Advertisement

The Power of Formative Assessment

  • Cathy Box
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter describes the concept and aim of formative assessment, how it is realized in the classroom, and how teachers and students can use it to improve instruction and build student agency. Formative assessment has great potential to raise student achievement and instill, develop, and support metacognition in students, yet educators are often uncertain about methods and means of implementation. Findings from the learning sciences reveal flaws in the instructivist approach to instruction and support the use of formative assessment in a learner-centered, constructivist environment. However, instructionism persists, driven by cultural norms and undergirded by behaviorist theories of practice. Of those who have adopted formative assessment practices, some have distorted its use to conform to their pre-existing behaviorist theories about learners and learning, resulting in conformative assessment or “criteria compliance.” Others have adopted formative assessment as a disparate set of strategies stacked on top of an already bulging curriculum—diluting or negating its effectiveness. When implemented correctly in a learner-centered, constructivist environment however, it has great potential to equip and empower students in their own learning and raise student achievement, even on high-stakes, standardized tests.

Works Cited

  1. Airasian, P. W. (1988). Measurement driven instruction: A closer look. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 7(4), 6–11.Google Scholar
  2. Almqvist, C. F., Vinge, J., Vakeva, L., & Zanden, O. (2017). Assessment as learning in music education: The risk of “criteria compliance” replacing “learning” in the Scandinavian countries. Research Studies in Music Education, 39(1), 3–18.Google Scholar
  3. Andersson, C., & Palm, T. (2017). The impact of formative assessment on student achievement: A study of the effects of changes to classroom practice after a comprehensive professional development programme. Learning & Instruction, 49, 92–102.Google Scholar
  4. Aronson, J., Fried, C., & Good, C. (2002). Reducing the effects of stereotype threat on African American college students by shaping theories of intelligence. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38(2), 113.Google Scholar
  5. Bennett, R. E. (2011). Formative assessment: A critical review. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 18(1), 5–25.Google Scholar
  6. Bergan, J. R., Sladeczek, I. E., Schwarz, R. D., & Smith, A. N. (1991). Effects of a measurement and planning system on kindergartners’ cognitive development and educational programming. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 29, 181–191.Google Scholar
  7. Black, P., Harrison, C., Lee, C., Marshall, B., & Wiliam, D. (2002). Working inside the black box. London: nferNelson Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  8. Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998a). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 5(1), 7–75.Google Scholar
  9. Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998b). Inside the black box: Raising standards through classroom assessment. London: nferNelson Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  10. Box, C., Dabbs, J., & Skoog, G. (2015). A case study of teacher personal practice assessment theories and complexities of implementing formative assessment. American Educational Research Journal – Teaching, Learning and Human Development, 52(5), 956–983.Google Scholar
  11. Box, M. C. (2008). Formative assessment: Patterns, personal practice assessment theories, and impact on student achievement and motivation in science (PhD dissertation), Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX.Google Scholar
  12. Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (Eds.). (2000). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.Google Scholar
  13. Brown, G., & Hirschfeld, G. (2007). Students’ conceptions of assessment and mathematic: Self-regulation raises achievement. Australian Journal of Educational and Developmental Psychology, 7, 63–74.Google Scholar
  14. Butler, R. (1988). Enhancing and undermining intrinsic motivation: The effects of task-involving and ego-involving evaluation on interest and performance. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 58, 1–14.Google Scholar
  15. Chappuis, J. (2005). Helping students understand assessment. Educational Leadership, 63(3), 39–43.Google Scholar
  16. Chappuis, J. (2015). Seven strategies of assessment for learning (2nd ed.). Hoboken, NJ: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
  17. Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2008). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques to developing grounded theory (3rd ed.). Los Angeles: Sage.Google Scholar
  18. Cuban, L. (2007). Hugging the middle: Teaching in an era of testing and accountability, 1980–2005. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 15, 1.Google Scholar
