Advertisement

Environmental Impact Assessment

  • Joseph Awange
  • John Kiema
Chapter
Part of the Environmental Science and Engineering book series (ESE)

Abstract

Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) is defined by Munn [2] as the need to identify and predict the impact on the environment and on man’s health and well-being of legislative proposals, policies, programs, projects, and operational procedures, and to interpret and communicate information about the impact. EIA is thus a process, a systematic process that examines the environmental consequence of development actions in advance [3, p. 4]. Glasson et al. [3] have defined the purpose of EIA as an aid to decision making, an aid to the formulation of the development actions, and an instrument to sustainable development . In order to achieve these goals, EIA requires monitoring data that can be used to identify and predict impacts, and also to evaluate the impacts of a given project once approved. Whereas EIA has been traditionally restricted to projects that are deemed to have significant impacts on the environment, it has recently expanded to include strategic environmental assessment (SEA) discussed in Sect. 33.4 and sustainability assessment (SA) presented in Sect. 33.5.

References

  1. 1.
    Gibson J, MacKenzie D (2007) Using global positioning systems in household surveys for better economics and better policy. World Bank Res Obs 22(2):217–241.  https://doi.org/10.1093/wbro/lkm009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Munn RE (1979) Environmental impact assessment: principles and procedures, 2nd edn. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Glasson J, Therivel R, Chadwick A (2005) Introduction to environmental impact assessment. Routledge, 3rd edn. New YorkGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Sweeney International Management Corp (2009) Environmental Impact Assessment for Kelly Cove Salmon Ltd. proposed aquaculture site relocation for Sand Point, Boston Rock, and Hartz Point. Submitted to NS Department of Fisheries & Aquaculture. SIMCorp. File #SW2008-016, 017 & 018Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Perry B, Gessler W (2000) Physical access to primary health care in Andean Bolivia. Social Sci Med 50(9):1177–88.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0277-9536(99)00364-0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kumar N (2007) Spatial sampling for collecting demographic data. America, March, New York, pp 29–31Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Smit B, Spalding H (1995) Methods for cumulative effects assessment. Environ Impact Assess Rev 15(1):81–106.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0195-9255(94)00027-XCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Downes BJ, Barmuta LA, Fairweather PG, Faith DP, Keough MJ, Lake PS, Mapstone BD, Quinn GP (2002) Monitoring ecological impacts: conceipts and practise in flowing waters. Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Munier N (2004) Multicriteria environmental assessment. A practical guide. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Geneletti D (2007) An approach based on spatial multicriteria analysis to map the nature conservation value of agricultural land. J Environ Manage 83:228–235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Antunes P, Santos R, Jorda OL (2001) The application of geographical information systems to determine environmental impact significance. Environ Impact Assess Rev 21:511–535CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ministry of Environment and Energy, Government of Ontarion (1990) Evaluation methods in environmental assessment, pp. 3–12, 33–51; 112–137Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ashton Mining Ltd (1991) In: by, (ed) Mt Weld rare earths project: sites evaluation study for a rare earths Secondary Processing Plant, report prepared. Kinhill EngineersGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Al-Rashdan D, Al-Kloub B, Dean A, Al-Shemmeri T (1999) Environmental impact assessment and ranking the environmental projects in Jordan. Eur J Oper Res 118:30–45.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(97)00079-9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Shopley J, Fuggle R (1984) A comprehensive review of current EIA methods and techniques. J Environ Manage 18:25–47Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Westman WE (1985) Ecology, impact assessment, and environmental planning. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Gough JD, Ward JC (1996) Environmental decision making and land management. J Environ Manage 48(1):1–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Therivel R (2004) Strategic environmental assessment in action. Earthscan, Sterling VAGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Regan HM, Colyvan M, Markovchick-Nicholls L (2006) A formal model for consensus and negotiation in environmental management. J Environ Manage 80(2):167–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Marttunen M, Haimailaiinen RP (1995) Decision analysis interviews in environmental impact assessment. Eur J Oper Res 87:551–563CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Annandale D, Lantzke R (2000) Making good decisions: a guide to using decision-aiding techniques in waste facility siting. Murdoch University, Perth, Australia, Institute for environmental scienceGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Jankowski P (1995) Integrating geographical information systems and multiple criteriadecision making methods. Int J Geogr Inf Syst 9(3):251–273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Malczewski J (2006) GIS-based multicriteria decision analysis: a survey of the literature. Int J Geogr Inf Sci 20(7):249–268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Carver SJ (1991) Integrating multi-criteria evaluation with geographical information systems. Int J Geog Inform Syst 5(3):321–339.  