Advertisement

Value Adding Networks: Paths Towards Future Viability

  • Friedrich Glauner
Chapter
Part of the SpringerBriefs in Business book series (BRIEFSBUSINESS)

Abstract

Corporations will remain viable if they manage to replace our current procedural thinking with systemic thinking that feeds into three more general effects: Decoupled resource creation, sustainable value cycles, and multidimensional, integrated participation networks. To this end they have to rearrange business management and strategies in such a way that they serve the development of value adding networks. Truly viable organizational and network cultures activate the social dimension of shared values in such a way that the value created by the company is reflected in its cultures. As soon as companies recognize and appreciate that the creation of values is their most essential value creation process and their only means of ensuring lasting viability, they will understand that this process needs a different set of instruments than the established indicators used in traditional management (such as balanced scorecards, EFQM). The holistic and integrated instrument panel they need is the values cockpit. It measures the principal and secondary values and the changes in the awareness capital, social capital, and values capital at work.

Keywords

Values Values pyramid Values cockpit Resource creation Participation networks Viable organization Strategy Organization Business model Systemic thinking 

References

  1. Collins, J. (2001). Good to great. Why some companies make the leap… and others don’t. New York: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
  2. Glauner, F. (2017a). Values cockpits. On steering and measuring corporate cultures and values. Heidelberg: Springer.Google Scholar
  3. Glauner, F. (2017b). Compliance, global ethos and corporate wisdom: Values strategies as an increasingly critical competitive advantage. In: J. D. Rendtorff (Ed.), Perspectives on philosophy of management and business ethics. Ethical economy. Studies in economic ethics and philosophy (Vol. 51, pp. 121–137). Berlin: Springer. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-46973-7_9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Glauner, F. (2017c). Ethics, values and corporate cultures: A Wittgensteinian approach in understanding corporate action. In N. Capeldi, S. O. Idowu, & R. Schmidpeter (Eds.), Dimensional corporate governance: An inclusive approach. CSR, sustainability, ethics & governance (pp. 49–59). Berlin: Springer. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-56182-0_4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Glauner, F. (2017d). Ressourcenschöpfende Mehrwertkreisläufe. Die Logik zukunftsfähiger Geschäftsmodelle. In P. Bungard (Ed.), CSR und Geschäftsmodelle. Management-Reihe corporate social responsibility (pp. 57–100). Berlin: Springer. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-52882-2_4Google Scholar
  6. Mewes, W. (1971). Kybernetische Managementlehre (EKS). Frankfurt am Main: Mewes Verlag.Google Scholar
  7. Osterwalder, A., & Pigneur, Y. (2010). Business model generation: A handbook for visionaries, game changers, and challengers. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Friedrich Glauner
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Cultural ImagesGrafenaschauGermany
  2. 2.Weltethos Institut/Global Ethic InstituteEberhard Karls Universität TübingenTübingenGermany

Personalised recommendations