Advertisement

New Forms of Work in the Post-corporate Economy: Venture Labor, Contract Work, and Freelancing

  • Alexander Styhre
Chapter

Abstract

The first chapter of this volume discusses changes in corporate governance practices, especially the shareholder primacy model being enforced since the 1980 and the consequences for labor relations and employment conditions. The increased short-term orientation of corporations results in more insecure and lower-compensated work for a number of employees. The differences between professional work and occupational work and “early career work” are examined. Despite considerable variety in the labor market and in employment practices, the overarching tendency is to transfer risks from the employer to the employee, resulting in some cases in economic compensation being relatively lower for groups exposed to higher market risks. The chapter also introduces the key analytical term “venture work” used to examine salaried professional workers employed by life science ventures.

Keywords

Venture work Corporate governance Employment Economic inequality 

References

  1. Aghion, P., & Roulet, A. (2014). Growth and the Smart State. Annual Review of Economics, 6, 913–926.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aghion, P., Bloom, N., Blundell, R., Rachel, G., & Howitt, P. (2005). Competition and innovation: An inverted-U relationship. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 120, 701–728.Google Scholar
  3. Allen, F., & Gale, D. (1994). Liquidity preference, market participation and asset price volatility. American Economic Review, 84(4), 933–955.Google Scholar
  4. Amable, B., Ledezma, I., & Robin, S. (2017). Product market regulation, innovation, and productivity. Research Policy, 45(10), 2087–2104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Anderson, E. (2017). Private government: How employers rule our lives (and why we don’t talk about it). Princeton/Oxford: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Anderson, E. (2018). Policy entrepreneurs and the origins of the regulatory welfare state: Child labor reform in Nineteenth-century Europe. American Sociological Review, 83(1), 173–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Autor, D. H., Manning, A., & Smith, C. L. (2016). The contribution of the minimum wage to US wage inequality over three decades: A reassessment. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 8(1), 58–99.Google Scholar
  8. Banerjee, A. V., & Duflo, E. (2014). Under the thumb of history? Political institutions and the scope for action. Annual Review of Economics, 6, 951–971.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Baradaran, M. (2015). How the other half banks: Exclusion, exploitation, and the threat to democracy. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Barba, A., & Pivetti, M. (2008). Rising household debt: Its causes and macroeconomic implications—A long-period analysis. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 33(1), 113–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Beck, U. (2000). Welcome to the new world of work (P. Camiller, Trans.). Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  12. Berman, E. P., & Pagnucco, N. (2010). Economic ideas and the political process: Debating tax cuts in the U.S. House of Representatives, 1962–1981. Politics and Society, 38(3), 347–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bielby, W. T., & Bielby, D. D. (1999). Organizational mediation of project-based labor markets: Talent agencies and the careers of screenwriters. American Sociological Review, 64(1), 64–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Bonica, A., McCarty, N., Poole, K. T., & Rosenthal, H. (2013). Why hasn’t democracy slowed rising inequality. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 27(3), 103–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Brennan, D. M. (2014). ‘Too bright for comfort’: A Kaleckian view of profit realisation in the USA, 1964–2009. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 38(1), 239–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Cappelli, P. (1999). Career jobs are dead. California Management Review, 42(1), 146–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Cappelli, P., & Keller, J. R. (2013). Classifying work in the new economy. Academy of Management Review, 38(4), 575–596.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Cech, E., Rubineau, B., Susan, S., & Seron, C. (2011). Professional role confidence and gendered persistence in engineering. American Sociological Review, 76(5), 641–666.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Charness, G., Masclet, D., & Villeval, M. C. (2014). The dark side of competition for status. Management Science, 60(1), 38–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Ciepley, D. (2013). Beyond public and private: Toward a political theory of the corporation. American Political Science Review, 107(1), 139–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Cobb, A., & Lin, K.-H. (2017). Growing apart: The changing firm-size wage premium and its inequality consequences. Organization Science, 28(3), 429–446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Cobb, J. A. (2015). Risky business: The decline of defined benefit pensions and firms’ shifting of risk. Organization Science, 26(5), 1332–1350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Cockayne, D. G. (2016). Entrepreneurial affect: Attachment to work practice in San Francisco’s digital media sector. