Advertisement

Manipulative Abduction, External Semiotic Anchors, and Blended Cognition

  • Lorenzo MagnaniEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Springer Series in Cognitive and Neural Systems book series (SSCNS, volume 12)

Abstract

This article aims at introducing the concept of manipulative abduction, by showing how we can find at various levels of cognitive activity various methods of manipulative constructivity. From this perspective, also creativity and discovery are no longer seen as mysterious irrational processes, but, thanks to constructive accounts, they are viewed as complex relationships among different inferential steps that can be clearly analyzed and identified. I maintain that the analysis of the blending of external and internal representations and of what I have called epistemic mediators is important not only to delineate the actual practice of manipulative abduction but also to further enhance the development of programs computationally adequate in rediscovering or discovering for the first time, for example, scientific hypotheses or mathematical theorems and to favor the design of more realistic and efficient robots. I will focus on those particular kinds of abductive cognition that resort to the existence of extra-theoretical ways of thinking – thinking through doing – centering the attention to the fact that many cognitive processes are centered on “external representations,” as a means to create communicable accounts of new experiences ready to be integrated into previously existing systems of experimental and theoretical practices.

Keywords

Cognitive blending Material blending Manipulative abduction External representations External semiotic anchors Epistemic mediators Iconic brains Reembodiment Creativity 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Parts of this article were originally published in Chapters 1 and 3 of the book Abductive Cognition. The Epistemological and Eco-Cognitive Dimensions of Hypothetical Reasoning, Springer, Heidelberg, 2009. I also reused with permission: the section “Constructing Meaning through Mimetic and External Objects” of L. Magnani, Semiotic brains and artificial minds. How brains make up material cognitive systems, in: R. Gudwin and J. Queiroz, eds., Semiotics and Intelligent Systems Development, Hershey, PA, pp. 1–41, Ⓒ2007 IGI Global; the sections 3 and 4 of L. Magnani, Multimodal abduction. External semiotic anchors and hybrid representations, Logic Journal of the IGPL 14(2): 107–136, Ⓒ2006 Oxford University Press; the sections 4 and 5 of L. Magnani, External diagrammatization and iconic brain co-evolution, Semiotica 186(1/4): 213–238, Ⓒ Magnani (2011) Walter De Gruyter. For the instructive criticisms and precedent discussions and correspondence that helped me to develop my analysis of manipulative abduction and distributed cognition, I am indebted and grateful to John Woods, Atocha Aliseda, Woosuk Park, Luís Moniz Pereira, Paul Thagard, Ping Li, Athanassios Raftopoulos, Michael Hoffmann, Gerhard Schurz, Walter Carnielli, Akinori Abe, Yukio Ohsawa, Cameron Shelley, Oliver Ray, John Josephson, and Ferdinand D. Rivera and to my collaborators Tommaso Bertolotti and Selene Arfini.

