Advertisement

Interpretivism—Valuing the Unfolding Lives and Stories of Young Families

  • Alice BrownEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Palgrave Studies in Education Research Methods book series (PSERM)

Abstract

Storytelling and oral history is embedded in, and a notable part of, the practices and culture of many tribes, and families across generations, and through time. Stories serve a range of purposes, including passing on practices, history, values, and the meanings and interpretations of life events. Valuing the storied lives of young families opens up new research spaces, where the focus becomes one of gaining insights into how families make sense of their social worlds whilst also giving voice and honouring the personal experiences, practices, and environments of others. When families are offered the opportunity to recount and provide narratives about their domestic lives, they draw from an interpretive frame that reflects their understandings of their contexts and the contexts of others in their social world. This chapter focusses more specifically on the value of interpretivism as a lens for seeking to understand young families.

References

  1. Alasuutari, M. (2013). Voicing the child? A case study in Finnish early childhood education. Childhood, 21(2), 1–8.Google Scholar
  2. Alderson, P., & Morrow, V. (2011). The ethics of research with children and young people: A practical handbook. London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Berg, B. (2016). Qualitative research methods for the social sciences (9th ed.). Boston: Pearson.Google Scholar
  4. Bermúdez, J. M., Muruthi, B., & Jordan, L. (2016). Decolonizing research methods for family science: Creating space at the centre – Decolonizing research practices. Journal of Family Theory & Review, 8(2), 192–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bessarab, D., & Ng’andu, B. (2010). Yarning about yarning as a legitimate method in indigenous research. Journal of Critical Indigenous Studies, 3(1), 37–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bronfenbrenner, U., & Morris, P. (2006). The bioecological model of human development. In W. Damon & R. M. Lerner (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology, volume 1, theoretical models of human development (6th ed., pp. 793–828). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  7. Brown, A. (2009). South Burnett early movement and stimulation project. Retrieved from Toowoomba, QLD. https://eprints.usq.edu.au/7703/1/Brown_Project_Report_2009_AV.pdf
  8. Brown, A. (2012). The new frontier: A social ecological exploration of factors impacting on parental support for the active play of young children within the micro-environment of the family home. PhD, University of Southern Queensland, Toowoomba, QLD.Google Scholar
  9. Brown, A., & Danaher, P. A. (2012, December 2–6). Respectful, responsible and reciprocal ruralities research: Approaching and positioning educational research differently within Australian rural communities. Paper presented at the Joint International Conference of the Australian Association for Research in Education and the Asia Pacific Educational Research Association (AARE 2012): Regional and Global Cooperation in Educational Research, Sydney, NSW.Google Scholar
  10. Brown, A., & Danaher, P. A. (2017). CHE Principles: Facilitating authentic and dialogical semi-structured interviews in educational research. International Journal of Research & Method in Education, 1–15.  https://doi.org/10.1080/1743727X.2017.13799.
  11. Bruner, J. (1986). Actual minds, possible worlds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Bruner, J. (1996). The culture of education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Bryman, A. (2015). Social research methods. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Bushin, N. (2009). Researching family migration decision making: A children-in-families approach. Population, Space and Place, 15(5), 429–443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Christensen, P., & James, A. (Eds.). (2008). Research with children: Perspectives and practices (2nd ed.). Milton Park, Oxon: Falmer Press.Google Scholar
  16. Clandinin, J. (2007). Handbook of narrative inquiry: Mapping a methodology. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Clark, A. (2001). How to listen to very young children: The Mosaic approach. Child Care in Practice, 7(4), 333–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Clark, A. (2011). Breaking methodological boundaries? Exploring visual, participatory methods with adults and young children. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 19(3), 321–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Clark, A., Kjorholt, A. T., & Moss, P. (2005). Beyond listening: Children’s perspectives on early childhood services. Bristol, UK, Policy Press.Google Scholar
  20. Clark, A., & Moss, P. (2005). Spaces to play: More listening to young children using the Mosaic approach. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.Google Scholar
  21. Clark, A., & Moss, P. (2011). Listening to young children: The Mosaic approach (2nd ed.). London: National Children’s Bureau and Joseph Rowntree Foundation.Google Scholar
  22. Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2007). Research methods in education. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Connelly, M., & Clandinin, D. (1990). Stories of experience and narrative inquiry. Educational Researcher, 19(5), 2–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Covey, S. (1989). He seven habits of highly effective people: Powerful lessons in person change. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  25. Creswell, J. (2013). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  26. Daiute, C., & Lightfoot, C. (2004). Theory and craft in narrative inquiry. In C. Daiute & C. Lightfoot (Eds.), Narrative analysis: Studying the development of individuals in society (pp. vii–xviii). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Daly, K. J. (2007). Qualitative methods for family studies and human development. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  28. Denzin, N., & Lincoln, N. (2008). The landscape of qualitative research: Theories and issues (3rd ed.). London: Sage.Google Scholar
