Advertisement

Orientalism and Anti-Orientalism: Epistemological Approaches to Islam and Violence

  • Mohammed Sulaiman
Chapter
Part of the Middle East Today book series (MIET)

Abstract

The study of the relationship between Islam and violence has been largely dominated by two epistemological approaches. The first is the essentialist, and predominantly Orientalist, approach, which seeks to explain acts of violence by Muslims with reference to an underlying set of features, beliefs and practices that embody the real essence of the Islamic tradition. According to this view, there is a direct and internal relationship between Islam and contemporary Muslim practices of violence. Contrary to this, the second anti-essentialist approach is critical of the Orientalists’ reductionist epistemology and its inability to account for the complex heterogeneity of Islamic interpretations and lived experience. For anti-essentialists, Islam becomes an irrelevant category in the explanation of Muslim violence. Hence, they seek an explanation for this phenomenon not in the classic texts and medieval history of Muslims, but by reference to external factors, such as material contexts and socio-economic conditions. Nonetheless, this leaves entirely unaddressed the Muslim identity of the actors, and whether it is plausible to disregard the relevance of Islam to the explanation of the phenomenon and identity of the actors under discussion (i.e. violence by Muslims).

References

  1. Abou El Fadl, Khaled. 2005. The Great Theft: Wrestling Islam from the Extremists. New York: HarperOne.Google Scholar
  2. Ahmed, Shahab. 2015. What Is Islam? The Importance of Being Islamic. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Al-Azmah, Aziz. 1993. Islams and Modernities. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  4. Anjum, Ovamir. 2007. Islam as a Discursive Tradition: Talal Asad and His Interlocutors. Comparative Studies of South Asia, Africa and the Middle East 27 (3): 656–672.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Asad, Talal. 1986. The Idea of an Anthropology of Islam. Washington, DC: Center for Contemporary Arab Studies, Georgetown University.Google Scholar
  6. ———. 1993. Genealogies of Religion: Discipline and Reasons of Power in Christianity and Islam. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Ayubi, Nazih. 1992. Political Islam: Religion and Politics in the Arab World. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  8. Berman, Paul. 2004. Terror and Liberalism. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
  9. Cavanaugh, William T. 2009. The Myth of Religious Violence. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Demant, Peter. 2006. Islam Versus Islamism: The Dilemma of the Muslim World. Westport: Praeger.Google Scholar
  11. Dubuisson, Daniel. 2003. The Western Construction of Religion. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Eickelman, Dale. 1982. The Study of Islam in Local Contexts. Contributions to Asian Studies 17: 1–18.Google Scholar
  13. El-Zein, Abdul Hamid. 1977. Beyond Ideology and Theology: The Search for an Anthropology of Islam. Annual Review of Anthropology 6: 227–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Esposito, John. 1999. The Islamic Threat: Myth or Reality? Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Fitzgerald, Timothy. 1997. A Critique of Religion as a Cross-cultural Category. Method and Theory in the Study of Religion 9 (2): 91–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. ———. 2000. The Ideology of Religious Studies. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Grosfoguel, Ramon. 2010. Epistemic Islamophobia and Colonial Social Sciences. Human Architecture: Journal of the Sociology of Self-Knowledge 8 (2): 29–38.Google Scholar
  18. Hall, Stuart. 1992. The West and the Rest: Discourse and Power. In Formations of Modernity, ed. Stuart Hall and Bram Gieben, 275–331. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  19. Halliday, Fred. 2003. Islam and the Myth of Confrontation: Religion and Politics in the Middle East. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  20. Harris, Sam. 2004. The End of Faith: Religion, Terror, and the Future of Reason. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
  21. Hitchens, Christopher. 2007. God Is Not Great: How Religion Poisons Everything. New York: Twelve.Google Scholar
  22. Huntington, Sam. 1996. The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order. New York/London/Toronto/Sydney: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
  23. Karsh, Efraim. 2007a. Islamic Imperialism: A History. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  24. ———. 2007b. The Missing Piece: Islamic Imperialism. Israeli Affairs 13 (4): 797–805.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kramer, Martin. 2003. Coming to Terms: Fundamentalists or Islamists? Middle East Quarterly 10 (2): 65–77.Google Scholar
  26. Kundnani, Arun. 2013. The Muslims Are Coming: Islamophobia, Extremism and the Domestic War on Terror. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  27. Lewis, Bernard. 1976. The Return of Islam. Commentary, January 1.Google Scholar
  28. ———. 1990. The Roots of Muslim Rage. Atlantic Monthly, September.Google Scholar
  29. ———. 2002. What Went Wrong? The Clash Between Modernity and Islam in the Middle East. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  30. ———. 2003. The Crisis of Islam: Holy War and Unholy Terror. New York: Modern Library.Google Scholar
  31. Mamdani, Mahmood. 2004. Good Muslim, Bad Muslim: America, the Old War, and the Roots of Terror. New York: Three Leaves Print.Google Scholar
  32. Masuzawa, Tomoku. 2005. The Invention of World Religions. Chicago: Chicago University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Pankhurst, Reza. 2013. The Inevitable Caliphate? A History for the Struggle for a Global Islamic Union. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Pipes, Daniel. 2003. In the Path of God: Islam and Political Power. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
  35. Rorty, Richard. 1978. Contingency, Solidarity, Irony. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  36. Said, Edward. 1997. Covering Islam: How the Media and the Experts Determine How We See the Rest of the World. London: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
  37. Sayyid, Salman. 2003. A Fundamental Fear, Eurocentrism and the Emergence of Islamism. London/New York: Zed Books.Google Scholar
  38. Scruton, Roger. 2002. The West and the Rest: Globalization and the Terrorist Threat. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
  39. Sivan, Emmanuel. 1990. Radical Islam: Medieval Theology and Modern Politics. New Haven/London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  40. Tibi, Bassam. 2005. Islam Between Culture and Politics. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. ———. 2008. Political Islam, World Politics, and Europe. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. ———. 2012. Islamism and Islam. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  43. Turner, Bryan. 1989. From Orientalism to Global Sociology. Sociology 23 (3): 629–638.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Voll, John Obert. 1994. Islam as a Special World-System. Journal of World History 5 (2): 213–226.Google Scholar
  45. Volpi, Frederic. 2010. Political Islam Observed. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  46. Wiktorowicz, Quintan. 2006. A Genealogy of Radical Islam. Studies in Conflict and Terrorism 28 (2): 75–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Zubaida, Sami. 1993. Islam, People and the State. London/New York: I.B. Tauris & Co Ltd.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of South AustraliaAdelaideAustralia

Personalised recommendations