Advertisement

A Renewed Vision for Professional Development

  • Cathy Box
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter provides a renewed vision for professional development that builds on current models and is grounded in the learning sciences, suggesting design elements including Wiggins and McTighe’s backward design as a framework for planning, and Chappuis’ Seven Strategies of Assessment for Learning to help teachers achieve their professional goals. A renewed vision for professional development includes an emphasis on preparing teachers to provide deeper learning experiences and the development of twenty-first-century skills in their students. To do so, three interconnected constructs should become part of the professional development landscape: formative assessment, an incremental theory of intelligence, and metacognition. These goals for professional development can best be carried out through Professional Learning Communities (PLCs) that offer on-the-job training and support and are common features of US schools.

Works Cited

  1. Blackwell, L. S., Trzesniewski, K. H., & Dweck, C. S. (2007). Implicit theories of intelligence predict achievement across an adolescent transition: A longitudinal study and an intervention. Child Development, 78(1), 246–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Box, M. C. (2008). Formative assessment: Patterns, personal practice assessment theories, and impact on student achievement and motivation in science (PhD Dissertation), Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX.Google Scholar
  3. Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (Eds.). (2000). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.Google Scholar
  4. Calancie, L., Anderson, S., Branscomb, J., Apostolico, A. A., & Lich, K. H. (2018). Using behavior over time graphs to spur systems thinking among public health practitioners. Preventing Chronic Disease, 15, 1–8.Google Scholar
  5. Chappuis, J. (2009). Learning team facilitator handbook: A resource for collaborative study of classroom assessment for student learning. Educational Testing Service.Google Scholar
  6. Chew, S. L. (2014). Helping students to get the most out of studying. In Applying science of learning in education: Infusing psychological science into the curriculum (pp. 215–225).Google Scholar
  7. Darling-Hammond, L., & Bransford, J. (2005). Preparing teachers for a changing world: What teachers should learn and be able to do. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  8. Darling-Hammond, L., Hyler, M. E., & Gardner, M. (2017). Effective teacher professional development. Palo Alto, CA: Learning Policy Institute.Google Scholar
  9. Davis, E. A., Palincsar, A. S., Smith, P. S., Arias, A. M., & Kademian, S. M. (2017). Educative curriculum materials: Uptake, impact, and implications for research and design. Educational Researcher, 46(6), 293–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Duckworth, A. L., Kirby, T. A., Tsukayama, E., Berstein, H., & Ericsson, K. A. (2011). Deliberate practice spells success: Why grittier competitors triumph at the National Spelling Bee. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 2(2), 174–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dweck, C. S. (2007). The perils and promises of praise. ASCD, 65(2), 34–39.Google Scholar
  12. Dweck, C. S. (2010). Mind-sets and equitable education. Principal Leadership, 10(5), 26–29.Google Scholar
  13. Epstein, R. M., Siegel, D. J., & Silberman, J. (2008). Self-monitoring in clinical practice: A challenge for medical educators. Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions, 28(1), 5–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Ericsson, K. A., Krampe, R. T., & Tesch-Römer, C. (1993). The role of deliberate practice in the acquisition of expert performance. Psychological Review, 100(3), 363–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fishman, B. J., Davis, E. A., & Chan, C. K. (2014). A learning sciences perspective on teacher learning research. In The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 707–725). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Furtak, E. M. (2016). The feedback loop: Using formative assessment data for science teaching and learning. NSTA Press.Google Scholar
  17. Hammerness, K., Darling-Hammond, L., & Bransford, J. D. (2005). How teachers learn and develop. In L. Darling-Hammond & J. D. Bransford (Eds.), Preparing teachers for a changing world: What teachers should learn and be able to do (pp. 358–389). San Francisco, CA: Sponsored by the National Academy of Education, Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  18. He, Y., Rohr, J., Miller, S. D., Levin, B. B., & Mercier, S. (2010). Toward continuous program improvement: Using a logic model for professional development school program evaluation. School-University Partnerships, 4(1), 15–28.Google Scholar
  19. Kolodner, J. L. (2006). Case-based reasoning. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 225–242). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Long, J. (2012). Changing teachers’ practice through critical reflection on pedagogy. International Journal of Interdisciplinary Social Sciences, 6(4), 145–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Loucks-Horsley, S., Love, N., Stiles, K., Mundry, S., & Hewson, P. (2003). Designing professional development for teachers of science and mathematics (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press, Inc.Google Scholar
  22. Ludvik, M. J. B. (Ed.). (2016). The neuroscience of learning and development: Enhancing creativity, compassion, critical thinking, and peace in higher education. Sterling, VA: Stylus Publishing, LLC.Google Scholar
  23. National Research Council. (2013). Education for life and work: Developing transferable knowledge and skills in the 21st century. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.Google Scholar
  24. Paul, R. W., Elder, L., & Bartell, T. (1997). California teacher preparation for instruction in critical thinking: Research findings and policy recommendations. Sacramento, CA: California Commission on Teacher Credentialing.Google Scholar
  25. Popham, J. (2008). Transformative assessment. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.Google Scholar
  26. Richmond, G., & Manokore, V. (2011). Identifying elements critical for functional and sustainable professional learning communities. Science Education, 95(3), 543–570.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Riveros, A., Newton, P., & da Costa, J. (2013). From teachers to teacher-leaders: A case study. International Journal of Teacher Leadership, 4(1), 1–15.Google Scholar
  28. Roth, K., Bintz, J., Wickler, N. I. Z., Hvidsten, C., Taylor, J., Beardsley, P. M., … Wilson, C. D. (2017). Design principles for effective video-based professional development. International Journal of STEM Education, 4(1), 1.Google Scholar
  29. Sawyer, R. K. (Ed.). (2014). The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Seidel, T., Stürmer, K., Blomberg, G., Kobarg, M., & Schwindt, K. (2011). Teacher learning from analysis of videotaped classroom situations: Does it make a difference whether teachers observe their own teaching or that of others? Teaching and Teacher Education, 27(2), 259–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Senge, P., Kleiner, A., Roberts, C., Ross, R., Roth, G., Smith, B., & Guman, E. C. (1999). The dance of change: The challenges to sustaining momentum in learning organizations. New York, NY: Doubleday.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Taylor, J. A., Roth, K., Wilson, C. D., Stuhlsatz, M. A., & Tipton, E. (2017). The effect of an analysis-of-practice, videocase-based, teacher professional development program on elementary students’ science achievement. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 10(2), 241–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Wiggins, G., & McTighe, J. (2005). Understanding by design (2nd ed.). Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.Google Scholar
  34. Wiliam, D. (2016). Leadership for teacher learning: Creating a culture where all teachers improve so that all students succeed. West Palm Beach: Learning Sciences International.Google Scholar
  35. Yin, R. (Ed.). (2009). Case study research: Design and methods (Vol. 5, 4th ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Cathy Box
    • 1
  1. 1.Lubbock Christian UniversityLubbockUSA

Personalised recommendations