Advertisement

Overview of Global Coordination on Bio-Nonproliferation and Its Limits

  • Maria Hecht
  • Stefan KlothEmail author
  • Min-Hi Lee
Chapter

Abstract

More than ever, infectious diseases are an issue of international importance. However, related research, increasing knowledge and technologies often bear dual-use aspects as an immanent risk of misuse, e.g. for development and proliferation of biological weapons. In this chapter, relevant programmes, regulations and binding international agreements are introduced to give an overview of activities concerning bio-nonproliferation.

Keywords

Nonproliferation Biosafety Biosecurity Public health Global health Dual use 

References

  1. 1.
    Definition of dual use research of concern (DURC). 2013 [cited 2017]. Available from: http://www.who.int/csr/durc/en/.
  2. 2.
    John Hart RT. Science, technology, and the biological weapons convention. 2012 [cited 2017]. Available from: https://www.armscontrol.org/act/2012_10/Science-Technology-and-the-Biological-Weapons-Convention#hart.
  3. 3.
  4. 4.
  5. 5.
    Becker-Jakob U. Balanced minimalism – The biological weapons convention after its 7th review conference. PRIF-Report No. 120. 2013.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Regional groups in the biological weapons convention. Available from: http://www.unog.ch/80256EE600585943/%28httpPages%29/73C3C49BEA5621A0C12572DB00477B4A?OpenDocument.
  7. 7.
    Milton Leitenberg RAZ. The Soviet Biological Weapons Program – a history. Cambridge: Harvard University Press; 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Chandré Gould PF. Project Coast: Apartheid’s Chemical and Biological Warfare Programme. Geneva: United Nations Publication; 2002.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Zilinskas RA. Iraq’s biological weapons. The past as future? JAMA. 1997;278(5):418–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    The confidence building measures (CBMs). [cited 2017]. Available from: https://www.unog.ch/80256EE600585943/(httpPages)/5E2E8E6499843CCBC1257E52003ADED4?OpenDocument.
  11. 11.
    Findlay T. Verification and the BWC: last gasp or signs of life? 2006 [cited 2017]. Available from: https://www.armscontrol.org/act/2006_09/BWCVerification.
  12. 12.
    Bansak KC. Enhancing compliance with an evolving treaty: a task for an improved BWC intersessional process. 2011 [cited 2017]. Available from: https://www.armscontrol.org/print/4902.
  13. 13.
    Gerstein DM. National security and arms control in the age of biotechnology: the biological and toxin weapons convention. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield; 2013. p. 234.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    BWC meeting of states parties (10–14 December 2012). [cited 2017]. Available from: https://www.unog.ch/80256EE600585943/(httpPages)/89835CB0A2DAA4A0C1257B6E003415C5?OpenDocument.
  15. 15.
    Eighth Review Conference of the States Parties to the Convention on the Prohibition of the Development, Production and Stockpiling of Bacteriological (Biological) and Toxin Weapons and on Their Destruction. 2016 [cited 2017]. Available from: http://www.unog.ch/80256EDD006B8954/%28httpAssets%29/F277FA6A2B96BA98C125807A005B2F59/$file/2016-1129+Final+report+adv+vers.pdf.
  16. 16.
    Seventh Review Conference of the States Parties to the Convention on the Prohibition of the Development, Production and Stockpiling of Bacteriological (Biological) and Toxin Weapons and on Their Destruction. 2011 [cited 2017]. Available from: http://www.unog.ch/80256EDD006B8954/%28httpAssets%29/C2BAA955E58E15C7C1257D01005260D3/$file/BWC_CONF.VII_07.pdf.
  17. 17.
    Robertson SP, et al. Frontometaphyseal dysplasia: mutations in FLNA and phenotypic diversity. Am J Med Genet A. 2006;140(16):1726–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Convention on biological diversity. Available from: https://www.cbd.int/.
  19. 19.
    Bagley MA, Rai AK. The Nagoya protocol and synthetic biology research: a look at the potential impacts. Washington, DC: Wilson Centre; 2013.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Nagoya Protocol. Available from: https://www.cbd.int/abs/nagoya-protocol/.
  21. 21.
    Access and benefit-sharing clearing-house. Available from: https://absch.cbd.int/.
  22. 22.
    Smallpox. [cited 2017]. Available from: http://www.who.int/csr/disease/smallpox/en/.
  23. 23.
    Damon IK, Damaso CR, McFadden G. Are we there yet? The smallpox research agenda using variola virus. PLoS Pathog. 2014;10(5):e1004108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    WHO Advisory Committee on Variola Virus Research: Report of the Eighteenth Meeting, Geneva. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2017.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Security Council Resolution 1540. 2004 [cited 2017]. Available from: http://www.un.org/en/ga/search/view_doc.asp?symbol=S/RES/1540%282004%29.
  26. 26.
    Security Council Resolution 1540 (2004) [on non-proliferation of nuclear, chemical and biological weapons]. 2004 [cited 2017]. Available from: http://unbisnet.un.org:8080/ipac20/ipac.jsp?profile=voting&index=.VM#x0026;term=sres1540%20(2004)#focus.
  27. 27.
    Australia Group. [cited 2017]. Available from: http://www.australiagroup.net/en/.
  28. 28.
    CBW Events. [cited 2017]. Available from: http://www.cbw-events.org.uk/.
  29. 29.
    Global Health Security Initiative (GHSI). [cited 2017]. Available from: http://www.ghsi.ca/english/index.asp.
  30. 30.
    Global Health Security Initiative. Available from. https://ec.europa.eu/health/preparedness_response/cbrn_threats/ghsi_en.
  31. 31.
    Global Health Security Initiative (GHSI). Available from: https://www.phe.gov/Preparedness/international/ghsi/pages/default.aspx.
  32. 32.
    De Cock KM, et al. The new global health. Emerg Infect Dis. 2013;19(8):1192–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Lee K, Collin J. Global change and health. Maidenhead. Open University Press; 2015.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Rowson M, et al. Conceptualising global health: theoretical issues and their relevance for teaching. Glob Health. 2012;8:36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Kickbusch I. Global health – a definition. Available from: https://www.ilonakickbusch.com/kickbusch/global-health/.
  36. 36.
    Omran AR. The epidemiologic transition. A theory of the epidemiology of population change. Milbank Mem Fund Q. 1971;49(4):509–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Nations U. Millennium development goals report 2015. New York: United Nations; 2015.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    McInnes C, Lee K. Health, security and foreign policy. Rev Int Stud. 2006;32:5–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Heymann DL, et al. Global health security: the wider lessons from the west African Ebola virus disease epidemic. Lancet. 2015;385(9980):1884–901.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    The G8 global partnership against the spread of weapons and materials of mass destruction, in G8 summit. Kananaskis, Canada; 2002.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Report on the G8 global partnership against the spread of weapons and materials of mass destruction, in G8 summit. Deauville, France; 2011.Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    EU CBRN risk mitigation centres of excellence initiative. Available from: http://www.cbrn-coe.eu/.
  43. 43.
    EU CBRN CoE initiative: 5th round table meeting for Central Asia.Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    CBRN Centres of Excellence. Available from: http://www.unicri.it/topics/cbrn/coe/.
  45. 45.
    Global Health Security Agenda. [cited 2017]. Available from: https://www.ghsagenda.org.
  46. 46.
    WHO, editor. International Health Regulations (2005). Geneva: World Health Organization; 2008.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Strengthening Global Health and BiosecurityRobert Koch InstituteBerlinGermany
  2. 2.Federal Information Centre for Biological Threats and Special Pathogens (IBBS)Robert Koch InstituteBerlinGermany

Personalised recommendations