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 34(3), 456–473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Coffee, J. C. (1991). Liquidity versus control: The institutional investor as corporate monitor. Columbia Law Review, 91(6), 1277–1368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Coffee, J. C. (2006). Gatekeepers: The professions and corporate governance. New York/Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Coffee, J. C., Jr., & Palia, D. (2016). The wolf at the door: The impact of hedge fund activism on corporate governance. Journal of Corporation Law, 41(3), 545–607.Google Scholar
  27. Collins, J. L., & Kahn, W. N. (2016). The hijacking of a new corporate form? Benefit corporations and corporate personhood. Economy and Society, 45(3–4), 325–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Connelly Brian, L., Tihanyi, L., Trevis, C. S., & Hitt Michael, A. (2010). Marching to the beat of different drummers: The influence of institutional investors on competitive actions. Academy of Management Journal, 53(4), 723–742.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Conti, A. (2018). Entrepreneurial finance and the effects of restrictions on government R&D subsidies. Organization Science, 29(1), 134–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Dallas, L. L. (2011). Short-termism, the financial crisis, and corporate governance. Journal of Corporation Law, 37, 264–364.Google Scholar
  31. Davis, G. F. (2009). Managed by the markets: How finance reshaped America. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Davis, G. F. (2010). After the ownership society: Another world is possible. Research in the Sociology of Organizations, 30B, 331–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Davis, G. F. (2013). After the corporation. Politics and Society, 41(2), 283–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Davis, G. F. (2016). The vanishing American corporation: Navigating the hazards of a new economy. Oakland: Berrett-Koehler.Google Scholar
  35. Deeg, R. (2009). The rise of internal capitalist diversity? Changing patterns of finance and corporate governance in Europe. Economy and Society, 38(4), 552–579.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Dencker, J. C., & Fang, C. (2016). Rent seeking and the transformation of employment relationships: The effect of corporate restructuring on wage patterns, determinants, and inequality. American Sociological Review, 81(3), 467–487.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Diamond, D., & Rajan, R. G. (2001). Liquidity risk, liquidity creation, and financial fragility: A theory of banking. Journal of Political Economy, 109(2), 287–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Dobbin, F. (1992). The origins of private social insurance: Public policy and fringe benefits in America, 1920–1950. American Journal of Sociology, 97(5), 1416–1450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Duménil, G., & Lévy, D. (2004). Capital resurgent: Roots of the neoliberal revolution (D. Jeffer, Trans.). Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  40. Dünhaupt, P. (2017). Determinants of labour’s income share in the era of financialisation. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 41(1), 283–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Easterbrook, F. H., & Fischel, D. R. (1996). The economic structure of corporate law. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  42. Engel, K. C., & McCoy, P. A. (2001). A tale of three markets: The law and economics of predatory lending. Texas Law Review, 80(6), 1255–1381.Google Scholar
  43. Engel, K. C., & McCoy, P. A. (2007). Turning a blind eye: Wall Street finance of predatory lending. Fordham Law Review, 75(4), 2039–2103.Google Scholar
  44. Epstein, G. A. (Ed.). (2005). The financialization of the world economy. Northampton: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  45. Evans, P. (1995). Embedded autonomy. Princeton/London: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  46. Evans, P., & Rauch, J. E. (1999). Bureaucracy and growth: A cross-national analysis of the effects of ‘Weberian’ state structures on economic growth. American Journal of Sociology, 64(5), 748–765.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Fama, E. F., & Jensen, M. (1983). Separation of ownership and control. Journal of Law and Economics, 26(2), 301–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Fernandez, R., & Wigger, A. (2016). Lehman Brothers in the Dutch offshore financial centre: The role of shadow banking in increasing leverage and facilitating debt. Economy and Society, 45(3–4), 407–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Fligstein, N., & Goldstein, A. (2015). The emergence of a finance culture in American households, 1989–2007. Socio-Economic Review, 13(3), 575–601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Frenette, A. (2013). Making the intern economy: Role and career challenges of the music industry intern. Work and Occupations, 40(4), 364–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Friedman, G. (2014). Workers