Advertisement

Refuting the Extremist Interpretations of the Text and the Prophetic Traditions: The Case of Qur’an 2:256

  • Hakan Coruh
Chapter
Part of the Middle East Today book series (MIET)

Abstract

This chapter takes Q. 2:256 as a case study to show how radicalised groups such as Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS) understand it, refuting this narrative by relying on mainstream understandings of war and peace-related scriptural texts. While Q. 2:256 states “there is no compulsion in religion,” proponents of offensive jihad claim this verse was abrogated by the sword verse (Q. 9:5). Some classical jurists were influenced by a war-based relationship in the medieval period. Therefore, some verses from the last stage of the Qur’anic revelation, such as Q. 9:5, are interpreted in such a way that fighting against unbelievers will be a continuing norm and other verses, such as Q. 2:256, are interpreted accordingly. Q. 2:256 declares a final universal principle about the freedom of religion and unconditionally fighting due to faith is not a mainstream Islamic approach.

References

  1. Abdel Haleem, M. 2018. The Role of Context in Interpreting and Translating the Qur’an. Journal of Qur’anic Studies 20 (1): 47–66.Google Scholar
  2. Abū Sulaymān, Abdul Hamid. 1987. Towards an Islamic Theory of International Relations: New Directions for Methodology and Thought. Herndon: International Institute of Islamic Thought.Google Scholar
  3. Adang, Camilla, Hassan Ansari, Maribel Fierro, and Sabine Schmidtke, eds. 2015. Accusations of Unbelief in Islam: A Diachronic Perspective on Takfīr. Leiden/Boston: Brill.Google Scholar
  4. Afsaruddin, Asma. 2013. Striving in the Path of God: Jihad and Martyrdom in Islamic Thought. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Al-Bukhhārī, Muhammad ibn Ismā‘īl. 1998. Ṣaḥīḥ al-Bukhārī, ed. Abū Ṣuhayb al-Karmī. Riyadh: Bayt al-Afkār al-Dawliyyah.Google Scholar
  6. Al-Dawoody, Ahmed. 2011. The Islamic Law of War Justifications and Regulations. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. al-Jawziyyah, Ibn Qayyim. 1983. Aḥkām ahl al-dhimmah, ed. Subhi al-Salih, 3rd ed. Beirut: Dar al-‘Ilm li’l-alamin.Google Scholar
  8. Al-Qaradawi, Yusuf. 2009. Fiqh al-Jihad. 3rd ed. Qairo: Maktabah Wahba.Google Scholar
  9. al-Rāzī, Fakhr al-Dīn. 2018. Mafāt īḥ al-ghayb. Jordan: The Prince Ghazi Trust for Qur’anic Thought. http://www.greattafsirs.com/Tafsir_Library.aspx?SoraNo=2&AyahNo=256&MadhabNo=1&TafsirNo=4. Accessed 22 May 2018.
  10. al-Sarakhsī, Shamseddin. 1997. Sharḥ al-Kitab Al-Siyar Al-kabîr. Dar Al-Kutub al-‘Ilmiyya.Google Scholar
  11. Al-Sijistānī, Abū Dâvûd. n.d. Sunan Abi Dawud. https://sunnah.com/abudawud/15/206. Accessed 21 May 2018.
  12. Al-Tabari, Abu Ja‘far. 2018. Jami‘ al-Bayān fī Tafsīr al-Qur’an. Jordan: Royal Aal al-Bayt Institute for Islamic Thought. http://www.altafsir.com/Tafasir.asp?tMadhNo=0&tTafsirNo=1&tSoraNo=2&tAyahNo=256&tDisplay=yes&Page=1&Size=1&LanguageId=1. Accessed 9 Apr 2018.Google Scholar
  13. Bonney, Richard. 2004. Jihād: From Qurʼān to Bin Laden. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  14. Bunzel, Cole. 2015. From Paper State to Caliphate: The Ideology of the Islamic State. Washington, DC: Brookings Center for Middle East Policy.Google Scholar
  15. Dagli, Caner K. 2015. Conquest and Conversion, War and Peace in the Qur’an. In The Study Quran: A New Translation and Commentary, ed. Seyyed Hossein Nasr, 1805–1808. New York: HarperOne.Google Scholar
  16. Diyanet İşleri Başkanlığı. 2007. Kur’an Yolu Turkce Meal ve Tefsir [The Path of the Qur’an: Turkish Translation and Commentary]. Ankara: DIB Yayin.Google Scholar
  17. Hasan, Ahmad. 1965. The Theory of Naskh. Islamic Studies 4 (2): 181–200.Google Scholar
  18. Hassan, Hassan. 2016. The Sectarianism of the Islamic State: Ideological Roots and Political Context. Washington, DC: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.Google Scholar
