Advertisement

On Migrating from Present Identity Management Services to EIDAS

  • Ana M. Chiriac
  • Andrei Lăcătuşu
  • Cosmin Popa
  • Ştefan MocanuEmail author
  • Radu Dobrescu
Conference paper
Part of the Studies in Computational Intelligence book series (SCI, volume 803)

Abstract

Identity management is a real problem that currently affects all kind of online applications that require remote identification mechanisms. Basic solutions such as username-password combinations are no longer considered satisfactory especially when it comes to sensitive applications such as e-banking, local or governmental administration, e-health and so on. Several identity management and trust services solutions exist but their main problem is the lack of compatibility and interoperability. In order to overcome these problems, EU issued a regulation (EIDAS) that aims to offer a unitary framework for safe digital interactions between citizens, companies, administrative entities etc. In this paper a practical implementation of a service similar to EIDAS is presented. Current partial results confirm the utility and necessity of an identity management service and can predict the success of EIDAS at EU level.

Keywords

EIDAS eID eSignature Identity management Logistic chain Distributed identity Cooperative chain of trust 

Notes

Acknowledgment

The work has been funded through the research Project COOPID mySMIS-115656 and co-funded through the research project ADSELECT mySMIS-115646.

References

  1. 1.
    Wefel, S., Molitor, P.: User acceptance of token based authentication by single sign-on. Int. J. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1, 70–77 (2012)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Birrell, E., Schnider, F.B.: Federated identity management systems: a privacy-based characterization. IEEE Secur. Priv. 11(5), 36–48 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    European Parliament: Directive 1999/93/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 December 1999 on a Community framework for electronic signatures. Official Journal of the European Communities, 19 January 2000, p. L13/12-13/20 (2000)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Larrivee, B.: E-Signatures in Europe: understanding the legal requirements for proof of intent, White paper (2016)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Gomes de Andrade, N.N., Monteleone, S., Martin, A.: Electronic identity in Europe: legal challenges and future perspectives (e-ID 2020), European Commission JRC scientific and policy reports, JRC78200, 2013, Section 2 (2013)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
  7. 7.
    STORK2. https://www.eid-stork2.eu/. Accessed Dec 2017
  8. 8.
    Kantara Initiative. https://kantarainitiative.org/. Accessed Dec 2017
  9. 9.
    Project Concordia. http://www.projectconcordia.org/. Accessed Dec 2017
  10. 10.
    OpenID. http://openid.net/. Accessed Jan 2018
  11. 11.
    Iacono, L.L., Gruschka, N., Nehren, P.: Mobile personal identity provider based on OpenID connect, trust. In: 14th International Conference on Privacy and security in digital business, TrustBus 2017, Lyon, France, 30–31 August, pp. 19–31 (2017)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Liberty Alliance. http://projectliberty.org. Accessed Dec 2017
  13. 13.
    Strack, H., Wefel, S.: Challenging eID and EIDAS at University Management. In: Hühnlein, D., Roßnagel, H., Schunck, C., Talamo, M. (eds.) Open identity summit 2016. Lecture notes in informatics (LNI), pp. 159–165. Gesellschaft für Informatik, Bonn (2016)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Cuijpers, C.M.K.C., Schroers, J.: EIDAS as guideline for the development of a pan European eID framework in FutureID. GI-Edition Lecture Notes in Informatics, pp. 23–38. Bonner Köllen Verlag, Bonn (2014). ISBN 9783885796312Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    European Parliament: Regulation (EU) No 910/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 July 2014 on electronic identification and trust services for electronic transactions in the internal market and repealing Directive 1999/93/EC. Official Journal of the European Union, OJ L 257, 28 August 2014, pp. 73–114 (2014)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ana M. Chiriac
    • 1
  • Andrei Lăcătuşu
    • 2
  • Cosmin Popa
    • 2
  • Ştefan Mocanu
    • 1
    Email author
  • Radu Dobrescu
    • 1
  1. 1.Faculty of Automatic Control and Computer ScienceUPBBucharestRomania
  2. 2.Ingenios.roBucharestRomania

Personalised recommendations