Advertisement

Dry and Near-Dry Machining Techniques for Green Manufacturing

  • Sujan DebnathEmail author
  • Moola Mohan Reddy
  • Alokesh Pramanik
Chapter
Part of the Materials Forming, Machining and Tribology book series (MFMT)

Abstract

Dry and near-dry techniques have been developed for sustainability interventions in machining. These techniques not only take care of sustainability and make the machining green, but also improve productivity and surface quality. This chapter comprehensively discusses various important aspects of these green manufacturing techniques. It discusses the conventional cutting fluids, their ecological problems, recently developed green lubricants, and lubrication techniques and their applications. It also overt the latest development in oil-, aqueous-, and gas-based synthetic and semi-synthetic cutting fluids and their relative advantages and disadvantages toward green manufacturing. The environmental and health issues related to cutting fluids and the latest technologies to minimize the detrimental effects of cutting fluids on human and the environment have been discussed. Finally, the latest trends toward green manufacturing including dry machining, near-dry (i.e., minimum quantity lubrication (MQL)) machining, and nano-enhanced MQL machining are discussed. At the end, two MQL-based machining case studies utilizing vegetable-based cutting fluids have been presented to highlight the importance of advanced green manufacturing.

Keywords

Dry machining Green manufacturing Machinability MQL Nanofluid Near-dry machining 

References

  1. 1.
    Abdalla HS, Baines W, Mcintyre G, Slade C (2007) Development of novel sustainable neat-oil metal working fluids for stainless steel and titanium alloy machining. Part 1. Formulation development. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 34(1–2):21–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Amrita M, Shariq SA, Manoj CG (2014) Experimental investigation on application of emulsifier oil based nano cutting fluids in metal cutting process. Proc Eng 97:115–124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Amrita M, Srikant RR, Sitaramaraju AV (2014) Performance evaluation of nanographite-based cutting fluid in machining process. Mater Manuf Process 29:600–605CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    An QL, Fu YC, Xu JH (2011) Experintal study on turning of TC9 titanium alloy with cold water mist jet cooling. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 51(6):549–555CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Banerjee N, Sharma A (2014) Identification of a friction model for minimum quantity lubrication machining. J Clean Prod 83:437–443CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Belluco W, Chiffre LD (2004) Performance evaluation of vegetable-based oils in drilling austenitic stainless steel. J Mater Process Technol 148(2):171–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Cetin MH, Ozcelik B, Kuram E, Demirbas E (2011) Evaluation of vegetable based cutting fluids with extreme pressure and cutting parameters in turning of AISI 304L by Taguchi method. J Clean Prod 19(17–18):2049–2056CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Davoodi B, Tazehkandi AH (2014) Experimental investigation and optimization of cutting parameters in dry and wet machining of aluminum alloy 5083 in order to remove cutting fluid. J Clean Prod 68:234–242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Debnath S, Reddy MM, Yi QS (2014) Environmental friendly cutting fluids and cooling techniques in machining: a review. J Clean Prod 83:33–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Debnath S, Reddy MM, Yi QS (2016) Influence of cutting fluid conditions and cutting parameters on surface roughness and tool wear in turning process using Taguchi method. Measurement 78:111–119 (Elsevier)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Dhar NR, Islam MW, Islam S, Mithu MAH (2006) The influence of minimum quantity of lubrication (MQL) on cutting temperature, chip and dimensional accuracy in turning AISI-1040 steel. J Mater Process Technol 171:93–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Diniz AE, Micaroni R (2002) Cutting conditions for finish turning process aiming: the use of dry cutting. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 42(8):899–904CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Dixit US, Sarma DK, Davim JP (2012) Machining with minimal cutting fluid. Environmentally friendly machining. Springer, US, pp 9–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Eppert JJ, Gunter KL, Sutherland JW (2001) Development of cutting fluid classification system using cluster analysis. Tribol Trans 44(3):375–382CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Foulds L (2012) Cutting fluids. In: Rustemeyer T, Elsner P, John S-M, Maibach HI (eds) Kanerva’s occupational dermatology. