Lateral, supine, and semi-sitting positions are commonly used in vestibular schwannoma surgery. The lateral position, also known as Fukushima position, allows access to the cerebellopontine angle and combines satisfactory surgical exposure with anesthesiological safety. The main advantage of the supine position is that it requires little manipulation of the patient and the tubes. The semi-sitting position is a modern variant of the original sitting position and allows optimal exposure as the intracranial pressure decreases and the gravity ensures better drainage of blood and CSF away from the surgical field. No randomized trials have been conducted to determine which position is the best; all of them are safe but may not be appropriate in all the cases. The surgeon’s experience and preferences may strongly impact on the intra- and postoperative outcomes, even more than the intrinsic characteristics of the position itself. As a consequence, patient positioning should be based on surgical team preference.
KeywordsVestibular schwannoma/lateral position Vestibular schwannoma/supine position Vestibular schwannoma/semi-sitting position
- 1.Di Ieva A, Lee JM, Cusimano MD. Handbook of skull base surgery. New York: Thieme; 2016. xxvii, 978 p.Google Scholar
- 2.Sameshima T. Fukushima’s microanatomy and dissection of the temporal bone. 2nd ed. In: Sameshima T, editor. Raleigh: AF-Neurovideo, Inc.; 2007. 115 p.Google Scholar
- 3.Winn HR. Youmans and Winn neurological surgery. 7th ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier; 2017.Google Scholar
- 4.Quiñones-Hinojosa A, Rincon-Torroella J. Video atlas of neurosurgery: contemporary tumor and skull base surgery. 1st ed. Edinburgh and New York: Elsevier; 2017. xxx, 285 p.Google Scholar
- 6.Boublata L, Belahreche M, Ouchtati R, Shabhay Z, Boutiah L, Kabache M, et al. Facial nerve function and quality of resection in large and giant vestibular schwannomas surgery operated by retrosigmoid transmeatal approach in semi-sitting position with intraoperative facial nerve monitoring. World Neurosurg. 2017;103:231–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar