Advertisement

Neighbours and Citizens

  • Jennifer Wilkinson
Chapter
Part of the Palgrave Macmillan Studies in Family and Intimate Life book series (PSFL)

Abstract

This chapter argues that friendship is not simply private and personal, that it has a public life, a life in civil society. The public aspects of friendship are demonstrated both by friends motivating each other to engage in volunteering, and by people creating new friendships in the course of volunteering and civic participation.This argument is intended to counter the influential line of sociological theorizing that portrays individualism as primarily self-interested or narcissistic. A personal concern with friendship or belonging or one’s own identity, it is argued, can connect to public agendas. Giving public expression to issues of personal identity is considered as something other than Richard Sennett’s ‘fall of public man’.

References

  1. Bok, S. (1982). Secrets: On the Ethics of Concealment and Revelation. New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
  2. Boyte, H. (1992). The Pragmatic Ends of Popular Politics. In C. Calhoun (Ed.), Habermas and the Public Sphere (pp. 340–355). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  3. Bulmer, M. (1986). Neighbours: The Work of Phillip Abrams. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Butcher, J., and Smith, P. (2015). Volunteer Tourism: The Lifestyle Politics of International Development. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cockayne, E. (2012). Cheek by Jowl: A History of Neighbors. London: Vintage.Google Scholar
  6. Crouch, M. and McKenzie, H. (2006). The Logic of Small Samples in Interview-Based Qualitative Research. Social Science Information, 45(4), 483–499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Ely, G. (1992). Nations, Publics and Political Cultures: Placing Habermas in the Nineteenth Century. In C. Calhoun (Ed.), Habermas and the Public Sphere (pp. 289–339). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  8. Fraser, N. (1992). Rethinking the Public Sphere: A Contribution to the Critique to Actually Existing Democracy. In C. Calhoun (Ed.), Habermas and the Public Sphere (pp. 109–142). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  9. Friedman, M. (1993). What Are Friends for? Feminist Perspectives on Personal Relationships and Moral Theory. New York: Cornell Press.Google Scholar
  10. Habermas, J. ([1964] 1974). The Public Sphere: An Encyclopedia Article. New German Critique, 3, 49–55.Google Scholar
  11. Habermas, J. (1989). The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society (Trans. T. Burger with assistance by F. Lawrence). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  12. Hill, L., and McCarthy, P. (2004). On Friendship and Necessitudo in Adam Smith. History of the Human Sciences, 17(4), 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Jerrome, D. (1992). Good Company: An Anthropological Study of Old People in Groups. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Lane, R.E. (1994). The Road Not Taken: Friendship, Consumerism, and Happiness. Critical Review, 8(4), 521–554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Lasch, C. (1979). The Culture of Narcissism: American Life in an Age of Diminishing Expectations. New York: Warner Books.Google Scholar
  16. Lein, L. (1983). The Ties That Bind: An Introduction. In L. Lein and M.B. Sussman (Eds.), The Ties That Bind: Men’s and Women’s Social Networks. New York: The Haworth Press.Google Scholar
  17. Morgan, D.H.J. (2009). Acquaintances: The Space Between Intimates and Strangers. Berkshire: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Paine, R. (1999). The Hazards of an Ideal Relationship. In S. Bell and S. Coleman (Eds), The Anthropology of Friendship (pp. 39–58). Oxford: Berg.Google Scholar
  19. Putnam, R.D. (1993). Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Putnam, R.D. (2000). Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
  21. Roberts, J., and Devine, F. (2004). Some Everyday Experiences of Voluntarism: Social Capital, Pleasure and the Contingency of Participation. Social Politics, 11(3), 280–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Rosenblum, N.L. (2016). Good Neighbors: The Democracy of Everyday Life. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Ryan, M. (1979). The Power of Women’s Networks: A Case Study of Female Moral Reform in Antebellum America. Feminist Studies, 5(1), 66–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Sennett, R. ([1974] 2002). The Fall of Public Man. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
  25. Simmel, G. (1906). The Sociology of Secrecy and of Secret Societies. American Journal of Sociology, 11(4), 441–498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Simmel, G. ([1906] 1950). Secrecy. In K.H. Wolff (Trans., Ed. & Introduction). The Sociology of Georg Simmel (pp. 330–344). New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  27. Simmel, G. (1950). Sociability. In K.H. Wolff (Trans., Ed. & Introduction). The Sociology of Georg Simmel (pp. 40–57). New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  28. Smart, C. (2014). Personal Life: New Directions in Sociological Thinking. Polity Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  29. Spencer, L., and Pahl, R. (2006). Rethinking Friendship: Hidden Solidarities Today. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Tavan, G. (2008). “Good Neighbours”: Community Organisations, Migrant Assimilation and Australian Society and Culture 1950–1961. Australian Historical Studies 27(109), 77–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Taylor, R.F. (2004). Extending Conceptual Boundaries: Work, Voluntary Work and Employment. Work, Employment and Society, 18(1), 29–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Weeks, J., Heaphy, B., and Donovan, C. (2001). Same Sex Intimacies: Families of Choice and Other Life Experiments. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  33. Weintraub, J. (1997). The Theory and Politics of the Public/Private Distinction. In J. Weintraub and K. Kumar (Eds.), Public and Private in Thought and Practice: Perspectives on a Grand Dichotomy (pp. 1–42). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  34. Wilkinson, J. (1998). The Public Sphere as a Realm of Sociability: Habermas and the Unravelling the Communist Party of Australia (unpublished PhD Thesis)Google Scholar
  35. Wilkinson, J. (2010). Personal Communities: Responsible Individualism or Another Fall for Public [Man]. Sociology, 44(3), 453–470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Wilkinson, J., and Bittman, M. (2002). Volunteering: The Human Face of Democracy. Sydney: Social Policy Research Centre, University of New South Wales.Google Scholar
  37. Wilkinson, J., and Mar, P. (2006). Volunteering Among Migrants: Civil or Personal Redemption. In Research Symposium, 11th National Conference on Volunteering, Adelaide.Google Scholar
  38. Wilson, J., and Musick, M. (1997). Who Cares? Towards an Integrated Theory of Volunteer Work. American Sociological Review, 62(5), 694–713.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Zappala, G. (2000). How Many People Volunteer in Australia and Why Do They Do It. The Smith Family Research and Advocacy Briefing, Paper No. 4. Sydney: Smith Family.Google Scholar
  40. Zappalà, G. and Burrell, T. (2002). What Makes a Frequent Volunteer? Predicting Volunteer Commitment in a Community Services Organisation. Australian Journal on Volunteering, 7(2), 45–58.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of SydneySydneyAustralia

Personalised recommendations