An Investigation of Italian Primary School Teachers’ View on Coding and Programming
This paper reports the results of an investigation involving almost a thousand primary school teachers in Italy, to explore their views on the terms “coding” and “programming”, and how they are related to their ideas on “computational thinking”.
When directly asked “if coding is different from writing programs”, roughly 2 out of 3 teachers answered “no”. Among the teachers who answered “yes”, almost 160 tried to motivate the difference: a few of them gave admissible explanations, while the others showed various misunderstandings, which we classify and discuss.
By contrast, when asked about their idea of “what coding is”, only 4 out of 10 of the teachers explicitly linked coding to programming, but an additional 2 out of 10 cited an information processing agent executing instructions. The remaining part of the sample did not provide explicit or implicit links between coding and programming.
Our investigation shows that untrained teachers hold misconceptions regarding CS and its related terms. Given the general public and media attention on “coding” in schools, currently taught by existing teachers - mostly not appropriately trained, professional development actions focusing on CS scientific principles and methods are therefore a top priority for the effectiveness of CS education in schools.
KeywordsCoding and programming Primary school teachers Informatics education
We greatly thank teachers and students involved in Programma il Futuro project (coordinated by EN) and Code.org for their cooperation.
We acknowledge the financial support of Engineering, TIM; CA Technologies, De Agostini Scuola, SeeWeb. Other companies have financially supported the project for two school-years only: Samsung Italia; Microsoft Italia; Cisco, Hewlett-Packard, Oracle, Facebook.
Rai Cultura, the culture department of Italian national public broadcasting company, is a media partner of the project since February 2017.
- 2.Barendsen, E., et al.: Concepts in k-9 computer science education. In: ITICSE-WGR 2015, pp. 85–116. ACM (2015)Google Scholar
- 3.Bell, T.: What’s all the fuss about coding? In: ACER Research Conference 2016. Australian Council for Educational Research, Melbourne, Australia (2016)Google Scholar
- 4.Ben-Ari, M.: In defense of programming. In: ITiCSE 2015. ACM (2015)Google Scholar
- 5.Caspersen, M.E., Gal-Ezer, J., Nardelli, E., Vahrenhold, J., Westermeier, M.: The CECE report: creating a map of informatics in European schools. In: SIGCSE 2018 (2018)Google Scholar
- 6.Corradini, I., Lodi, M., Nardelli, E.: Conceptions and misconceptions about computational thinking among Italian primary school teachers. In: ICER 2017 (2017)Google Scholar
- 7.Corradini, I., Lodi, M., Nardelli, E.: Computational thinking in Italian schools: quantitative data and teachers’ sentiment analysis after two years of “Programma il Futuro” Project. In: ITiCSE 2017. ACM, New York (2017)Google Scholar
- 10.Duncan, C., Bell, T., Tanimoto, S.: Should your 8-year-old learn coding? In: Proceedings WiPSCE 2014, pp. 60–69. ACM (2014)Google Scholar
- 11.Italian Ministry of Education, University and Research: National Plan for Digital Education (2016)Google Scholar
- 12.Nardelli, E.: Do we really need computational thinking? Commun. ACM (2018, to be published)Google Scholar
- 13.Prottsman, K.: Coding vs. programming - battle of the terms! (2015). http://www.huffingtonpost.com/kiki-prottsman/coding-vs-programming-bat_b_7042816.html
- 14.Sentance, S.: Why teach computer science in school. In: Sentance, S., Barendsen, E., Schulte, C. (eds.) Computer Science Education. Perspectives on Teaching and Learning in School, chap. 1, pp. 3–4. Bloomsbury Academic, London (2018)Google Scholar
- 15.The Royal Society: After the Reboot: Computing Education in UK Schools. The Royal Society, London (2017)Google Scholar