  19. Davis, D., & Neitzel, C. (2011). A self-regulated learning perspective on middle grades classroom assessment. Journal of Educational Research, 104(3), 202.Google Scholar
  20. Davis, G. E., & McGowen, M. A. (2007). Formative feedback and the mindful teaching of mathematics. Australian Senior Mathematics Journal, 21(1), 19–29.Google Scholar
  21. Draganski, B., Gaser, C., Busch, V., Schuierer, G., Bogdahn, U., & May, A. (2004). Neuroplasticity: Changes in grey matter induced by training. Nature, 427(6972), 311–312.Google Scholar
  22. Dunn, K. E., & Mulvenon, S. W. (2009). A critical review of research on formative assessment: The limited scientific evidence of the impact of formative assessment in education. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 14(7), 1–11.Google Scholar
  23. Dweck, C. S. (2006). Mindset: The new psychology of success. New York: Ballantine Books.Google Scholar
  24. Fitzgerald, C. J., & Laurian-Fitzgerald, S. (2016). Helping students enhance their grit and growth mindsets. Journal Plus Education, 14, 52–67.Google Scholar
  25. Fontana, D., & Fernandes, M. (1994). Improvements in mathematics performance as a consequence of self-assessment in Portuguese primary school pupils. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 64, 407–417.Google Scholar
  26. Fox-Turnbull, W. (2006). The influences of teacher knowledge and authentic formative assessment on student learning in technology education. International Journal of Technology & Design Education, 16(1), 53–77.Google Scholar
  27. Frederiksen, J. R., & Collins, A. (1989). A systems approach to educational testing. Educational Researcher, 18(9), 27.Google Scholar
  28. Frederiksen, J. R., & White, B. Y. (1997). Reflective assessment of students’ research within an inquiry-based middle school science curriculum. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the AERA, Chicago.Google Scholar
  29. Furtak, E. M. (2005). Formative assessment in K-8 science education: A conceptual review. Commissioned paper by the National Research Council for Science Learning K-8 Consensus Study.Google Scholar
  30. Gülpinar, M. A. (2005). The principles of brain-based learning and constructivist models in education. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 5(2), 299–306.Google Scholar
  31. Hattie, J. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  32. Ilić, M., & Bojović, Ž. (2016). Teachers’ folk pedagogies. Journal of Arts and Humanities, 5(9), 41–52.Google Scholar
  33. Klenowski, V. (2009). Assessment for learning revisited: An Asia-Pacific perspective. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 16(3), 263–268.Google Scholar
  34. Klute, M., Apthorp, H., Harlacher, J., & Reale, M. (2017). Formative assessment and elementary school student academic achievement: A review of the evidence. Retrieved from https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/edlabs/regions/central/pdf/REL_2017259.pdf
  35. Lamar, S., & Lodge, J. (2014). Making sense of how I learn: Metacognitive capital and the first year university student. International Journal of the First Year in Higher Education, 5(1), 93–105.Google Scholar
  36. Latham, G. P., & Brown, T. C. (2006). The effect of learning vs. outcome goals on self-efficacy, satisfaction and performance in an MBA program. Applied Psychology, 55(4), 606–623.Google Scholar
  37. Li, H. (2016). How is formative assessment related to students’ reading achievement? Findings from PISA 2009. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 23(4), 473–494.Google Scholar
  38. Locke, E. A., & Latham, G. P. (2006). New directions in goal-setting theory. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 15(5), 265–268.Google Scholar
  39. Ludvik, M. J. B. (Ed.). (2016). The neuroscience of learning and development: Enhancing creativity, compassion, critical thinking, and peace in higher education. Sterling, VA: Stylus Publishing, LLC.Google Scholar
  40. Maguire, E. A., Woollett, K., & Spiers, H. J. (2006). London taxi drivers and bus drivers: A structural MRI and neuropsychological analysis. Hippocampus, 16(12), 1091–1101.Google Scholar
  41. Marshall, B., & Jane Drummond, M. (2006). How teachers engage with assessment for learning: Lessons from the classroom. Research Papers in Education, 21(2), 133–149.Google Scholar
  42. McGuire, S. Y. (2015). Teach students how to learn: Strategies you can incorporate into any course to improve student metacognition, study skills, and motivation. Sterling, VA: Stylus Publishing, LLC.Google Scholar
  43. McManus, S. (2008). Attributes of effective formative assessment. Retrieved from Washington, DC: http://www.ccsso.org/Documents/2008/Attributes_of_Effective_2008.pdf
  44. Meisels, S., Atkins-Burnett, S., Xue, Y., Nicholson, J., Bickel, D. D., & Son, S.-H. (2003). Creating a system of accountability: The impact of instructional assessment on elementary children’s achievement test scores. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 11(6), 9.Google Scholar
