Advertisement

General Approach to the Painful Shoulder Arthroplasty

  • Vahid Entezari
  • Surena NamdariEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

Shoulder arthroplasty is an effective treatment for arthritis that improves pain, function, and quality of life. National trends in utilization of arthroplasty indicate that the number of shoulder arthroplasties is increasing steadily with more arthroplasties being performed in younger and more active patients. Because of the rising utilization, there is a downstream effect of a growing burden of complexity of revision surgery. This chapter will provide a general overview on the approach to the management of the painful shoulder arthroplasty.

Keywords

Total shoulder arthroplasty Revision shoulder arthroplasty Failed shoulder arthroplasty Instability Periprosthetic infection 

References

  1. 1.
    Ma VY, Chan L, Carruthers KJ. Incidence, prevalence, costs, and impact on disability of common conditions requiring rehabilitation in the United States: stroke, spinal cord injury, traumatic brain injury, multiple sclerosis, osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, limb loss, and back pain. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2014;95:986–95. e981.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Jain NB, Higgins LD, Guller U, Pietrobon R, Katz JN. Trends in the epidemiology of total shoulder arthroplasty in the United States from 1990-2000. Arthritis Rheum. 2006;55:591–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kim SH, Wise BL, Zhang Y, Szabo RM. Increasing incidence of shoulder arthroplasty in the United States. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011;93:2249–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Dillon MT, Chan PH, Inacio MCS, Singh A, Yian EH, Navarro RA. Yearly trends in elective shoulder arthroplasty, 2005–2013. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2017;69:1574–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Schwartz BE, Savin DD, Youderian AR, Mossad D, Goldberg BA. National trends and perioperative outcomes in primary and revision total shoulder arthroplasty: trends in total shoulder arthroplasty. Int Orthop. 2015;39:271–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Jain NB, Yamaguchi K. The contribution of reverse shoulder arthroplasty to utilization of primary shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elb Surg. 2014;23:1905–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Trofa D, Rajaee SS, Smith EL. Nationwide trends in total shoulder arthroplasty and hemiarthroplasty for osteoarthritis. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2014;43:166–72.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hasan SS, Leith JM, Smith KL, Matsen FA 3rd. The distribution of shoulder replacement among surgeons and hospitals is significantly different than that of hip or knee replacement. J Shoulder Elb Surg. 2003;12:164–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bansal A, Khatib ON, Zuckerman JD. Revision total joint arthroplasty: the epidemiology of 63,140 cases in New York state. J Arthroplast. 2014;29:23–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Day JS, Lau E, Ong KL, Williams GR, Ramsey ML, Kurtz SM. Prevalence and projections of total shoulder and elbow arthroplasty in the United States to 2015. J Shoulder Elb Surg. 2010;19:1115–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Denard PJ, Raiss P, Sowa B, Walch G. Mid- to long-term follow-up of total shoulder arthroplasty using a keeled glenoid in young adults with primary glenohumeral arthritis. J Shoulder Elb Surg. 2013;22:894–900.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Walch G, Young AA, Melis B, Gazielly D, Loew M, Boileau P. Results of a convex-back cemented keeled glenoid component in primary osteoarthritis: multicenter study with a follow-up greater than 5 years. J Shoulder Elb Surg. 2011;20:385–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lo IK, Litchfield RB, Griffin S, Faber K, Patterson SD, Kirkley A. Quality-of-life outcome following hemiarthroplasty or total shoulder arthroplasty in patients with osteoarthritis. A prospective, randomized trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005;87:2178–85.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Deshmukh AV, Koris M, Zurakowski D, Thornhill TS. Total shoulder arthroplasty: long-term survivorship, functional outcome, and quality of life. J Shoulder Elb Surg. 2005;14:471–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Torchia ME, Cofield RH, Settergren CR. Total shoulder arthroplasty with the Neer prosthesis: long-term results. J Shoulder Elb Surg. 1997;6:495–505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hawkins RJ, Bell RH, Jallay B. Total shoulder arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1989;242:188–94.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Carter MJ, Mikuls TR, Nayak S, Fehringer EV, Michaud K. Impact of total shoulder arthroplasty on generic and shoulder-specific health-related quality-of-life measures: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012;94:e127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Franta AK, Lenters TR, Mounce D, Neradilek B, Matsen FA 3rd. The complex characteristics of 282 unsatisfactory shoulder arthroplasties. J Shoulder Elb Surg. 2007;16:555–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Bohsali KI, Bois AJ, Wirth MA. Complications of shoulder arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2017;99:256–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Bohsali KI, Wirth MA, Rockwood CA Jr. Complications of total shoulder arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006;88:2279–92.