Advertisement

Flexible Endoscope for IAC Control of Tumor Removal

  • Alberto Campione
  • Carlo Giacobbo Scavo
  • Guglielmo Cacciotti
  • Raffaelino Roperto
  • Luciano Mastronardi
Chapter

Abstract

Using a retrosigmoid approach, the internal auditory meatus cannot be completely opened to expose the fundus in order to preserve the superior and posterior semicircular canals. Therefore, a straight microscopic view cannot provide an adequate visualization of the most lateral part of the internal auditory canal (IAC). Endoscope assistance provides optimal exposure of the fundus of the IAC and improves the ability to evaluate the extent of resection intraoperatively. Our group reported the successful surgical treatment (total resection) of three cases of intracanalicular vestibular schwannomas operated on with an endoscopic-assisted retrosigmoid approach by means of a flexible endoscope (4-mm × 65-cm, Karl Storz, Inc.). The main advantage of the flexible endoscope is the possibility to orient the endoscopic tip directly into the IAC to obtain an optimal visualization of the fundus. As opposed to rigid devices, the flexible endoscope has to be manipulated with two hands. However, this limitation can be easily overcome through good cooperation and synchronicity between the operator and the assistant.

Keywords

Vestibular schwannoma/retrosigmoid approach Vestibular schwannoma/endoscope Vestibular schwannoma/surgery 

References

  1. 1.
    Samii M, Matthies C. Management of 1000 vestibular schwannomas (acoustic neuromas): the facial nerve—preservation and restitution of function. Neurosurgery. 1997;40(4):684–94; discussion 94–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Nonaka Y, Fukushima T, Watanabe K, Friedman AH, Sampson JH, Mcelveen JT, et al. Contemporary surgical management of vestibular schwannomas: analysis of complications and lessons learned over the past decade. Neurosurgery. 2013;72(2 Suppl Operative):ons103–15; discussion ons15.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Myrseth E, Pedersen PH, Møller P, Lund-Johansen M. Treatment of vestibular schwannomas. Why, when and how? Acta Neurochir. 2007;149(7):647–60; discussion 60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Pennings RJ, Morris DP, Clarke L, Allen S, Walling S, Bance ML. Natural history of hearing deterioration in intracanalicular vestibular schwannoma. Neurosurgery. 2011;68(1):68–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Wanibuchi M, Fukushima T, Zomordi AR, Nonaka Y, Friedman AH. Trigeminal schwannomas: skull base approaches and operative results in 105 patients. Neurosurgery. 2012;70(1 Suppl Operative):132–43; discussion 43–4.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Committee on Hearing and Equilibrium guidelines for the evaluation of hearing preservation in acoustic neuroma (vestibular schwannoma). American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Foundation, INC. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1995;113(3):179–80.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Samii M, Metwali H, Gerganov V. Efficacy of microsurgical tumor removal for treatment of patients with intracanalicular vestibular schwannoma presenting with disabling vestibular symptoms. J Neurosurg. 2017;126(5):1514–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Mazzoni A, Zanoletti E, Denaro L, Martini A, Avella D. Retrolabyrinthine meatotomy as part of retrosigmoid approach to expose the whole internal auditory canal: rationale, technique, and outcome in hearing preservation surgery for vestibular schwannoma. Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown). 2018;14(1):36–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Pillai P, Sammet S, Ammirati M. Image-guided, endoscopic-assisted drilling and exposure of the whole length of the internal auditory canal and its fundus with preservation of the integrity of the labyrinth using a retrosigmoid approach: a laboratory investigation. Neurosurgery. 2009;65(6 Suppl):53–9; discussion 9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Fukushima T. Endoscopy of Meckel’s cave, cisterna magna, and cerebellopontine angle. Technical note. J Neurosurg. 1978;48(2):302–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kurucz P, Baksa G, Patonay L, Thaher F, Buchfelder M, Ganslandt O. Endoscopic approach-routes in the posterior fossa cisterns through the retrosigmoid keyhole craniotomy: an anatomical study. Neurosurg Rev. 2017;40(3):427–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Takemura Y, Inoue T, Morishita T, Rhoton AL. Comparison of microscopic and endoscopic approaches to the cerebellopontine angle. World Neurosurg. 2014;82(3–4):427–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Abolfotoh M, Bi WL, Hong CK, Almefty KK, Boskovitz A, Dunn IF, et al. The combined microscopic-endoscopic technique for radical resection of cerebellopontine angle tumors. J Neurosurg. 2015;123(5):1301–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Chovanec M, Zvěřina E, Profant O, Skřivan J, Cakrt O, Lisý J, et al. Impact of video-endoscopy on the results of retrosigmoid-transmeatal microsurgery of vestibular schwannoma: prospective study. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2013;270(4):1277–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Göksu N, Bayazit Y, Kemaloğlu Y. Endoscopy of the posterior fossa and dissection of acoustic neuroma. J Neurosurg. 1999;91(5):776–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Tatagiba MS, Roser F, Hirt B, Ebner FH. The retrosigmoid endoscopic approach for cerebellopontine-angle tumors and microvascular decompression. World Neurosurg. 2014;82(6 Suppl):S171–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Turek G, Cotúa C, Zamora RE, Tatagiba M. Endoscopic assistance in retrosigmoid transmeatal approach to intracanalicular vestibular schwannomas—an alternative for middle fossa approach. Technical note. Neurol Neurochir Pol. 2017;51(2):111–5.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Corrivetti F, Cacciotti G, Scavo CG, Roperto R, Mastronardi L. Flexible endoscopic-assisted microsurgical radical resection of intracanalicular vestibular schwannomas by retrosigmoid approach: operative technique. World Neurosurg. 2018;115:229–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    House JW, Brackmann DE. Facial nerve grading system. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1985;93(2):146–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    de Divitiis O, Cavallo LM, Dal Fabbro M, Elefante A, Cappabianca P. Freehand dynamic endoscopic resection of an epidermoid tumor of the cerebellopontine angle: technical case report. Neurosurgery. 2007;61(5 Suppl 2):E239–40; discussion E40.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Baidya NB, Berhouma M, Ammirati M. Endoscope-assisted retrosigmoid resection of a medium size vestibular schwannoma tumor model: a cadaveric study. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2014;119:35–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Otani N, Morimoto Y, Fujii K, Toyooka T, Wada K, Mori K. Flexible ultrathin endoscope integrated with irrigation suction apparatus for assisting microneurosurgery. World Neurosurg. 2017;108:589–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alberto Campione
    • 1
  • Carlo Giacobbo Scavo
    • 1
  • Guglielmo Cacciotti
    • 1
  • Raffaelino Roperto
    • 1
  • Luciano Mastronardi
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of NeurosurgerySan Filippo Neri Hospital—ASLRoma1RomeItaly

Personalised recommendations