Prices and Conditions of Access to the Postal Network: The Principle of Non-Discrimination

  • Til RozmanEmail author
Part of the Topics in Regulatory Economics and Policy book series (TREP)


Access to an incumbent postal operator’s (PO) delivery network is an instrument for promoting competition in the postal services market. Competition should create more choices for postal users, reduce prices and improve quality. However, compared to other network industries, the postal sector has numerous differences including low sunk costs, the questionable applicability of a “ladder of investment” theory, and a reduced risk of market failure. In addition, the letter market is declining and thus becoming less attractive for new entrants. Therefore, positive effects of (mandatory) access to the postal network should not be presumed. Access to the PO’s network is not only provided to alternative postal operators but also to businesses, bulk mailers, consolidators and other entities that provide services involving mail preparation and/or carrying out part of the distribution process. POs often offer rebates, most typically based on volume and operational work-sharing and presorting activities.


  1. Craig, P., & de Búrca, G. (2015). EU law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Dunne, N. (2015). Competition law and economic regulation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Dworkin, R. (1967). The model of rules. University of Chicago Law Review, 35(1), 14–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. ERGP. (2016). Report on the development of end-to-end competition and access regulation across the EU Member States in the light of recent jurisprudence concerning rebate regimes in the postal sector.Google Scholar
  5. ERGP. (2017). Report on recommendations and best practices in regulation for access to the postal network of the incumbent operator (in terms of competition, prices and quality of service).Google Scholar
  6. ERGP. (2018). Report on the application in access regulation of the principles of transparency, non-discrimination and proportionality as incorporated in the postal services directive.Google Scholar
  7. Geradin, D. (2015). Is mandatory access to the postal network desirable and if so at what terms? TILEC Discussion Paper. Tilburg: Tilburg University.Google Scholar
  8. Okholm, H. B., et al. (2012). Pricing behavior of postal operators. Copenhagen: Copenhagen Economics.Google Scholar
  9. Parcu, P. L., & Silvestri, V. (2017). Lessons from the postal sector to telecommunications and vice versa. In M. Crew, P. Parcu, & T. Brennan (Eds.), The changing postal and delivery sector. Topics in regulatory economics and policy (pp. 17–33). Cham: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Agency for Communication Networks and Services of the Republic of SloveniaLjubljanaSlovenia

Personalised recommendations