Advertisement

Conclusion

  • Jennifer Wilkinson
Chapter
Part of the Palgrave Macmillan Studies in Family and Intimate Life book series (PSFL)

Abstract

The central theme of this book is that friendship has a public life as well as a private one, and that sometimes these two aspects of friendship are intertwined, as discussions of neighbourhood, volunteering, civil society and work showed. Traditional accounts of women’s friendships tended to locate them within the private sphere. But women’s increased participation in the public domain of work changes the focus. The public setting of work creates a new setting for exploring the patterns of women’s friendships. Friendship makes it possible to have a personal life in public. It has a key role to play in organizing privacy in our lives; and it has a capacity to form community, bringing the individual and the collective together in personal communities.

References

  1. Allan, G. (1979). A Sociology of Friendship and Kinship. London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
  2. Bell, L., and Ribbens, J. (1994). Isolated Housewives and Complex Maternal Worlds—The Significance of Social Contacts Between Women and Young Children in Industrial Societies. The Sociological Review, 42(4), 227–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Blatterer, H. (2014). Everyday Friendships: Intimacy as Freedom in a Complex World. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  4. Blatterer, H., Johnson, P., and Marcus, M.R. (2010). Modern Privacy: Shifting Boundaries, New Forms. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire, and New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  5. Chandra, S. (2018). A Personal Communities Approach to the Relationships and Identities of Gay South Asian Men. Ph.D. thesis (uncompleted). Personal Communication.Google Scholar
  6. Ebert, N. (2017). Reflections on Home and Identity in Late Modernity. In J. Lloyd and E. Vasta (Eds.), Re-imagining Home in the 21st Century (pp. 21–35). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Edgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Eve, M. (2002). Is Friendship a Sociological Topic? European Journal of Sociology, 43(3), 386–440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Fischer, C. (1982). What Do We Mean by ‘Friend’? An Inductive Study. Social Networks, 3, 287–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Forster, E.M. (1979). A Passage to India (Ed. O. Stallybrass). Hammondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
  10. Friedman, M. (1993). What Are Friends for? Feminist Perspectives on Personal Relationships and Moral Theory. New York: Cornell Press.Google Scholar
  11. Hodgson Burnett, F. ([1911] 1951). The Secret Garden. London: Puffin Books.Google Scholar
  12. Honeywell, E. (2017). The Coming Home of Post Industrial Society. In J. Lloyd and E. Vasta (Eds.), Re-imagining Home in the 21st Century (pp. 150–164). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Edgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Jerrome, D. (1984). Good Company: The Sociological Implications of Friendship. The Sociological Review, 32(4), 696–718.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Jerrome, D. (1992). Good Company: An Anthropological Study of Old People in Groups. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Johnson, P. (2010). Images of Intimacy in Feminist Discussions Over Private/Public Boundaries. In H. Blatterer, P. Johnson, and M.R. Markus (Eds.), Modern Privacy: Shifting Boundaries, New Forms (pp. 39–58). New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kaufman, D.R. (1978). Associational Ties in Academe—Some Male and Female Differences. Sex Roles, 4(1), 9–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Morgan, D.H.J. (2009). Acquaintances: The Space Between Intimates and Strangers. Berkshire: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Oliker, S. (1998). The Modernization of Friendship: Individualism, Intimacy and Gender in the Nineteenth Century. In R. Adams and G. Allan (Eds), Placing Friendship in Context (pp. 18–42). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Paine, R. (1970). Anthropological Approaches to Friendship. Humanitas, 6(2), 139–159.Google Scholar
  20. Rumens, N., and Kerfoot, D. (2009). Gay Men at Work: (Re)constructing the Self as Professional. Human Relations, 62(5), 763–786.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Sennett, R. ([1974] 2002). The Fall of Public Man. New York: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  22. Simmel, G. ([1906] 1950). Secrecy. In K.H. Wolff (Trans., Ed. and Introduction), The Sociology of Georg Simmel (pp. 330–344). New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  23. Spencer, L., and Pahl, R. (2006). Rethinking Friendship: Hidden Solidarities Today. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Stone, L. (1977). The Family, Sex and Marriage in England 1500–1800. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
  25. Weintraub, J. (1997). The Theory and Politics of the Public/Private Distinction. In J. Weintraub and K. Kumar (Eds.), Public and Private in Thought and Practice: Perspectives on a Grand Dichotomy (pp. 1–42). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  26. Willmott, P. (1986). Neighbors, Social Networks, Informal Care and Public Policy. London: Policy Studies Institute.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of SydneySydneyAustralia

Personalised recommendations