References

  1. Addis TR, Gooding D (2008) Simulation methods for an abductive system in science. Found Sci 13(1):37–52. Special issue edited by L. Magnani “Tracking irrational sets. Science, technology, ethics”, Proceedings of the international conference “Model-based reasoning in science and engineering” – MBR04Google Scholar
  2. Agree P, Chapman D (1990) What are plans for? In: Maes P (ed) Designing autonomous agents. The MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 17–34Google Scholar
  3. Anderson ML (2003) Embodied cognition: a field guide. Artif Intell 149(1):91–130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Arrighi C, Ferrario R (2008) Abductive reasoning, interpretation and collaborative processes. Found Sci 13(1):75–87. Special issue edited by L. Magnani “Tracking irrational sets. Science, technology, ethics”, Proceedings of the international conference “Model-based reasoning in science and engineering” – MBR04Google Scholar
  5. Backhtin M (1982) The dialogic imagination: four essays by Bakhtin MM. The University of Texas Press, AustinGoogle Scholar
  6. Bacon F (2000) The new organon [1620]. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Barsalou LW, Niedenthal PM, Barbey AK, Ruppert JM (2003) Social embodiment. In: Ross BH (ed) The psychology of learning and motivation, vol 43. Academic, San Diego, pp 43–92Google Scholar
  8. Brent J (2000) A brief introduction to the life and thought of Charles Sanders Peirce. In: Muller J, Brent J (eds) Peirce, semiosis, and psychoanalysis. John Hopkins, Baltimore/London, pp 1–14Google Scholar
  9. Brooks RA (1991) Intelligence without representation. Artif Intell 47:139–159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Brooks RA, Stein L (1994) Building brains for bodies. Auton Robot 1:7–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Callagher S (2005) How the body shapes the mind. Oxford University Press, OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Callon M (1994) Four models for the dynamics of science. In: Jasanoff S, Markle GE, Petersen JC, Pinch TJ (eds) Handbook of science and technology studies. Sage, Los Angeles, pp 29–63Google Scholar
  13. Callon M (1997) Society in the making: the study of technology as a tool for sociological analysis. In: Bjiker WE, Hughes TP, Pinch T (eds) The social construction of technological systems. The MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 83–106Google Scholar
  14. Callon M, Latour B (1992) Don’t throw the baby out with the bath school! A reply to Collins and Yearley. In: Pickering A (ed) Science as practice and culture. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago/London, pp 343–368Google Scholar
  15. Chandrasekharan S (2009) Building to discover: a common coding model. Cogn Sci 33:1059–1086CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Clancey WJ (2002) Simulating activities: relating motives, deliberation, and attentive coordination. Cogn Syst Res 3(1–4):471–500CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Clark A (2008) Supersizing the mind. Embodiment, action, and cognitive extension. Oxford University Press, Oxford/New YorkGoogle Scholar
  18. Clark A, Chalmers DJ (1998) The extended mind. Analysis 58:10–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Colapietro V (2000) Further consequences of a singular capacity. In: Muller J, Brent J (eds) Peirce, semiosis, and psychoanalysis. John Hopkins, Baltimore/London, pp 136–58Google Scholar
  20. Colapietro V (2005) Conjectures concerning an uncertain faculty. Semiotica 153(1/4):413–430Google Scholar
  21. Davidson D (2001) Subjective, intersubjective, objective. Clarendon Press, OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Decety J (1996) Do imagined and executed actions share the same neural substrate? Cogn Brain Res 3:87–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Decety J, Grèzes J (2006) The power of simulation: imagining one’s own and other behavior. Brain Res 1079:4–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Elveton R (2005) What is embodiment? In: Magnani L, Dossena R (eds) Computing, philosophy and cognition. College Publications, London, pp 243–258Google Scholar
  25. Enfield N (2005) The body as a cognitive artifact in kinship representations: hand gestures diagrams by speakers of Lao. Curr Anthropol 46:51–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Fauconnier G (2005) Compression and emergent structure. Lang Linguist 6(4):523–538Google Scholar
  27. Fauconnier G, Turner M (2003) The way we think. Basic Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  28. Franklin IR (2005) Exploratory experiments. Philos Sci 72:888–899CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Frith C, Dolan R (1996) The role of the prefrontal cortex in higher cognitive functions. Cogn Brain Res 5:175–181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Fusaroli R (2007) A Peircean contribution to the contemporary debate on perception: the sensorimotor theory and diagrams. Presented at the “9th world congress of IASS/AIS, communication: understanding/misunderstanding”, Helsinki, June 2007Google Scholar