https://doi.org/10.1080/02693799108927858CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Janssen R (2001) On the use of multi-criteria analysis in environmental impact assessment in The Netherlands. J Multi-criteria Decision Anal 10:101–109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Lahdelma R, Salminen P, Hokkanen J (2000) Using multicriteria methods in environmental planning and management. Environ Manage 26:595–605CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Hajikowicz SA (2007) Supporting multi-stakeholder environmental decisions. J Environ Manag  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2007.03.020.
  28. 28.
    Bojorquez-tapia LA, Sanchez-colon S, Martinez AF (2005) Building consensus in environmental impact assessment through multicriteria modeling and sensitivity analysis. Environ Manag 36:469–481CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Kiker GA, Bridges TS, Varghese A, Seager TP, Linkov I (2005) Application of multicriteria decision analysis in environmental decision making. Integr Environ Assess Manage 1(2):95–108.  https://doi.org/10.1897/IEAM_2004a-015.1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Steinemann A (2001) Improving alternatives for environmental impact assessment. Environ Impact Assess 21:3–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Varma VK, Ferguson I, Wild I (2000) Decision support system for the sustainable forest management. For Ecol Manage 128:49–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Sheppard SRJ, Meitner M (2005) Using multi-criteria analysis and visualisation for sustainable forest management planning with stakeholder groups. For Ecology Manage 207:171–187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Vincke P (1992) Multicriteria decision-aid. Wiley, Chichester, UKGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Hajikowicz SA, McDonald GT, Smith PN (2000) An evaluation of multiple objective decision support weighting technique in natural resource management. J Environ Plann Manage 43(4):505–518CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Lantzke R (2006) MCA: the weighting process and overall comments on a weighting process. Environmental Science, Murdoch University. Unpublished. Available at password restricted URL: 16 http://lms.murdoch.edu.au/webct/urw/lc152224987001.tp152225013001/RelativeResourceManager/Template/content/10_13evaluation/three-mca-wt-mthds.pdf (Accessed 15/04/2008)
  36. 36.
    Saaty TL (1980) The analytic hierarchy process. McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Saaty TL (1987) Analytical hierarchy process what it is and how it is used. Math Model 9(3):161–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Ashton Mining Ltd (1992) Mt Weld rare earths project: public environmental review, report prepared by. Kinhill EngineersGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Australian Water Resource (2005) Combined water management area: Gnangara Mound. http://www.water.gov.au/RegionalWaterResourcesAssessments/SpecificGeographicRegion/TabbedReports.aspx?PID=WA_GW_51x. (Accessed on 8/03/2008)
  40. 40.
    Department of Water (2008) Gnangara mound - a unique water resource. http://portal.water.wa.gov.au/portal/page/portal/WaterManagement/Groundwater/Gnangara/ (As of 14/03/08)
  41. 41.
    Water Authority of WA (1995) Review of proposed changes to environmental conditions -Gnangara Mound groundwater resources (Section 46), Water Authority. of WAGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Department of Water (2007) Environmental management of groundwater abstraction from the gnangara roundwater mound 2004–05, annual compliance report to the Environmental Protection Authority, July 2004 to June 2005Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    McArthur WM (1986) The Gnangara Mound landforms, soils and vegetation. Gnangara Mound Environmental Review and Management Programme, Water Authority WAGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Sorensen JC (1971) A framework for the identification and control of resource degradation and conflict in multiple use of the coastal zone. University of Carlifornia, Berkeley, Department of Landscape ArchitectureGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Haklay M, Feitelson E, Doytsher Y (1998) The potential of a GIS-based scoping system: an isreali proposal and case study. Environ Impact Assess Rev 18:439–459CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Mattiske EM (1994) Monitoring the effects of groundwater extraction on native vegetation on the Nortrhern Swan Coastal Plain. EM Mattiske and associatesGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Water Authority of WA (1992) Gnangara Mound vegetation stress study results of investigation, Report No WG 127, Water Authority. of WAGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Groom BPK, Froend RH, Mattiske EM (2000) Impact of groundwater abstraction on woodland, Swan Coastal Plain, WA. Ecol Manage Restor 1:117–124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Jasinska EJ, Knott B (1991) Stability of root mat ecosystem in groundwater stream: cabaret cave. University of Western Australia, Yanchep National Park, WAGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Sadler B, Verheem R (1996) SEA: status, challenges and future directions, Report 53. Ministry of Housing, Spatial Planning and the Environment, The Hague, NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Wood C, Djeddour M (1991) Strategic environment assessment of policiees, plans and programmes. Impact Assess Bull 10(1):3–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Noble B (2002) Strategic environmental assessment of canadian energy policy. Impact Assess Proj Appraisal 20(3):177–188.  