Advertisement

Data Reliability-Aware and Cloud-Assisted Software Infrastructure for Body Area Networks

  • Joseph ReevesEmail author
  • Carlos MorenoEmail author
  • Ming LiEmail author
  • Chengyu Hu
  • B. Prabhakaran
Conference paper
Part of the Internet of Things book series (ITTCC)

Abstract

Cloud-assisted body area networks have been the focus of researchers in past years as a response to the development of robust wireless body area networks (WBANs). While software such as Signal Processing in Node Environment (SPINE) provide Application Programming Interfaces (APIs) to manage heterogeneous biomedical sensor networks, others have focused on data analysis within networks, laying the groundwork for a scalable cloud-assisted infrastructure. However, recent work in cloud-assisted architectures have revealed several issues, specifically pertaining to applications in the biomedical field. Data-reliability and context aware adaptations are paramount to the success of biomedical applications, due to the field’s data quality needs when seeking in-depth analyses of the data sets. In addition, the cloud server must have a way to organize heterogeneous biomedical body sensor data and perform different types of biomedical body sensor research. The software infrastructure presented in this paper proposes several feedback mechanisms built off of dynamic variables within the system including data importance, data quality and network layout in order to provide researchers an optimal quality of service. The implementation of a domain specific language (DSL) will enable diverse biomedical data processing operations. Furthermore, a robust set of APIs will give researchers the ability to build flexible and unique biomedical applications.

Keywords

Body sensor networks Cloud-assisted Wireless body area networks 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the United States National Science Foundation, CNS division (Award No. 1626586) and NSF of China (Grant No. 61305087).

References

  1. 1.
    El-Hoiydi, A., Decotignie, J.D.: WiseMAC: an ultra low power MAC protocol for the downlink of infrastructure wireless sensor networks. In: 9th International Symposium on Computers and Communications, pp. 244–251. IEEE, Egypt (2004)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Polastre, J., Hill, J., Culler, D.: Versatile low power media access for wireless sensor networks. In: 2nd International Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems, pp. 95–107. ACM, New York (2004)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Fang, G., Dutkiewicz, E.: BodyMAC: energy efficient TDMA-based MAC protocol for wireless body area networks. In: 9th International Symposium on Communications and Information Technology, pp. 1455–1459. IEEE, South Korea (2009)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Garg, M.K., Kim D.J., Turaga D.S., Prabhakaran B.: Multimodal analysis of body sensor network data streams for real-time healthcare. In: International Conference on Multimedia Information Retrieval, pp. 469–478. ACM, New York (2010)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Li, M., Cao, Y., Prabhakaran, B.: A data analysis driven streaming framework for body sensor area networks. In: 8th International Conference on Body Area Networks, pp. 205–208. ICST, Belgium (2013)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
  7. 7.
    The 2net Platform from Qualcomm Life. http://www.qualcommlife.com/wireless-health
  8. 8.
  9. 9.
    Samsung Architecture for Multimodal Interactions: An Open Data Platform for Innovation. http://www.samsung.com/us/globalinnovation/innovation_areas/digital-health
  10. 10.
    Fortino, G., Parisi, D., Pirrone, V., Fatta, G.D.: BodyCloud: a SaaS approach for community body sensor networks. Future Gener. Comput. Syst. 35, 62–79 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Baronti, P., Pillai, P., Chook, V.W.C., Chessa, S., Gotta, A., Hu, Y.F.: Wireless sensor networks: a survey on the state of the art and the 802.15.4 and ZigBee standards. Comp. Commun. 30, 1655–1695 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
  13. 13.
  14. 14.
    Shimmer: a small wireless sensor platform that can record and transmit physiological and kinematic data in real-time. http://www.shimmer-research.com/
  15. 15.
    Kuryloski, P., Giani, A., Giannantonio, R., Gilani, K., Gravina, R., Seppa, V.P., Seto, E., Shia, V., Wang, C., Yan, P., Yang, A.Y., Hyttinen, J., Sastry, S., Wicker, S., Bajcsy, R.: DexterNet: an open platform for heterogeneous body sensor networks and its applications. In: 6th International Workshop on Wearable and Implantable Body Sensor Networks, pp. 92–97. IEEE, California (2009)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Malan, D., Fulford-Jones, T., Welsh, M., Moulton, S.: CodeBlue: An ad hoc sensor network infrastructure for emergency care. In: International Workshop on Wearable and Implantable Body Sensor Networks. United Kingdom (2004)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Jiang, S., Cao, Y., Iyengar, S., Kuryloski, P., Jafari, R., Xue, Y., Bajcsy, R., Wicker, S.: CareNet: An integrated wireless sensor networking environment for remote healthcare. In: 3rd International Conference on Body Area Networks. ICST, Belgium (2008)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kurschl, W., Beer, W.: Combining cloud computing and wireless sensor networks. In: 11th International Conference on Information Integration and Web-based Applications & Services, pp. 512–518. ACM, New York (2009)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Cheng, H., Guo, R., Su, Z., Xiong, N., Guo, W.: Service-oriented node scheduling schemes with energy efficiency in wireless sensor networks. Int. J. Distr. Sens. Netw. 10 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Fotino, G., Fatta, G.D., Pathan, M., Vasilakos, A.V.: Cloud-assisted body area networks: state-of-the-art and future challenges. Wirel. Netw. 20, 1925–1938 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Li, M., Cao, Y., Prabhakaran, B.: Multi-level sample importance ranking based progressive transmission strategy for time series body sensor data. In: 16th International Symposium on a World of Wireless, Mobile and Multimedia Networks, pp. 1–3. IEEE, Massachusetts (2015)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Read, N., Liu, S., Li, M., Wilson, T., Cao, Y., Prabhakaran, B.: Loss resilient strategy in body sensor networks. In: 6th International Conference on Body Area Networks, pp. 99–102. ICST, Belgium (2011)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Levis, P., Madden, S., Polastre, J., Szewczyk, R., Whitehouse, K., Woo, A., Gay, D., Hill, J., Welsh, M., Brewer, E., Culler, D.: Tinyos: an operating system for sensor networks. Amb. Intell. 35 (2005)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Liu, F., Shu, P., Jin, H., Ding, L., Yu, J., Niu, D., Li, B.: Gearing resource-poor mobile devices with powerful clouds: architectures, challenges, and applications. IEEE Wirel. Commun. 20, 14–22 (2013)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    pGBRT: Parallel Gradient Boosted Regression Trees. http://machinelearning.wustl.edu/pmwiki.php/Main/Pgbrt
  26. 26.
    Dean, J., Ghemawat, S.: MapReduce: simplified data processing on large clusters. Commun. ACM 51, 107–113 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Huang, X., Zhao, T., Cao, Y.: PIR: a domain specific language for multimedia information retrieval. Int. J. Multimed. Data Eng. Manage. 5, 1–27 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Computer ScienceCalifornia State UniversityFresnoUSA
  2. 2.School of Computer ScienceChina University of GeosciencesWuhanChina
  3. 3.Department of Computer ScienceThe University of Texas at DallasRichardsonUSA

Personalised recommendations