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 715–725CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Fratila D (2009) Evaluation of near-dry machining effects on gear milling process efficiency. J Clean Prod 17:839–845CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Groover MP (2002) Fundamentals of modern manufacturing. Wiley, New JerseyGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Gupta K, Laubscher RF (2017) Sustainable machining of titanium alloys: a critical review. Proc IMechE Part B: J Eng Manuf 231(14):2543–2560CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Hadad M, Sadeghi B (2013) Minimum quantity lubrication-MQL turning of AISI4140 steel alloy. J Clean Prod 54:332–343CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Hadi M, Atefi R (2015) Effect of minimum quantity lubrication with gamma-Al2O3 nanoparticles on surface roughness in milling AISI D3 steel. Ind J Sci Technol 8(3):296–300CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Hassanpour H, Sadeghi MH, Rasti A, Shajari S (2016) Investigation of surface roughness, microhardness and white layer thickness in hard milling of AISI 4340 using minimum quantity lubrication. J Clean Prod 2015(12):091Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    John J, Bhattacharya M, Raynor PC (2004) Emulsions containing vegetable oils for cutting fluid application. Colloids Surf A 237(1–3):141–150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Julie ZZ, Rao PN, Eckman M (2012) Experimental evaluation of a bio-based cutting fluid using multiple machining characteristics. Int J Mod Eng 12(1–2):35–44Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Kalpakjian S, Schmid SR (2010) Manufacturing engineering and technology. Prentice Hall, New JerseyGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Klocke F, Kuchle A (2011) Manufacturing processes 1, RWTH edn. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 219–236Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Kouam J, Songmene V, Balazinski M, Hendrick P (2015) Effects of minimum quantity lubricating (MQL) conditions on machining of 7075-T6 aluminum alloy. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 79:1325–1334CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Kuram E, Ozcelik B, Bayramoglu M, Demirbas E, Tolga Simsek B (2013) Optimization of cutting fluids and cutting parameters during end milling by using D-optimal design of experiments. J Clean Prod 42:159–166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Kuram E, Ozcelik B, Demirbas E (2013) Environmentally friendly machining: vegetable based cutting fluids. In: Paulo Davim J (ed) Green manufacturing processes and systems. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 23–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Kuram E, Ozcelik B, Demirbas E, Şik E, Tansel IN (2011) Evaluation of new vegetable-based cutting fluids on thrust force and surface roughness in drilling of AISI 304 using Taguchi method. Mater Manuf Process 26(9):1136–1146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Kustas FM, Fehrehnbacher LL, Komanduri R (1997) Nano coatings on cutting tools for dry machining. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 46:39–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Lawal SA, Choudhury IA, Nukman Y (2012) Application of vegetable oil-based metalworking fluids in machining ferrous metals—a review. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 52(1):1–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Li KM, Liang SY (2007) Modeling of cutting forces in near dry machining under tool wear effect. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 47(7):1292–1301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Liew PJ, Shaaroni A, Sidik NAC, Yan J (2017) An overview of current status of cutting fluids and cooling techniques of turning hard steel. Int J Heat Mass Transf 114:380–394CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Lohar DV, Nanavaty CR (2013) Performance evaluation of minimum quantity lubrication (MQL) using CBN during hard turning of AISI 4340 and its comparison with dry and wet turning. Bonfring Int J Ind Eng Manag Sci 3(3):102–106Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Nabhani F (2001) Machining of aerospace titanium alloys. Robot Comput Integr Manuf 17:99–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Najiha MS, Rahman MM, Kadirgama K (2016) Performance of water-based TiO2 nanofluid during the minimum quantity lubrication machining of aluminium alloy, AA6061-T6. J Cleaner Prod. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.12.015
  37. 37.
    Naves VTG, Silva MBD, Silva FJD (2013) Evaluation of the effect of application of cutting fluid at high pressure on tool wear during turning operation of AISI 316 austenitic stainless steel. Wear 302(1–2):1201–1208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Ooi ME, Sayuti M, Sarhan AAD (2015) Fuzzy logic-based approach to investigate the novel uses of nano suspended lubrication in precise machining of aerospace AL tempered grade 606. J Clean Prod 89:286–295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Peng DX, Kang Y, Hwang RM, Shyr SS, Chang YP (2009) Tribological properties of diamond and SiO2 nanoparticles added in paraffin. Tribol Int. 42:911–917CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Rabiei F, Rahimi AR, Hadad MJ, Ashrafijou M (2015) Performance improvement of minimum