  31. Gooding D (1990) Experiment and the making of meaning. Kluwer, DordrechtCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Grush R (2004) The emulation theory of representation: motor control, imagery, and perception. Behav Brain Sci 27:377–442CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Grush R (2007) Agency, emulation and other minds. Cogn Semiot 0:49–67Google Scholar
  34. Hesslow G (2002) Conscious thought as simulation of behaviour and perception. Trends Cogn Sci 6:242–247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Hoffmann MHG (2003) Peirce’s diagrammatic reasoning as a solution of the learning paradox. In: Debrock G (ed) Process pragmatism: essays on a quiet philosophical revolution. Rodopi Press, Amsterdam, pp 121–143Google Scholar
  36. Hoffmann MHG (2004) How to get it. Diagrammatic reasoning as a tool for knowledge development and its pragmatic dimension. Found Sci 9:285–305CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Hutchins E (1995) Cognition in the wild. The MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  38. Hutchins E (2005) Material anchors for conceptual blends. J Pragmat 37:1555–1577CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Jeannerod M (2001) Neural simulation of action. NeuroImage 14:S103–S109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Kant I (1929) Critique of pure reason. MacMillan, London. Translated by N. Kemp Smith, originally published 1787, reprint 1998Google Scholar
  41. Kirsh D, Maglio P (1994) On distinguishing epistemic from pragmatic action. Cogn Sci 18:513–549CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Kruijff G (2005) Peirce’s late theory of abduction: a comprehensive account. Semiotica 153(1/4):431–454Google Scholar
  43. Latour J (1987) Science in action: how to follow scientists and engineers through society. Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  44. Latour J (1988) The pasteurization of France. Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  45. Law J (1993) Modernity, myth, and materialism. Blackwell, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  46. Määttänen P (1997) Intelligence, agency, and interaction. In: Grahne G (ed) Sixth scandinavian conference on artificial intelligence. IOS Press, Amsterdam, pp 52–58Google Scholar
  47. Määttänen P (2010) Habits as vehicles of cognition. In: Bergman M, Paavola S, Pietarinen A, Rydenfelt H (eds) Ideas of action. Proceedings of the applying peirce conference. Nordic studies in pragmatism 1, Helsinki, pp 201–210Google Scholar
  48. Magnani L (2001a) Abduction, reason, and science. Processes of discovery and explanation. Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Magnani L (2001b) Philosophy and geometry. Theoretical and historical issues. Kluwer Academic Publisher, DordrechtCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Magnani L (2002) Epistemic mediators and model-based discovery in science. In: Magnani L, Nersessian NJ (eds) Model-based reasoning: science, technology, values. Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, New York, pp 305–329CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Magnani L (2005a) Chance discovery and the disembodiment of mind. In: Oehlmann R, Abe A, Ohsawa Y (eds) Proceedings of the workshop on chance discovery: from data interaction to scenario creation, international conference on machine learning (ICML 2005), pp 53–59Google Scholar
  52. Magnani L (2005b) Creativity and the disembodiment of mind. In: Gervás P, Pease A, Veale T (eds) Proceedings of CC05, computational creativity workshop, IJCAIO2005, Edinburgh, pp 60–67Google Scholar
  53. Magnani L (2006) Multimodal abduction: external semiotic anchors and hybrid representations. Logic J IGPL 14(2):107–136. OUP, with permissionCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Magnani L (2007a) Abduction and chance discovery in science. Int J Knowl Based Intelligent Eng 11:273–279CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Magnani L (2007b) Morality in a technological world. Knowledge as duty. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Magnani L (2007c) Semiotic brains and artificial minds. How brains make up material cognitive systems. In: Gudwin R, Queiroz J (eds) Semiotics and intelligent systems development. Idea Group Inc. (now IGI Global), Hershey, pp 1–41. With permissionGoogle Scholar
  57. Magnani L (2009) Abductive cognition. The epistemological and eco-cognitive dimensions of hypothetical reasoning. Springer, Heidelberg/BerlinGoogle Scholar
  58. Magnani L (2011) External diagrammatization and iconic brain co-evolution. Semiotica 86(1/4):213–238. (With permission)Google Scholar
  59. Magnani L (2015) The eco-cognitive model of abduction. ᾿Απαγωγή Now: naturalizing the logic of abduction. J Appl Log 13:285–315CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Magnani L (2016) The eco-cognitive model of abduction. Irrelevance and implausibility exculpated. J Appl Log 15:94–129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Magnani L (2017) The abductive structure of scientific creativity: an essay on the ecology of cognition. Springer, ChamCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Magnani L, Piazza M, Dossena R (2002) Epistemic mediators and chance morphodynamics. In: Abe A (ed) Proceedings of PRICAI-02 conference, working notes of the 2nd international workshop on chance discovery, Tokyo, pp 38–46Google Scholar
