. Boltanski, Luc, and Ève Chiapello. 2005. The New Spirit of Capitalism. London/New York: Verso.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bresser Pereira, Luis Carlos. 2010. Globalization and Competition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Bringel, Breno M., and Geoffrey Pleyers. 2015. Junho de 2013… dois anos depois. Polarização, impactos e reconfiguração do ativismo no Brasil. Nueva Sociedad, special number in Portuguese, October. http://nuso.org/media/articles/downloads/COY1_Bringel_Pleyers.pdf. Accessed 1 Mar 2018.
  6. Cardoso, Adalberto. 1999. Sindicatos, trabalhadores e a coqueluche neoliberal: A Era Vargas acabou. Rio de Janeiro: FGV.Google Scholar
  7. ———. 2003. A Década Neoliberal e a Crise dos Sindicatos no Brasil. São Paulo: Boitempo.Google Scholar
  8. ———. 2013. Ensaios de sociologia do mercado de trabalho brasileiro. Rio de Janeiro: FGV.Google Scholar
  9. ———. 2018. A Construção da Sociedade do Trabalho no Brasil. Uma investigação sobre a persistência secular das desigualdades. 2nd ed. Rio de Janeiro: Amazon.Google Scholar
  10. Cardoso, Adalberto, and Telma Lage. 2007. As normas e os fatos. Desenho e efetividade das instituições de regulação do mercado de trabalho no Brasil. Rio de Janeiro: FGV.Google Scholar
  11. Castel, Robert. 1998. As Metamorfoses da Questão Social: Uma Crônica do Salário. Petrópolis: Vozes.Google Scholar
  12. DIEESE. 2017. Balanço das greves de 2016. Estudos e Pesquisas No. 84, São Paulo: DIEESE.Google Scholar
  13. Esping-Andersen, Gösta. 1985. Politics Against Markets: The Social-Democratic Road to Power. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Fischer, Brodwyn. 2008. A Poverty of Rights. Citizenship and Inequality in Twentieth-Century Rio de Janeiro. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  15. French, John D. 2004. Drowning in Laws. Labor Law and Brazilian Political Culture. Chapel Hill/London: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
  16. Galvão, Andréia, Paula Marcelino, and Patrícia V. Trópia. 2015. As bases sociais das novas centrais sindicais brasileiras. Curitiba: Appris.Google Scholar
  17. Habermas, Jürgen. 1987. A nova intransparência: a crise do Estado de bem-estar social e o esgotamento das energias utópicas. Novos Estudos Cebrap 18: 103–114.Google Scholar
  18. Korpi, Walter. 1983. The Democratic Class Struggle. London: Routledge/Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  19. Levine, Robert M. 1998. Father of the Poor? Vargas and His Era. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Lucca, Juan Bautista. 2011. Estudio comparado de la identidad partidaria-sindical durante el gobierno de Lula da Silva (Brasil, 2003–2006) y de Néstor Kirchner (Argentina, 2003–2007). PhD. Dissertation in Social Sciences (Buenos Aires: Facultad Latinoamericana de Ciencias Sociales).Google Scholar
  21. Marcelino, Paula. 2017. Sindicalismo e neodesenvolvimentismo: analisando as greves entre 2003 e 2013 no Brasil. Tempo Social 29 (3): 201–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Noronha, Eduardo G. 1994. Greves e Estratégias Sindicais no Brasil. In O Mundo do Trabalho: Crise e Mudança no Final do Século, ed. C.A. de Oliveira, J.F. Siqueira Neto, and M.A. de Oliveira, 323–358. Brasília/São Paulo/Campinas: MTb-PNUD/Cesit/Scritta.Google Scholar
  23. ———. 2009. Ciclo de greves, transição política e estabilização: Brasil, 1978–2007. Lua Nova 76: 119–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Offe, Claus. 1984. Contradictions of the Welfare State. In ed. John Keane. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  25. Paoli, Maria C. 1988. Labour, Law and the State in Brazil: 1930–1950. PhD Dissertation in History, Birkbeck College, University of London.Google Scholar
  26. Pochmann, Marcio. 2012. Nova classe média? O trabalho na base da pirâmide social brasileira. São Paulo: Boitempo.Google Scholar
  27. Przeworski, Adam. 1989. Capitalismo e social democracia. São Paulo: Companhia das Letras.Google Scholar
  28. Rodrigues, Iram J. 1999. A trajetória do Novo Sindicalismo. In O Novo Sindicalismo, vinte anos depois, ed. Iram Jácome Rodrigues, 73–94. Petrópolis/São Paulo: Vozes/Educ/Unitrabalho.Google Scholar
  29. ———. 2013. Para onde foram os sindicatos? Alguns dados para reflexão. Paper presented at 37° National Meeting of ANPOCS. Águas de Lindoia, September.Google Scholar
  30. Santos, Wanderley G. 1979. Cidadania e justiça. Rio de Janeiro: Campus.Google Scholar
  31. Silva, Sayonara Grillo C.L. 2008. Relações coletivas de trabalho. Configurações institucionais no Brasil contemporâneo. São Paulo: LTr.Google Scholar
  32. Singer, André. 2012. Os sentidos do Lulismo: reforma gradual e pacto conservador. São Paulo: Companhia das Letras.Google Scholar
  33. ———. 2013. Brasil, junho de 2013, classes e ideologias cruzadas. Novos Estudos - CEBRAP 97: 23–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Sluyter-Beltrão, Jeffrey. 2010. Rise and decline of Brazil’s New Unionism: The politics of the Central Única dos Trabalhadores. Oxford: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  35. Streeck, Wolfgang. 2014. Buying Time. The Delayed Crisis of Democratic Capitalism. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  36. Teixeira, Marilane O., et al. 2017. Contribuição crítica à reforma trabalhista. Campinas: Unicamp/CESIT.Google Scholar
  37. Thompson, Edward P. 1991. The Making of the English Working Class. Vol. 3. Toronto: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  38. Vargas, Getúlio. 1969. O governo trabalhista do Brasil. Vol. 4. Rio de Janeiro: José Olympio.Google Scholar
  39. Weber, Max. 1987. Economía y Sociedad. México: Fondo de Cultura.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Social and Political StudiesUniversity of the State of Rio de JaneiroRio de JaneiroBrazil

Personalised recommendations