quantity lubrication (MQL) technique in surface grinding by modelling and optimization. J Clean Prod 86:447–460CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Randegger-Vollrath A (1998) Determination of chlorinated paraffins in cutting fluids and lubricants. Fresenius’ J Anal Chem 360(1):62–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Rapeti P, Pasam VK, Gurram KMR, Revuru RS (2018) Performance evaluation of vegetable oil based nano cutting fluids in machining using grey relational analysis—a step towards sustainable manufacturing. J Clean Prod (online)Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Sales WF, Machado ÁR, Bonney J, Ezugwu EO (2007) Evaluation of cutting fluids using scratch tests and turning process. J Braz Soc Mech Sci Eng XXIX(4):372–378Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Saravanakumar N, Prabu L, Karthik M, Rajamanickam A (2014) Experimental analysis on cutting fluid dispersed with silver nano particles. J Mech Sci Technol 28(2):645–651CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Sayuti M, Sarhan AAD, Salem F (2014) Novel uses of SiO2 nano-lubrication system in hard turning process of hardened steel AISI 4140 for less tool wear, surface roughness and oil consumption. J Clean Prod 67:265–276CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Schey JA (2000) Introduction to manufacturing processes, 3rd edn. McGraw-Hill, SingaporeGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Sharma VS, Manu D, Suri NM (2009) Cooling techniques for improved productivity in turning. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 49(6):435–453CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Sharma AK, Tiwari AK, Dixit AR (2015) Improved machining performance with nano particle enriched cutting fluids under minimum quantity lubrication (MQL) technique: a review. Mater Today Proc 2(4–5):3545–3551CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Shashidhara YM, Jayaram SR (2010) Vegetable oils as a potential cutting fluid—an evolution. Tribol Int 43(5–6):1073–1081CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Shokoohi Y, Khosrojerdi E, Shiadhi BHR (2015) Machining and ecological effects of a new developed cutting fluid in combination with different cooling techniques on turning operation. J Clean Prod 94:330–339CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Shokrani A, Dhokia V, Newman ST (2012) Environmentally conscious machining of difficult-to-machine materials with regard to cutting fluids. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 57:83–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Silva LR, Corrêa ECS, Brandão JR, de Ávila RF (2013) Environmentally friendly manufacturing: behavior analysis of minimum quantity of lubricant—MQL in grinding process. J Clean Prod (In press)Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Soković M, Mijanović K (2001) Ecological aspects of the cutting fluids and its influence on quantifiable parameters of the cutting processes. J Mater Process Technol 109(1–2):181–189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Sreejith P (2008) Machining of 6061 aluminium alloy with MQL, dry and flooded lubricant conditions. Mater Lett 62:276–278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Thepsonthi T, Hamdi M, Mitsui K (2009) Investigation into minimal-cutting-fluid application in high-speed milling of hardened steel using carbide mills. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 49(2):156–162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Tschätsch H, Anette R (2009) Cutting fluids (coolants and lubricants). Applied machining technology. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 349–352CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Vamsi Krishna P, Srikant RR, Noageswara Rao D (2010) Experimental investigation on the performance of nanoboric acid suspensions in SAE-40 and coconut oil during turning of AISI 1040 steel. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 50(10):911–916CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Vieira JM, Machado AR, Ezugwu EO (2001) Performance of cutting fluids during face milling of steels. J Mater Process Technol 116(2–3):244–251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Xavior MA, Adithan M (2009) Determining the influence of cutting fluids on tool wear and surface roughness during turning of AISI 304 austenitic stainless steel. J Mater Process Technol 209(2):900–909CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Zhang Y, Li C, Jia D, Zhang D, Zhang X (2015) Experimental evaluation of MoS2 nanoparticles in jet MQL grinding with different types of vegetable oil as base oil. J Clean Prod 87:930–940CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Zhang S, Li JF, Wang YW (2012) Tool life and cutting forces in end milling Inconel 718 under dry and minimum quantity cooling lubrication cutting conditions. J Clean Prod 32:81–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sujan Debnath
    • 1
    Email author
  • Moola Mohan Reddy
    • 1
  • Alokesh Pramanik
    • 2
  1. 1.Curtin UniversityMiriMalaysia
  2. 2.Curtin UniversityPerthAustralia

Personalised recommendations