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Boileau P, Krishnan SG, Tinsi L, Walch G, Coste JS, Mole D. Tuberosity malposition and migration: reasons for poor outcomes after hemiarthroplasty for displaced fractures of the proximal humerus. J Shoulder Elb Surg. 2002;11:401–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Boileau P. Complications and revision of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2016;102:S33–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Otto RJ, Virani NA, Levy JC, Nigro PT, Cuff DJ, Frankle MA. Scapular fractures after reverse shoulder arthroplasty: evaluation of risk factors and the reliability of a proposed classification. J Shoulder Elb Surg. 2013;22:1514–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Gyftopoulos S, Rosenberg ZS, Roberts CC, Bencardino JT, Appel M, Baccei SJ, et al. ACR appropriateness criteria imaging after shoulder arthroplasty. J Am Coll Radiol. 2016;13:1324–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Wiater BP, Moravek JE Jr, Wiater JM. The evaluation of the failed shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elb Surg. 2014;23:745–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Sheridan BD, Ahearn N, Tasker A, Wakeley C, Sarangi P. Shoulder arthroplasty. Part 2: normal and abnormal radiographic findings. Clin Radiol. 2012;67:716–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Alolabi B, Youderian AR, Napolitano L, Szerlip BW, Evans PJ, Nowinski RJ, et al. Radiographic assessment of prosthetic humeral head size after anatomic shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elb Surg. 2014;23:1740–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Ladermann A, Williams MD, Melis B, Hoffmeyer P, Walch G. Objective evaluation of lengthening in reverse shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elb Surg. 2009;18:588–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Sofka CM, Adler RS. Original report. Sonographic evaluation of shoulder arthroplasty. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2003;180:1117–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Gregory T, Hansen U, Khanna M, Mutchler C, Urien S, Amis AA, et al. A CT scan protocol for the detection of radiographic loosening of the glenoid component after total shoulder arthroplasty. Acta Orthop. 2014;85:91–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Arican P, Okudan Tekin B, Sefizade R, Naldoken S, Bastug A, Ozkurt B. The role of bone SPECT/CT in the evaluation of painful joint prostheses. Nucl Med Commun. 2015;36:931–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Mallo GC, Burton L, Coats-Thomas M, Daniels SD, Sinz NJ, Warner JJ. Assessment of painful total shoulder arthroplasty using computed tomography arthrography. J Shoulder Elb Surg. 2015;24:1507–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Yian EH, Werner CM, Nyffeler RW, Pfirrmann CW, Ramappa A, Sukthankar A, et al. Radiographic and computed tomography analysis of cemented pegged polyethylene glenoid components in total shoulder replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005;87:1928–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Pessis E, Sverzut JM, Campagna R, Guerini H, Feydy A, Drape JL. Reduction of metal artifact with dual-energy CT: virtual monospectral imaging with fast kilovoltage switching and metal artifact reduction software. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol. 2015;19:446–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Vidil A, Valenti P, Guichoux F, Barthas JH. CT scan evaluation of glenoid component fixation: a prospective study of 27 minimally cemented shoulder arthroplasties. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2013;23:521–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Huang JY, Kerns JR, Nute JL, Liu X, Balter PA, Stingo FC, et al. An evaluation of three commercially available metal artifact reduction methods for CT imaging. Phys Med Biol. 2015;60:1047–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Shim E, Kang Y, Ahn JM, Lee E, Lee JW, Oh JH, et al. Metal artifact reduction for orthopedic implants (O-MAR): usefulness in CT evaluation of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2017;209:860–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Jungmann PM, Agten CA, Pfirrmann CW, Sutter R. Advances in MRI around metal. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2017;46:972–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Petscavage-Thomas J. Preoperative planning and postoperative imaging in shoulder arthroplasty. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol. 2014;18:448–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Sperling JW, Potter HG, Craig EV, Flatow E, Warren RF. Magnetic resonance imaging of painful shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elb Surg. 2002;11:315–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Aldinger PR, Raiss P, Rickert M, Loew M. Complications in shoulder arthroplasty: an analysis of 485 cases. Int Orthop. 