without employers: Shadow corporations and the rise of the gig economy. Review of Keynesian Economics, 2(2), 171–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Fuller, G. W. (2016). The great debt transformation: Households, financialization, and policy responses. New York/Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Galison, P. (1997). Image and logic: A material culture of microphysics. Chicago/London: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  54. Garvey, G. T., & Swan, P. L. (1994). The economics of corporate governance: Beyond the Marshallian firm. Journal of Corporate Finance, 1(2), 139–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Gilson, R. J., & Gordon, J. N. (2013). The agency costs of agency capitalism: Activist investors and the revaluation of governance rights. Columbia Law Review, 113, 863–927.Google Scholar
  56. Gordon, R. J. (2015). The rise and fall of American growth: The U.S. standard of living since the Civil War. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  57. Granovetter, M. S. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78(6), 1360–1380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Hacker, J. S., Rehm, P., & Schlesinger, M. (2013). The insecure American: Economic experiences, financial worries, and policy attitudes. Perspectives on Politics, 11(1), 23–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Haskel, J., Lawrence, R. Z., Learner Edward, E., & Slaughter, M. J. (2012). Globalization and US wages: Modifying classic theory to explain recent facts. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 26(2), 119–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Howell, S. T. (2017). Financing innovation: Evidence from R&D grants. American Economic Review, 107(4), 1136–1164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Hsu, G. (2006). Jacks of all trades and masters of none: Audiences’ reactions to spanning genres in feature film production. Administrative Science Quarterly, 51(3), 420–450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Hung, H.-f., & Thompson, D. (2016). Money supply, class power, and inflation: Monetarism reassessed. American Sociological Review, 81(3), 447–466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Ivanova, M. N. (2017). Profit growth in boom and bust: The Great Recession and the Great Depression in comparative perspective. Industrial and Corporate Change, 26(1), 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Jacoby, S. M. (1999). Are career jobs headed for extinction? California Management Review, 42(1), 123–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Jolls, C., Sunstein, C. R., & Thaler, R. R. (1998). A behavioral approach to law and economics. Stanford Law Review, 50, 1471–1550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Jung, J. (2016). Through the contested terrain: Implementation of downsizing announcements by large U.S. firms, 1984 to 2005. American Sociological Review, 81(2), 347–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Karabarbounis, L., & Neiman, B. (2014). The global decline of the labor share. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 129(1), 61–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Kilduff, G., Galinksy, A. D., Gallo, E., & Reade, J. J. (2016). Whatever it takes to win: Rivalry increases unethical behavior. Academy of Management Journal, 59(5), 1508–1534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Kristal, T., & Cohen, Y. (2017). The causes of rising wage inequality: The race between institutions and technology. Socio-Economic Review, 15(1), 187–212.Google Scholar
  70. Lamoreaux, N. R. (1998). Partnerships, corporations, and the theory of the firm. American Economic Review, 88(2), 66–71.Google Scholar
  71. Laverty, K. J. (1996). Economic “short-termism”: The debate, the unresolved issues, and the implications for management practice and research. Academic Management Review, 21, 825–860.Google Scholar
  72. Leahey, E., Beckman, C. M., & Stanko, T. L. (2017). Prominent but less productive: The impact of interdisciplinarity on scientists’ research. Administrative Science Quarterly, 62(1), 105–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Leung, M. D. (2014). Dilettante or renaissance person? How the order of job experiences affects hiring in an external labor market. American Sociological Review, 79(2), 136–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Lin, K.-H. (2016). The rise of finance and firm employment dynamics. Organization Science, 27(4), 972–988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. MacKenzie, D., & Spears, T. (2014). ‘A device for being able to book P&L’: The organizational embedding of the Gaussian copula. Social Studies of Science, 44(3), 418–440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Manne, H. G. (1967). Our two corporation systems: Law and economics. Virginia Law Review, 259–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Mears, A. (2015). Working for free in the VIP: Relational work and the production of consent. American Sociological Review, 80(6), 1099–1122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Mian, A., & Sufi, A. (2014). House of debt. Chicago/London: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  79. Mishina, Y., Dykes, B. J., Block, E. S., & Pollock, T. G. (2010). Why ʻgoodʼ firms do bad things: The effects of high aspirations, high expectations, and prominence on the incidence of corporate illegality. Academy of Management Journal, 53(4), 701–722.