Advertisement

Beyond the Private Sphere—Focussing on Women’s Friendships

  • Jennifer WilkinsonEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Palgrave Macmillan Studies in Family and Intimate Life book series (PSFL)

Abstract

Sociologists argue that friendship is shaped by the social context. This means that aspects of a social structure, including gender inequality, will affect sociability patterns. In the late-twentieth century, the significance of women’s sociability was described and evaluated primarily in relation to their position within a private domestic sphere. Although this was seen to encourage the development of a distinctive pattern of intimate friendships, it also reflected gender inequalities. In this chapter, discussions of women’s workplace friendships are introduced to explore the significance of context, specifically public work settings, for women’s sociability. Examples of intimate work friendships are considered, raising questions about how women’s friendships are affected by the setting and modified by their increased participation in paid work.

References

  1. Adams, R., and Allan, G. (1998). Placing Friendship in Context. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Allan, G. (1979). A Sociology of Friendship and Kinship. London: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
  3. Allan, G. (1989). Friendship: Developing A Sociological Perspective. Boulder and San Francisco: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  4. Andrew, A., and Montague, A. (1998). Women’s Friendship at Work. Women’s Studies International Forum, 21(4), 355–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Beaumont, C. (1999). Gender, Citizenship and the State in Ireland, 1922–1990. In S. Brewster, V. Crossman, F. Becket, and D. Alderson (Eds.), Ireland in Proximity (pp. 94–108). London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  6. Bittman, M. (1999). Parenthood Without Penalty: Time Use and Public Policy in Australia and Finland. Feminist Economics, 5(3), 27–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bittman, M. (2001). Family and Gender. International Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioral Sciences (pp. 5286–5290). Elsevier. Retrieved from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B0080430767039425.
  8. Bittman, M., England, P., Sayer, L., Folbre, N., and Matheson, G. (2003). When Does Gender Trump Money? Bargaining and Time in Household Work. American Journal of Sociology 109(1), 186–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bliezner, R. (1994). Feminist Perspectives on Friendship: Intricate Tapestries. In D.L. Sollie and L.A. Leslie (Eds.), Gender, Families, and Close Relationships: Feminist Research Journeys (pp. 120–144). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  10. Bulmer, M. (1986). Neighbours: The Work of Phillip Abrams. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Cancian, F.M. (1986). The Feminization of Love. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 11(4), 692–709.Google Scholar
  12. Cass, B. (1994). Citizenship, Work, and Welfare: The Dilemma for Australian Women. Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State and Society, 1(1), 106–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cavendish, R. (1982). Women on the Line. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  14. Chambers, D. (2006). New Social Ties: Contemporary Connections in a Fragmented Society. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Chambers, D. (2013). Social Media and Personal Relationships: Online Intimacies and Networked Friendship. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  16. Connell, R.W. (1985). Theorising Gender. Sociology, 19(2), 260–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Craig, L., and Mullan, K. (2010). Parenthood, Gender and Work‐Family Time in the United States, Australia, Italy, France, and Denmark. Journal of Marriage and Family, 72(5), 1344–1361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Feld, S., and Carter, W.C. (1998). Foci of Activity as changing contexts of Friendship. In R. Adams and G. Allan (Eds.), Placing Friendship in Context (pp. 136–152). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Fine, G. (1986). Friendships in the Workplace. In V.J. Derlega and B.A. Winstead (Eds.), Friendship and Social Interaction (pp. 185–206). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Friedan, B. (1963). The Feminine Mystique. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
  21. Godbeer, R. (2009). The Overflowing of Friendship: Love Between Men and the Creation of the American Republic. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Goldin, C. (1991). Marriage Bars: Discrimination Against Married Women Workers from the 1920s to the 1950s. In P. Higonnet, D.S. Landes, and H. Rosovsky (Eds.), Favorites of Fortune: Technology, Growth, and Economic Development Since the Industrial Revolution. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Gouldner, H., and Symons Strong, M. (1987). Speaking of Friendship: Middle-Class Women and Their Friends. Westport, Connecticut: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
  24. Green, E. (1998). Women Doing Friendship: An Analysis of Women’s Leisure as a Site of Identity Construction, Empowerment and Resistance. Leisure Studies, 17(30), 171–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Green, E., Hebron, S., and Woodward, D. (1990). Women’s Leisure, What Leisure? London: MacMillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Griffiths, V. (1996). Getting in Step: Young Girls and Two Dance Cultures. Women’s Studies International Forum, 19(5), 481–491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hall, M. (1989). Private Experiences in the Public Domain: Lesbians in Organizations. In J. Hearn, D.L. Sheppard, P. Tancred-Sheriff, and G. Burrell (Eds.), The Sexuality of Organization (pp. 124–138). London: Sage.Google Scholar