2010;34:517–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Gonzalez JF, Alami GB, Baque F, Walch G, Boileau P. Complications of unconstrained shoulder prostheses. J Shoulder Elb Surg. 2011;20:666–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Lynch NM, Cofield RH, Silbert PL, Hermann RC. Neurologic complications after total shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elb Surg. 1996;5:53–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Barco R, Savvidou OD, Sperling JW, Sanchez-Sotelo J, Cofield RH. Complications in reverse shoulder arthroplasty. EFORT Open Rev. 2016;1:72–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Ladermann A, Edwards TB, Walch G. Arm lengthening after reverse shoulder arthroplasty: a review. Int Orthop. 2014;38:991–1000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Ladermann A, Lubbeke A, Melis B, Stern R, Christofilopoulos P, Bacle G, et al. Prevalence of neurologic lesions after total shoulder arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011;93:1288–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Dodson CC, Craig EV, Cordasco FA, Dines DM, Dines JS, Dicarlo E, et al. Propionibacterium acnes infection after shoulder arthroplasty: a diagnostic challenge. J Shoulder Elb Surg. 2010;19:303–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Shields MV, Abdullah L, Namdari S. The challenge of Propionibacterium acnes and revision shoulder arthroplasty: a review of current diagnostic options. J Shoulder Elb Surg. 2016;25:1034–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Topolski MS, Chin PY, Sperling JW, Cofield RH. Revision shoulder arthroplasty with positive intraoperative cultures: the value of preoperative studies and intraoperative histology. J Shoulder Elb Surg. 2006;15:402–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Villacis D, Merriman JA, Yalamanchili R, Omid R, Itamura J, Rick Hatch GF 3rd. Serum interleukin-6 as a marker of periprosthetic shoulder infection. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014;96:41–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Pottinger P, Butler-Wu S, Neradilek MB, Merritt A, Bertelsen A, Jette JL, et al. Prognostic factors for bacterial cultures positive for Propionibacterium acnes and other organisms in a large series of revision shoulder arthroplasties performed for stiffness, pain, or loosening. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012;94:2075–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Grosso MJ, Frangiamore SJ, Ricchetti ET, Bauer TW, Iannotti JP. Sensitivity of frozen section histology for identifying Propionibacterium acnes infections in revision shoulder arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014;96:442–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Chalmers P, Sumner S, Romeo A, Tashjian R. Do elevated inflammatory markers associate with infection in revision shoulder arthroplasty? J Shoulder Elbow Arthroplasty. 2018;2:1–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Frangiamore SJ, Saleh A, Grosso MJ, Kovac MF, Higuera CA, Iannotti JP, et al. Alpha-Defensin as a predictor of periprosthetic shoulder infection. J Shoulder Elb Surg. 2015;24:1021–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Frangiamore SJ, Gajewski ND, Saleh A, Farias-Kovac M, Barsoum WK, Higuera CA. Alpha-Defensin accuracy to diagnose Periprosthetic joint infection-best available test? J Arthroplast. 2016;31:456–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Berbari E, Mabry T, Tsaras G, Spangehl M, Erwin PJ, Murad MH, et al. Inflammatory blood laboratory levels as markers of prosthetic joint infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010;92:2102–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Bravo D, Wagner ER, Larson DR, Davis MP, Pagnano MW, Sierra RJ. No increased risk of knee arthroplasty failure in patients with positive skin patch testing for metal hypersensitivity: a matched cohort study. J Arthroplast. 2016;31:1717–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Ko JK, Nicholson TA, Hoffler CE, Williams G Jr, Getz C. Metal allergy as a cause of implant failure in shoulder arthroplasty. Orthopedics. 2017;40:e844–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Teo WZW, Schalock PC. Metal hypersensitivity reactions to orthopedic implants. Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2017;7:53–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Morwood MP, Garrigues GE. Shoulder arthroplasty in the patient with metal hypersensitivity. J Shoulder Elb Surg. 2015;24:1156–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Ince A, Seemann K, Frommelt L, Katzer A, Loehr JF. One-stage exchange shoulder arthroplasty for peri-prosthetic infection. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2005;87:814–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Coste JS, Reig S, Trojani C, Berg M, Walch G, Boileau P. The management of infection in arthroplasty of the shoulder. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2004;86:65–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Dilisio MF, Miller LR, Warner JJ, Higgins LD. Arthroscopic tissue culture for the evaluation of periprosthetic shoulder infection. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014;96:1952–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Gee AO, Angeline ME, Dines JS, Dines DM. Shoulder instability after total shoulder arthroplasty: a case of arthroscopic repair. HSS J. 2014;10:88–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Tashjian RZ, Granger EK, Zhang Y. Utility of prerevision tissue biopsy sample to predict revision shoulder arthroplasty culture results in at-risk patients. J Shoulder Elb Surg. 2017;26:197–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Orthopaedic SurgeryRothman Institute at Thomas Jefferson UniversityPhiladelphiaUSA

Personalised recommendations