https://doi.org/10.3152/147154602781766681CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Spaling H, Smit B (1993) Cumulative environmental change: conceptual frameworks, evaluation approaches, and institutional perspectives. Environ Manage 17(5):587–600.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02393721CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Commonwealth Environmental Protection Agency (1994) Review of commonwealth environmental impact assessment. Canberra: CEPA 10Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    Scace R (2000) Vital relationship: complementary responsibilities of government and proponent in scoping. In: Kennedy A (ed) Cumulative environmental effects management: tools and approaches. Alberta association of professional biologists, Edmonton, pp 31–41Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    BHP Billiton Iron Ore (2005) Marillana creek (Yandi) mine - environmental management plan. Pty Ltd Revision:3Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    EPA (1988) Yandicoogina (Marillana) iron ore project, report and recommendations of the environmental protection authority, bulletin 323. Environmental Protection Authority, Perth, Western AustraliaGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    EPA (1992) Yandicoogina (Marillana) iron ore project - change of ministerial condition due to increase in rate of production, Report and Recommendations of the Environmental Protection Authority, Bulletin 622. Environmental Protection Authority, Perth, Western AustraliaGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    EPA (1994) Yandicoogina (Marillana) iron ore project - change of environmental conditions due to increase in rate of production, Report and Recommendations of the Environmental Protection Authority, Bulletin 738. Environmental Protection Authority, Perth, Western AustraliaGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    EPA (1995) Duplication of iron ore mining operation, Yandi mine ML 270SA, Hamersley Range, 90 km north west of Newman, Report and Recommendations of the Environmental Protection Authority, Bulletin 802. Environmental Protection Authority, Perth, Western AustraliaGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    EPA (Environmental Protection Authority) (2005) Marillana creek (Yandi) mine life of mine proposal, mining leases 270SA and 47/292, 90 km north-west of Newman. Report and recommendation of the EPA, assessment no 1555, Bulletin 1166. Perth, WAGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Government of Western Australia (2003) Hope for the future: the western Australian state sustainability strategy. Department of the Premier and Cabinet Perth, Western Australia. http://www.sustainability.dpc.wa.gov.au/docs/Final%20Strategy/SSSFinal.pdf (Accessed on 2/03/2008)
  63. 63.
    Pope J (2006) What’s so special about sustainability assessment? J Environ Assess Policy Manage 8:v–x.  https://doi.org/10.1142/S1464333206002505CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Pope J, Grace W (2006) Sustainability assessment in context: issues of process, policy, and governance. J Environ Assess Policy Manage 8:373–398.  https://doi.org/10.1142/S1464333206002566CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Pope J, Annandale D, Morrison-Saunders A (2004) Conceptualizing sustainability assessment. Environ Impact Assess Rev 24:595–616.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2004.03.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Morrison-Saunders A, Therivel R (2006) Sustainability integration and assessment. J Environ Assess Policy and Manage 8(3):281–298.  https://doi.org/10.1142/S1464333206002529CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Hacking T, Guthrie P (2008) A framework for clarifying the meaning of triple bottom-line, integrated, and sustainability assessment. Environ Impact Assess Rev 28(2–3):73–89.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2007.03.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Gibson R (2006) Beyond the pillars: sustainability assessment as a framework for effective integration of social, economic and ecological considerations in significant decision-making. J Environ Assess Policy Manage 8(3):259–280.  https://doi.org/10.1142/S1464333206002517CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Lee M (2006) Bridging the gap between theory and practise in integrated assessment. Environ Impact Assess Rev 28:57–78.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2005.01.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    Hacking T, Guthrie P (2006) Sustainable development objectives in impact assessment: why are they needed and where do they come from? J Environ Assess Policy Manag 8(3):341–371.  https://doi.org/10.1142/S1464333206002554CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Ferrarini A, Bodini A, Becchi M (2001) Environmental quality and sustainability in the province of Reggio Emilia (Italy): using multi-criteria analysis to assess and compare municipal performance. J Environ Manage 63:117–131.  https://doi.org/10.1006/jema.2001.0465CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Spatial SciencesCurtin UniversityPerthAustralia
  2. 2.Department of Geospatial and Space TechnologyUniversity of Nairobi NairobiKenya

Personalised recommendations