Advertisement

Problem Solving Olympics: An Inclusive Education Model for Learning Informatics

  • Roberto Borchia
  • Antonella Carbonaro
  • Giorgio Casadei
  • Luca Forlizzi
  • Michael Lodi
  • Simone Martini
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 11169)

Abstract

The paper presents the Olimpiadi di Problem Solving, a mild and inclusive competition aimed to promote computational thinking and general problem-solving in Italian schools. We describe motivation, teaching strategies behind the initiative, as well as its structure, organization and give some sample of the problems proposed to students. We also present some data that show the broad participation of Italian schools to the initiative, and a preliminary analysis of the results obtained by the students in the last 5 editions, which suggests that the competition fosters deep learning of computational thinking knowledge and skills.

Keywords

Inclusive competitions Computational thinking Problem-solving 

References

  1. 1.
    Combéfis, S., Wautelet, J.: Programming trainings and informatics teaching through online contests. Olymp. Inform. 8, 21–34 (2014)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Corradini, I., Lodi, M., Nardelli, E.: Computational thinking in Italian schools: quantitative data and teachers’ sentiment analysis after two years of “programma il futuro”. In: Proceedings of 2017 ACM Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education, ITiCSE 2017, pp. 224–229. ACM, New York (2017). http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/3059009.3059040
  3. 3.
    Dagienė, V.: Sustaining informatics education by contests. In: Hromkovič, J., Královič, R., Vahrenhold, J. (eds.) ISSEP 2010. LNCS, vol. 5941, pp. 1–12. Springer, Heidelberg (2010).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-11376-5_1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Dagienė, V., Futschek, G.: Bebras international contest on informatics and computer literacy: criteria for good tasks. In: Mittermeir, R.T., Sysło, M.M. (eds.) ISSEP 2008. LNCS, vol. 5090, pp. 19–30. Springer, Heidelberg (2008).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-69924-8_2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Davaki, K.: The underlying causes of the digital gender gap and possible solutions for enhanced digital inclusion of women and girls. Technical report, Policy Department for Citizen’s Rights and Constitutional Affairs - European Parliament’s Committee on Women’s Rights and Gender Equality (2018)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kelevedjiev, E., Dzhenkova, Z.: Tasks and training the youngest beginners for informatics competitions. Olymp. Inform. 2, 75–89 (2008)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kiryukhin, V.M.: The modern contents of the Russian national olympiads in informatics. Olymp. Inform. 1, 90–104 (2007)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Raman, R., Vachharajani, H., Achuthan, K.: Students motivation for adopting programming contests: innovation-diffusion perspective. Educ. Inf. Technol. (2018).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-018-9697-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Verdú, E., Lorenzo, R.M., Revilla, M.A., Regueras, L.M. (eds.): A New Learning Paradigm: Competition Supported by Technology. CEDETEL, Sello Editorial, Madrid (2010)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Verhoeff, T., Horváth, G., Diks, K., Cormack, G.: A proposal for an IOI syllabus. Teach. Math. Comput. Sci. 4(1), 193–216 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Wieman, C.: Applying new research to improve science education. Issues Sci. Technol. 29(1), 25–32 (2012). http://www.jstor.org/stable/43315691Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Wing, J.M.: Computational thinking. Commun. ACM 49(3), 33–35 (2006). http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1118178.1118215CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Roberto Borchia
    • 1
  • Antonella Carbonaro
    • 2
  • Giorgio Casadei
    • 2
  • Luca Forlizzi
    • 3
  • Michael Lodi
    • 2
    • 4
  • Simone Martini
    • 2
    • 4
  1. 1.Istituto Tecnico Industriale “Q. Sella”BiellaItaly
  2. 2.Dip. di Informatica–Scienza e IngegneriaUniversità di BolognaBolognaItaly
  3. 3.Dip. di Ingegneria e Scienze dell’Informazione e MatematicaUniversità dell’AquilaL’AquilaItaly
  4. 4.INRIA Sophia-AntipolisValbonneFrance

Personalised recommendations