  45. Messick, S. (1994). The interplay of evidence and consequences in the validation of performance assessments. Educational Researcher, 23(2), 13.Google Scholar
  46. Mytkowicz, P., Goss, D., & Steinberg, B. (2014). Assessing metacognition as a learning outcome in a postsecondary strategic learning course. Journal of Postsecondary Education and Disability, 27(1), 51–62.Google Scholar
  47. Nilson, L. (2013). Creating self-regulated learners: Strategies to strengthen students’ self-awareness and learning skills. Sterling, VA: Stylus Publishing, LLC.Google Scholar
  48. Passmore, C., & Stewart, J. (2006). Evolving ideas: Assessment in an evolution course. In M. McMahon, P. Simmons, R. Sommers, D. DeBaets, & F. Crawley (Eds.), Assessment in science: Practical experiences and education research. Arlington, VA: NSTA Press.Google Scholar
  49. Popham, J. (2008). Transformative assessment. Alexandria, Virginia: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.Google Scholar
  50. Rodriguez, M. C. (2004). The role of classroom assessment in student performance on TIMSS. Applied Measurement in Education, 17(1), 1–24.Google Scholar
  51. Roschelle, J. (1992). Learning by collaborating: Convergent conceptual change. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2(3), 235–276.Google Scholar
  52. Ruiz-Primo, M. A., & Furtak, E. M. (2007). Exploring teachers’ informal formative assessment practices and students’ understanding in the context of scientific inquiry. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(1), 57–84.Google Scholar
  53. Sawyer, R. K. (Ed.). (2006). The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (1st ed.). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  54. Sawyer, R. K. (Ed.). (2014). The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  55. Schoenfeld, A. H. (2011). How we think: A theory of goal-oriented decision making and its educational applications. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  56. Schraw, G., & Dennison, R. S. (1994). Assessing metacognitive awareness. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 19(4), 460.Google Scholar
  57. Schunk, D. H. (1996). Goal and self-evaluative influences during children’s cognitive skill learning. American Educational Research Journal, 33, 359–382.Google Scholar
  58. Shuichi, N. (2016). The possibilities and limitations of assessment for learning: Exploring the theory of formative assessment and the notion of “closing the learning gap”. Educational Studies in Japan: International Yearbook, 10, 79–91.Google Scholar
  59. Sousa, D. A. (2006). How the brain learns (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.Google Scholar
  60. Stiggins, R., & Chappuis, J. (2005). Using student-involved classroom assessment to close achievement gaps. Theory into Practice, 44(1), 11–18.Google Scholar
  61. Swaffield, S. (2011). Getting to the heart of authentic assessment for learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 18(4), 433–449.Google Scholar
  62. Tanner, K. D. (2012). Promoting student metacognition. CBE – Life Sciences Education, 11(2), 113–120.Google Scholar
  63. Torrance, H. (2007). Assessment as learning? How the use of explicit learning objectives, assessment criteria and feedback in post-secondary education training can come to dominate learning. Assessment in Education, 14(3), 281–294.Google Scholar
  64. Torrance, H. (2012). Formative assessment at the crossroads: Conformative, deformative and transformative assessment. Oxford Review of Education, 38(3), 323–342.Google Scholar
  65. Tovar-Moll, F., & Lent, R. (2016). The various forms of neuroplasticity: Biological bases of learning and teaching. Prospects (00331538), 46(2), 199–213.Google Scholar
  66. Weurlander, M., Söderberg, M., Scheja, M., Hult, H., & Wernerson, A. (2012). Exploring formative assessment as a tool for learning: Students’ experiences of different methods of formative assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 37(6), 747–760.Google Scholar
  67. Whiting, B., Van Burgh, J. W., & Render, G. F. (1995). Mastery learning in the classroom. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the AERA, San Francisco.Google Scholar
  68. Wiliam, D. (2011). Embedded formative assessment. Bloomington, IN: Solution Tree Press.Google Scholar
  69. Wiliam, D., Lee, C., Harrison, C., & Black, P. (2004). Teachers developing assessment for learning: Impact on student achievement. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 11(1), 49–65.Google Scholar
  70. Wilson, M., & Sloane, K. (2000). From principles to practice: An embedded assessment system. Applied Measurement in Education, 13(2), 181–208.Google Scholar
  71. Young, A., & Fry, J. D. (2008). Metacognitive awareness and academic achievement in college students. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 8(2), 1–10.Google Scholar
  72. Zimmerman, B. J. (2002). Becoming a self-regulated learner: An overview. Theory into Practice, 41(2), 64–70.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Cathy Box
    • 1
  1. 1.Lubbock Christian UniversityLubbockUSA

Personalised recommendations