  19. Hayward, Joel. 2013. Warfare in the Qur’an. In War and Peace in Islam, ed. Ghazi bin Muhammad, Ibrahim Kalin, and Mohammad Hashim Kamali, 28–55. Cambridge: MABDA.Google Scholar
  20. Ibn ʿAbidīn. 2003. Radd al-Mukhtar, ed. Âdil Ahmad Abdulmawjûd and Ali Muhammad Muawwiz. Riyadh: Dar Alam al-Kutub.Google Scholar
  21. Ibn Kathir, Ab al-Feda. 2000. Tafsīr Al-Qur’ān Al-‘Azīm. Cairo: Maktabat Avlad Al Shaykh Let-Turāth and Muassasat Qurtuba.Google Scholar
  22. Kalin, Ibrahim. 2013. Islam and Peace: A Survey of the Sources of Peace in the Islamic Tradition. In War and Peace in Islam, ed. Ghazi bin Muhammad, Ibrahim Kalin and Mohammad Hashim Kamali, 217–249. Cambridge: MABDA.Google Scholar
  23. Kamali, Mohammad Hashim. 2003. Principles of Islamic Jurisprudence. Cambridge, UK: Islamic Texts Society.Google Scholar
  24. ———. 2013. Introduction to War and Peace in Islam, ed. Ghazi bin Muhammad, Ibrahim Kalin and Mohammad Hashim Kamali, xi–xvii. Cambridge: MABDA.Google Scholar
  25. Khalil, Mohammad Hassan. 2017. Jihad, Radicalism, and the New Atheism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. McAuliffe, Jane Dammen. 2007. Qur’ānic Christians: An Analysis of Classical and Modern Exegesis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  27. McCants, William. 2015. The ISIS Apocalypse: The History, Strategy, and Doomsday Vision of the Islamic State. New York: St. Martin’s Press.Google Scholar
  28. Muslim. n.d. Sahih al-Muslim. https://sunnah.com/nawawi40/14. Accessed 10 Apr 2018.
  29. Nanninga, Pieter. 2018. ‘Among the Believers Are Men’: How the Islamic State Uses Early-Islamic Traditions to Shape Its Martyr Biographies. Numen 65 (2–3): 165–184.Google Scholar
  30. Nasai. n.d. Sunan an-Nasa’i. Book 45, Hadith 38. https://sunnah.com/nasai/45/38. Accessed 10 Apr 2018.
  31. Nasr, Seyyed Hossein. 2015. The Study Quran: A New Translation and Commentary. New York: HarperOne.Google Scholar
  32. Nyazee, Imran Ahsan. 2006. Islamic Jurisprudence (Uṣūl al-Fiqh). New Delhi: Adam Publishers & Distributors.Google Scholar
  33. Özel, Ahmet. 1993. Cihad. In Diyanet Islam Ansiklopedisi (Turkish Diyanet’s Encyclopedia of Islam), ed. TDV İslâm Araştırmaları Merkezi, 527–531. Istanbul: Diyanet Vakfı.Google Scholar
  34. Rahman, Fazlur. 2009. Major Themes of the Qur’an. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  35. Roy, Olivier. 2017. Who Are the New Jihadis?. The Guardian, April 13. https://www.theguardian.com/news/2017/apr/13/who-are-the-new-jihadis. Accessed 9 Apr 2018.
  36. Saeed, Abdullah. 2006. Interpreting the Qurʼān Towards a Contemporary Approach. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  37. ———. 2013. The Case for Religious Liberty: Re-reading the Qur’an. ABC Religion and Ethics, August 19. http://www.abc.net.au/religion/articles/2013/08/19/3828984.htm. Accessed 9 Apr 2018.
  38. Tahiri, Hussein, and Michele Grossman. 2013. Community and Radicalisation: An Examination of Perceptions, Ideas, Beliefs and Solutions Throughout Australia. Melbourne: Victoria Police and Victoria University.Google Scholar
  39. von Denffer, Ahmad. 1994. ʿUlūm al Qurʾān. Leicester: Islamic Foundation.Google Scholar
  40. Wagemakers, Joas. 2016. Salafism. Oxford Research Encyclopedias. USA: Religion Oxford University Press. https://www.academia.edu/27786496/Salafism_2016_. Accessed 9 Apr 2018.
  41. Wasserstein, David J. 2017. Black Banners of ISIS the Roots of the New Caliphate. Yale: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  42. Zamakhshari. 2018. Al-Kashshaf an Haqaiq al-Tanzil. Jordan: The Prince Ghazi Trust for Qur’anic Thought. http://www.greattafsirs.com/Tafsir_Library.aspx?SoraNo=2&AyahNo=256&MadhabNo=1&TafsirNo=2. Accessed 22 May 2018.

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Charles Sturt UniversitySydneyAustralia

Personalised recommendations