Impedance Characteristics of the Skin-Electrode Interface of Dry Textile Electrodes for Wearable Electrocardiogram
Long-term dynamic Electrocardiogram (ECG) monitoring is considered as one of the main methods of preventing heart diseases. Ag/AgCl wet electrodes, although used clinically, are not suitable for long-time wearing. Dry textile electrodes, however, have won much attention for surmounting these drawbacks. This essay explains the impedance characteristics of the skin-electrode interface of wearable dry textile electrodes for measuring ECG. Specifically, through analyzing the characteristics of dry textile electrodes, the skin-electrode interface equivalent circuit models were built, the textile electrodes were made and the electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) for the skin-electrode interface was measured. Finally, the influence of each parameter to the interface was assessed. The research illustrated that interface of dry textile electrodes were more complicated than that of standard Ag/AgCl electrodes. The interface impedance |Z| and the interface phase were relevant to the signal frequency and the key of descending the interface impedance was to lower the polarization resistance. The textile electrodes have the Constant Phase Angle Element (CPE) behavior due to the dispersion effect of the time constant within the Frequency of ECG measuring.
KeywordsWearable electrocardiogram Textile electrode Skin-electrode interface Constant phase angle element
This work is supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (no. 61572110) and National Key Research and Development Plan of China (no. 2016YFB1001401).
- 8.Andreoni, G., Fanelli, A., Witkowska, I., Perego, P., Fusca, M., Mazzola, M., Signorini, M.G.: Sensor validation for wearable monitoring system in ambulatory monitoring. In: International Conference on Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare, pp. 169–175 (2013)Google Scholar
- 11.Pola, T., Vanhala, J.: Textile electrodes in ECG measurement. In: International Conference on Intelligent Sensors, Sensor Networks and Information, pp. 635–639 (2007)Google Scholar
- 12.Puurtinen, M.M., Komulainen, S.M., Kauppinen, P.K., Malmivuo, J.A.V.: Measurement of noise and impedance of dry and wet textile electrodes, and textile electrodes with hydrogel. In: International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, p. 6012 (2006)Google Scholar
- 15.Taji, B., Shirmohammadi, S., Groza, V., Batkin, I.: Impact of skin-lectrode interface on electrocardiogram measurements using conductive textile electrodes. J. Electrocardiol. 44, 189 (2011)Google Scholar
- 20.Mcadams, E.: Biomedical Electrodes for Biopotential Monitoring and Electrostimulation, pp. 31–124. Springer, US (2011)Google Scholar
- 21.McAdams, E.T., Jossinet, J.: DC nonlinearity of the solid electrode-electrolyte interface-impedance. Innov. Technol. Biol. Med. 12, 329–343 (1991)Google Scholar
- 24.Webster, J.G., Clark, J.W.: Medical Instrumentation: Application and Design, pp. 197–221. Mifflin, HoughtonGoogle Scholar