Thinking of Gender: On the Way to Emancipatory Higher Education in the Globalizing China

  • Weiling DengEmail author
Part of the International and Development Education book series (INTDE)


This chapter locates the activist rationale that originated the contemporary Chinese feminist movement in the predominantly neoliberal era. This means that despite the ambiguous relationship that the feminist movement holds with neoliberalism—a pervasive economized rationality of governing, its most significant contribution is creating a discursive space where education can slow down to care about, rather than suppress, the ambiguities and contradictions of subjective identities. Signifying what Tani Barlow termed “colonial modernity,” the “women’s problem” has led the envisioning of the accountability of modernist Chinese education throughout the twentieth century. The dominant eugenics and biopolitics that frame the mission of education are now being challenged by critical feminist thoughts that reevaluate the ontological meaning of difference from non-heteronormative perspectives. By bringing up the contestation of the philosophies of gendered difference, the movement provides scholarly and educational inquiry a window to recognize and rethink about the sexualized elements in the desire modern China has to portray and emulate the West. To the present, the contestation’s significance lies in its recognition of human’s vulnerability, which challenges the territorialization of “danger” that makes education both intimidating and susceptible.


  1. Barlow, T.E. 2004. The Question of Women in Chinese Feminism. Durham & London: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. ———. 2017. “Jiang Qing, Seriously.” The PRC History Review, 2(4): 1–3.Google Scholar
  3. Biesta, G.J.J. 2013. The Beautiful Risk of Education. Boulder & London: Paradigm Publishers.Google Scholar
  4. Brown, W. 2015. Undoing the Demos: Neoliberalism’s Stealth Revolution. New York: Zone Books.Google Scholar
  5. Foucault, M. 1978. The History of Sexuality, Vol. 1: An Introduction. New York: Random House Inc.Google Scholar
  6. ———. 1984. “Of Other Spaces: Utopias and Heterotopias.” Translated by J. Miskowiec. Diacritics, 16(1): 22–27.Google Scholar
  7. Fraser, N. 2017a. “The End of Progressive Neoliberalism.” Dissent. Retrieved on October 2, 2017 from
  8. ———. 2017b. “Against Progressive Neoliberalism, A New Progressive Populism.” Dissent. Retrieved on October 2, 2017 from
  9. Hershatter, G. 1997. Dangerous Pleasures: Prostitution and Modernity in Twentieth-Century Shanghai. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  10. Ko, D. 2006. Cinderella’s Sisters: A Revisionist History of Footbinding. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  11. Ko, D., L. Liu, and R.E. Karl. 2013. The Birth of Chinese Feminism: Essential Texts in Transnational Theory. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Lanza, F. 2010. Behind the Gate: Inventing Students in Beijing. New York: Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Lewis, T.E. 2014. “Book Review of The Beautiful Risk of Education by Gert J.J. Biesta.” Educational Theory 64 (3): 303–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Liu, L., Z. Wang, and D. Ko. 2005. “From The Women’s Bell to “The Men’s Bell”: Male Subject, Nationalism and Modernity” [从《女界钟》到“男界钟”:男性主体、国族主义与现代性]. In Search on 100 Years of Feminist Thought in China [百年中国女权思潮研究], edited by Z. Wang and Y. Chen, 1–36. Shanghai: Fudan University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Moore, H. 1994. A Passion for Difference: Essays in Anthropology and Gender. Cambridge and Malden: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  16. Neubauer, D., J.C. Shin, and J.N. Hawkins. 2013. “Introduction: Four Hypotheses of Higher Education Development.” In The Dynamics of Higher Education Development in Asia, edited by D. Neubauer, J.C. Shin, and J.N. Hawkins, 1–10. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. O’Brien, P. 1989. “Michel Foucault’s History of Culture.” In The New Cultural History, edited by L. Hunt, 25–46. Berkeley, Los Angeles and Oxford: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  18. Qiu, B. 2017. “Qiu Bai’s Litigation: The Problem Is the ‘Closet,’ Not Me.” The Initium. Retrieved from
  19. Scott, J.W. 1986. “Gender: A Useful Category of Analysis.” American Historical Review, 91(5): 1053–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Spivak, G.C. 1988. “Can the Subaltern Speak?” In Marxism and the Interpretation of Culture, edited by C. Nelson and L. Grossberg, 271–313. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Wang, W., and L. Wu. 2017. “Declaring Textbooks ‘Stigmatize’ Homosexuals: Qiu Bai’s Second Trial Against the Ministry of Education” [称教材“污名”同性恋: 秋白状告教育部案二审开庭]. Bjnews. Accessed July 6, 2018.
  22. Yang, M.M. 1999. Spaces of Their Own: Women’s Public Sphere in Transnational China. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  23. Zeng, J. 2015. “China’s Feminist Five: ‘This Is the Worst Crackdown on Lawyers, Activists and Scholars in Decades.’” The Guardian. Retrieved from

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of California, Los AngelesLos AngelesUSA

Personalised recommendations