  28. Hansen, K. (1992). Our Eyes Behold Each Other: Masculinity and Intimate Friendship in Antebellum New England. In P. Nardi (Ed.), Men’s Friendships (pp. 35–58). California: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hansen, K. (1997). Rediscovering the Social: Visiting Practices in Antebellum New England and the Limits of the Public/Private Dichotomy. In J. Weintraub and K. Kumar (Eds.), Public and Private in Thought and Practice: Perspectives on a Grand Dichotomy (pp. 268–302). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  30. Harrison, K. (1998). Rich Friendships, Affluent Friends: Middle-Class Practices of Friendship. In R. Adams and G. Allan (Eds.), Placing Friendship in Context (pp. 92–115). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Hochschild, A.R. (1989). The Second Shift: Working Parents and the Revolution at Home. London: Piatkus.Google Scholar
  32. Hoffman, S.L. (2001). Civility, Male Friendship and Masonic Sociability in Nineteenth Century Germany. Gender and History, 13(2), 224–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hunt, G., and Satterlee, S. (1987). Darts Drink and the Pub: The Culture of Female Drinking. The Sociological Review, 35, 576–601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Jamieson, L. (1998). Intimacy: Personal Relationships in Modern Societies. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  35. Kross, J. (1999). Mansions, Men, Women, and the Creations of Multiple Publics in Eighteenth-Century British North America. Journal of Social History, 33(2), 385–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Lewis, S. (2003). The Integration of Paid Work and the Rest of Life: Is Post-Industrial Work the New Leisure? Leisure Studies, 22(4), 343–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Marks, S.R. (1998). The Gendered Contexts of Inclusive Intimacy: The Hawthorne Women at Work and Home. In R.G. Adams and G. Allan (Eds.), Placing Friendship in Context (pp. 43–70). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  38. Morgan, D.H.J. (2009). Acquaintances: The Space Between Intimates and Strangers. Berkshire: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  39. Murphy, K. (2014). A Marriage Bar of Convenience? The BBC and Married Women’s Work 1923–39. Twentieth Century British History, 25(4), 533–561.Google Scholar
  40. O’Connor, P. (1991). Women’s Confidants Outside Marriage: Shared or Competing Sources of Intimacy? Sociology, 25(2), 241–254.Google Scholar
  41. O’Connor, P. (1992). Relationships Between Women. New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf.Google Scholar
  42. O’Connor, P. (1998). Women’s Friendships in a Post-Modern World. In R. Adams and G. Allan (Eds.), Placing Friendship in Context (pp. 117–135). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  43. Oliker, S. (1989). Best Friends and Marriage Exchange Among Women. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  44. Oliker, S. (1998). The Modernization of Friendship: Individualism, Intimacy and Gender in the Nineteenth Century. In R. Adams and G. Allan (Eds.), Placing Friendship in Context (pp. 18–42). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  45. Pateman, C. (1988). The Sexual Contract. Cambridge: Polity (Basil Blackwell).Google Scholar
  46. Pettinger, L. (2005). Friends, Relations and Colleagues: The Blurred Boundaries of the Workplace. The Sociological Review, 53(2), 37–55.Google Scholar
  47. Pollert, A. (1981). Girls, Wives, Factory Lives. London: MacMillan.Google Scholar
  48. Rosaldo, M.Z. (1974). Woman Culture and Society: A Theoretical Overview. In M.Z. Rosaldo and L. Lamphere (Eds.), Woman, Culture and Society (pp. 17–42). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  49. Rumens, N. (2010). Firm Friends: Exploring the Supportive Components in Gay Men’s Workplace Friendships. The Sociological Review, 58(1), 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Rumens, N., and Kerfoot, D. (2009). Gay Men at Work: (Re)Constructing the Self as Professional. Human Relations, 62(5), 763–786.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Ryan, M. (1979). The Power of Women’s Networks: A Case Study of Female Moral Reform in Antebellum America. Feminist Studies, 5(1), 66–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Sharpe, S. (1984). Double Identity: The Lives of Working Mother. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  53. Simmel, G. (1906). The Sociology of Secrecy and of Secret Societies. American Journal of Sociology, 11, 441–498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Simmel, G. (1950). Sociability (An Example of Pure, of Formal Sociology). In K.H. Wolff (Trans., Ed. and Introduction), The Sociology of Georg Simmel. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  55. Smith-Rosenberg, C. (1975). The Female World of Love and Ritual: Relations Between Women in Nineteenth-Century America. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 1(1), 1–29.Google Scholar
  56. Stone, L. (1977). The Family, Sex and Marriage in England 1500–1800. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
  57. Strikwerda, R.A., and May, L. (1992). Male Friendship and Intimacy. Hypatia, 7, 110–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Thomas, L. (1987). Friendship. Synthese, 72, 217–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Tyler, L. (1994). Mother, Daughter Myth and the Marriage of Death in Steel Magnolias. Literature Film Quarterly Salisbury, 22(2), 98.Google Scholar
  60. Walker, K. (1994). Men, Women and Friendship: What They Say, What They Do. Gender and Society, 8(2), 246–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Westwood, S. (1984). All Day, Every Day: Factory and Family in the Making of Women’s Lives. London and Sydney: Pluto Press.Google Scholar
  62. Willmott, P. (1986). Neighbours, Social Networks, Informal Care and Public Policy. London: Policy Studies Institute.Google Scholar
  63. Winstead, B.A. (1986). Sex Differences in Same-Sex Friendships. In V.J. Derlega and B.A. Winstead (Eds.), Friendship and Social Interaction (pp. 81–99). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Wright, P.H. (1982). Men’s Friendships, Women’s Friendships and the Alleged Inferiority of the Latter. Sex Roles, 8(1), 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of SydneySydneyAustralia

Personalised recommendations