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Montgomerie, J. (2009). The pursuit of (past) happiness? Middle-class indebtedness and American financialisation. New Political Economy, 14(1), 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Neff, G. (2013). Venture labor: Work and the burden of risk in innovative industries. Cambridge/London: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  82. O’Mahony, S., & Bechky, B. A. (2006). Stretchwork: Managing the career progression paradox in external labor markets. Academy of Management Journal, 49(5), 918–941.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Owen-Smith, J., & Powell, W. W. (2004). Knowledge networks as channels and conduits: The effects of spillovers in the Boston Biotechnology community. Organization Science, 15(1), 5–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Pahnke, E. C., McDonald, R., Wang, D., & Hallen, B. (2015). Exposed: Venture capital, competitor ties, and entrepreneurial innovation. Academy of Management Journal, 58(5), 1334–1360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Palley, T. I. (2013). Financialization: The Economics of Finance Capital Domination. New York/Houndsmills: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Perlin, R. (2011). Intern nation: How to earn nothing and learn little in the brave new economy. London & New York: Verso.Google Scholar
  87. Piketty, T. (2014). Capital in the Twenty-First Century. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Roper, J., Ganesh, S., & Inkson, K. (2010). Neoliberalism and knowledge interests in boundaryless careers discourse. Work, Employment and Society, 24(4), 661–667.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Scott, J. C. (1985). Weapons of the weak: Everyday forms of peasant resistance. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  90. Sklar, M. (1988). The corporate reconstruction of American capitalism, 1890–1916: The market, the law, and politics. Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Smith, V. (2010). Review article: Enhancing employability: Human, cultural, and social capital in an era of turbulent unpredictability. Human Relations, 63(2), 279–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Smith, V., & Neuwirth, E. B. (2009). Temporary help agencies and the making of a new employment practice. Academy of Management Perspectives, 23(1), 56–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Sørensen, M. (2007). How smart is smart money? A two-sided matching model of venture capital. Journal of Finance, 62(6), 2725–2762.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Stanford, J. (2017). The resurgence of gig work: Historical and theoretical perspectives. Economic and Labour Relations Review, 28(3), 382–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Stigler, G. J. (1971). The theory of economic regulation. Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science, 2(1), 3–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Stout, L. A. (2001). Bad and not-so-bad arguments for shareholder primacy. Southern California Law Review, 75, 1189–1210.Google Scholar
  97. Styhre, A. (2016). Corporate governance, the firm and investor capitalism: Legal-political and economic views. Cheltenham/Northampton: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Sullivan, T. A., Warren, E., & Westbrook, J. L. (2006). Less stigma and more financial distress: An empirical analysis of the extraordinary increase in bankruptcy filings. Stanford Law Review, 59(1), 213–256.Google Scholar
  99. Tsui, A. S., Enderle, G., & Jiang, K. (2018). Income inequality in the United States: Reflections on the role of corporations. Academy of Management Review, 43(1), 156–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Turner, A. (2015). Between debt and the devil: Money, credit, and fixing global finance. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  101. Wilmarth Jr., A. E. (2013). Turning a blind eye: Why Washington keeps giving in to Wall Street. University of Cincinnati Law Review, 81(4), 1283–1445.Google Scholar
  102. Wilmers, N. (2018). Wage stagnation and buyer power: How buyer-supplier relations affect U.S. workers’ wages, 1978 to 2014. American Sociological Review, 83(2), 213–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. Zhang, Y., & Gimeno, J. (2016). Earnings pressure and long-term corporate governance: Can long-term-oriented investors and managers reduce the quarterly earnings obsession? Organization Science, 27(2), 354–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. Zinman, J. (2015). Household debt: Facts, puzzles, theories, and policies. Annual Review of Economics, 7, 251–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. Zuckerman, E. W. (1999). The categorical imperative: Securities analysts and the illegitimacy discount. American Journal of Sociology, 104, 1398–1438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alexander Styhre
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Business, Economics and LawUniversity of GothenburgGothenburgSweden

Personalised recommendations