  63. Magnani L, Arfini S, Bertolotti T (2016) Intelligence through ignorance? An argument for ignorance-based chance discovery. Int J Adv Intell Paradigms 8(3):327–342CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Maturana H, Varela FJ (1980) Autopoiesis and cognition. The realization of the living. Reidel, DordrechtCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Minski M (1985) The society of mind. Simon and Schuster, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  66. Morgan MS, Morrison M (eds) (1999) Models as mediators. Perspectives on natural and social science. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  67. Nersessian NJ (1992) How do scientists think? Capturing the dynamics of conceptual change in science. In: Giere RN (ed) Cognitive models of science, minnesota studies in the philosophy of science. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, pp 3–44Google Scholar
  68. Nersessian NJ, Chandradekharan S (2009) Hybrid analogies in conceptual innovation in science. Cogn Syst Res 10(3):178–188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Noë A (2005) Action in preception. The MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  70. Noë A (2006) Experience of the world in time. Analysis 66(1):26–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Odling-Smee FJ, Laland KN, Feldman MW (2003) Niche construction. The neglected process in evolution. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  72. O’Regan JK, Noë A (2001) A sensorimotor approach to vision and visual perception. Behav Brain Sci 24:939–973CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Paavola S, Hakkarainen K, Sintonen M (2006) Abduction with dialogical and trialogical means. Log J IGPL 14(1):137–150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Peirce CS (1931–1958) Collected papers of Charles Sanders Peirce. Harvard University Press, Cambridge. vols 1–6, edited by Hartshorne C, Weiss P; vols 7–8, edited by Burks AWGoogle Scholar
  75. Peirce CS (1966) The Charles S. Peirce papers: manuscript collection in the Houghton Library. The University of Massachusetts Press, Worcester. Annotated Catalogue of the Papers of Charles S. Peirce. Numbered according to Richard S. Robin. Available in the Peirce Microfilm edition. Pagination: CSP = Peirce/ISP = Institute for Studies in PragmaticismGoogle Scholar
  76. Peirce CS (1976) The new elements of mathematics by Charles Sanders Peirce. Mouton/Humanities Press, The Hague-Paris/Atlantic Higlands. vols I–IV, edited by C. EiseleGoogle Scholar
  77. Piaget J (1974) Adaptation and intelligence. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  78. Pickering A (1995) The mangle of practice. Time, agency, and science. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago/LondonGoogle Scholar
  79. Pickering MJ, Garrod S (2006) Do people use language production to make predictions during comprehension? Trends Cogn Sci 11(3):105–110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Pinker S (2003) Language as an adaptation to the cognitive niche. In: Christiansen MH, Kirby S (eds) Language evolution. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 16–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Skagestad P (1993) Thinking with machines: intelligence augmentation, evolutionary epistemology, and semiotic. J Soc Evol Syst 16(2):157–180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Sterelny K (2004) Externalism, epistemic artefacts and the extended mind. In: Schantz R (ed) The externalist challenge. De Gruyter, Berlin/New York, pp 239–254Google Scholar
  83. Sutton J (2006) Distributed cognition: domains and dimensions. Pragmat Cogn 14(2):235–247. Special Issue on “Distributed Cognition” edited by Harnad S, Dror IEGoogle Scholar
  84. Svensson H, Ziemke T (2004) Making sense of embodiment: simulation theories and the sharing of neural circuitry between sensorimotor and cognitive processes. In: Forbus KD, Gentner D, Regier T (eds) CogSci 2004, XXVI annual conference of the cognitive science society, Chicago, CD-RomGoogle Scholar
  85. Thagard P, Shelley CP (1997) Abductive reasoning: logic, visual thinking, and coherence. In: Chiara MLD, Doets K, Mundici D, van Benthem J (eds) Logic and scientific methods. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 413–427CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Varela FJ, Thomson E, Rosch E (1991) The embodied mind. Cognitive science and human perspective. The MIT Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Wirth U (1999) Abductive reasoning in Peirce’s and Davidson’s account of interpretation. Trans Charles S. Peirce Soc 35(1):115–127Google Scholar
  88. Wirth U (2005) Abductive reasoning in Peirce and Davidson. Semiotica 153(1/4):1999–2008Google Scholar
  89. Zhang J (1997) The nature of external representations in problem solving. Cogn Sci 21(2):179–217CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG (outside the USA) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Humanities, Philosophy Section and Computational Philosophy LaboratoryUniversity of PaviaPaviaItaly

Personalised recommendations