Brexit as a National Transformation Programme: Project Management Perspective

  • Ewa Sońta-DrączkowskaEmail author


This chapter discusses Brexit from a project management perspective. The British referendum in June 2016, with its surprising outcome, triggered the need for a major national transformation consisting of many projects. Various Brexit projects can be perceived as a single programme because they are interrelated and related to a common goal. The chapter analyses the current set-up of the Brexit programme from the perspective of Public Value Management theory and the Managing Successful Programmes framework. Two major areas are discussed: programme governance flaws and civil service resource scarcity.The study finds that the Brexit programme is a high-risk undertaking that poses huge organisational challenges to Britain’s public sector in the years to come.


  1. After Brexit: The UK Will Need to Renegotiate at Least 759 Treaties. Financial Times (2017). Financial Times Research.
  2. Busch, B., & Matthes, J. (2016). Brexit—The Economic Impact: A Meta-Analysis (IW-Report No. 10/2016).Google Scholar
  3. Capability in the Civil Service. (2017). NAO National Service Office (HC 919 SESSION 2016–17 24 MARCH 2017).
  4. Considine, M., & Lewis, J. M. (2003). Bureaucracy, Network, or Enterprise? Comparing Models of Governance in Australia, Britain, the Netherlands, and New Zealand. Public Administration Review, 63(2), 131–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Crawford, L., & Helm, J. (2009). Government and Governance: The Value of Project Management in the Public Sector. Project Management Journal, 40(1), 73–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dhingra, S., Ottaviano, G., Sampson, T., & Van Reen, J. (2016). The Consequences of Brexit for UK Trade and Living Standards. London School of Economics.Google Scholar
  7. Elonen, S., & Artto, K. A. (2003). Problems in Managing Internal Development Projects in Multi-project Environments. International Journal of Project Management, 21(6), 395–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Engwall, M., & Jerbrant, A. (2003). The Resource Allocation Syndrome: The Prime Challenge of Multi-project Management? International Journal of Project Management, 21(6), 403–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Evans, A. (2018). Planning for Brexit: The Case of the 1975 Referendum. The Political Quarterly, 89(1), 127–133. Scholar
  10. Goodwin, M. J., & Heath, O. (2016). The 2016 Referendum, Brexit and the Left Behind: An Aggregate-Level Analysis of the Result. The Political Quarterly, 87(3), 323–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kierzenkowski R., Pain, N., Rusticelli, E., & Zwart, S. (2016). The Economic Consequences of Brexit: A Taxing Decision. OECD.Google Scholar
  12. Managing Successful Programmes. (2011). London, UK: The Stationery Office, Axelos.Google Scholar
  13. Maylor, H., Brady, T., Cooke-Davies, T., & Hodgson, D. (2006). From Projectification to Programmification. International Journal of Project Management, 24(8), 663–674.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Meynhardt, T. (2009). Public Value Inside: What Is Public Value Creation? International Journal of Public Administration, 32(3–4), 192–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Moore, M. (1995). Creating Public Value—Strategic Management in Government. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Owen, J., & Munro. R. (2016). Whitehall’s Preparation for the UK’s Exit from the EU. Institute for Government.Google Scholar
  17. Owen, J., Shephard, M., & Sojanowic, A. (2017). Implementing Brexit: Customs. IGF Analysis, Institute for Government Commerce.Google Scholar
  18. Packendorff, J., & Lindgren, M. (2014). Projectification and Its Consequences: Narrow and Broad Conceptualizations. South African Journal of Economic and Management Sciences, 17(1), 7–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Stoker, G. (2006). Public Value Management: A New Narrative for Networked Governance? The American Review of Public Administration, 36(1), 41–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Zika-Viktorsson, A., Sundström, P., & Engwall, M. (2006). Project Overload: An Exploratory Study of Work and Management in Multi-project Settings. International Journal of Project Management, 24(5), 385–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Collegium of World EconomySGH Warsaw School of EconomicsWarsawPoland

Personalised recommendations