  29. Denzin, N., & Lincoln, N. (Eds.). (2011). The Sage handbook of qualitative research (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  30. Denzin, N., & Lincoln, N. (2017). The Sage handbook of qualitative research (5th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  31. Dickson-Swift, V., James, E., Kippen, S., & Liamputtong, P. (2007). Doing sensitive research: What challenges do qualitative researchers face? Qualitative Research, 7(3), 327–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Dockett, S., & Perry, B. (2011). Researching with young children: Seeking assent. Child Indicators Research, 4(2), 231–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Dreher, T. (2012). A partial promise of voice: Digital Storytelling and the limits of listening. Media International Australia Incorporating Culture and Policy: Quarterly journal of media research and resources, 42, 157–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Edwards, C., Gandini, L., & Forman, G. (1998). The hundred languages of children: The Reggio Emilia approach advanced reflections (2nd ed.). Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing.Google Scholar
  35. England, K. (1994). Getting personal: Reflexivity, positionality, and feminist research. The Professional Geographer, 46(1), 80–89.Google Scholar
  36. Fargas-Malet, M., McSherry, D., Larkin, E., & Robinson, C. (2010). Research with children: Methodological issues and innovative techniques. Journal of Early Childhood Research, 8(2), 175–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Farrelly, T., Stewart-Withers, R., & Kelly Dombrowski, K. (2014). Being there: Mothering and absence/presence in the field. Sites: A Journal of Social Anthropology and Cultural Studies, 11(2), 1–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Fedesco, H. N. (2015). The impact of (In)effective listening on interpersonal interactions. The International Journal of Listening, 29(2), 103–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Fenton, A., Walsh, K., Wong, S., & Cumming, T. (2015). Using strengths-based approaches in early years practice and research. International Journal of Early Childhood, 47(1), 27–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Fiese, B. (2013). Family context in early childhood. In O. Saracho & B. Spodek (Eds.), Handbook of research on the education of young children (3rd ed., pp. 369–384). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  41. Fiese, B., & Wamboldt, F. S. (2003). Coherent accounts of coping with a chronic illness: Convergences and divergences in family measurement using a narrative analysis. Family Process, 42(4), 439–451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Geia, L. K., Hayes, B., & Usher, K. (2013). Yarning/Aboriginal storytelling: Towards an understanding of an Indigenous perspective and its implications for research practice. Contemporary Nurse, 46(1), 13–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Gergen, K. J. (2009). Relational being: Beyond self and community. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  44. Grace, R., Hodge, K., & McMahon, C. (Eds.). (2017). Children, families and communities (5th ed.). South Melbourne, VIC: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  45. Gray, C., & Winter, E. (2011). Hearing voices: Participatory research with preschool children with and without disabilities. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 19(3), 309–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Grbich, C. (2007). Qualitative data analysis: An Introduction. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  47. Gubrium, J., & Holstein, J. (2003). Analysing interpretive practice. In N. Denzin & N. Lincoln (Eds.), Strategies of qualitative inquiry (2nd ed., pp. 214–248). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  48. Gubrium, J., Holstein, J., Marvasti, A., & McKinney, K. (2012). The Sage handbook of interview research: The complexity of craft. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Hampton, R., & Toombs, M. (2013). Culture, identity and indigenous Australian people. In R. Hampton & M. Toombs (Eds.), Indigenous Australians and health: The wombat in the room (pp. 3–23). South Melbourne, VIC: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  50. Hancox, D. (2011). Stories with impact: The potential of storytelling to contribute to cultural research and social inclusion. The Journal of Media and Culture, 14(6). http://journal.media-culture.org.au/index.php/mcjournal/article/view/439
  51. Harcourt, D., & Einarsdóttir, J. (2011). Introducing children’s perspectives and participation in research. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 19(3), 301–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Harcourt, D., Perry, B., & Waller, T. (2011). Researching young children’s perspectives: Debating the ethics and dilemmas of educational research with children. London: Taylor & Francis.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Harden, J., Backett-Milburn, K., Hill, M., & MacLean, A. (2010). Oh, what a tangled web we weave: Experiences of doing ‘multiple perspectives’ research in families. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 13(5), 441–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Hawkins, K. (2010). A cry to teach for social justice: Linking early childhood education, participatory action research and children’s literature. Toowoomba, QLD: University of Southern Queensland.Google Scholar
  55. Hodge, F. S., Pasqua, A., Marquez, C. A., & Geishirt-Cantrell, B. (2002). Utilizing traditional storytelling to promote wellness in American Indian communities. Journal of Transcultural Nursing, 13(1), 6–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. James, A., & Prout, A. (Eds.). (1997). Constructing and reconstructing childhood. London: Falmer.Google Scholar
  57. James, A., & Prout, A. (2015). Constructing and reconstructing childhood: Contemporary issues in the sociological study of childhood. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Kansteiner, K. (2002). Finding meaning in memory: A methodological critique of collective memory studies. History & Theory, 41(2), 179–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Kellett, M. (2010). Rethinking children and research: Attitudes in contemporary society. London: Continuum International Publishing.Google Scholar
  60. Kiser, L. J. (2015). Strengthening family coping resources: Intervention for families impacted by trauma. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Kiser, L. J., Baumgardner, B., & Dorado, J. (2010). Who are we, but for the stories we tell: Family stories and healing. Psychological Trauma: Theory, Research, Practice, and Policy, 2(3), 243–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Kovach, M. (2009). Indigenous methodologies: Characteristics, conversations, and contexts. Toronto, ON: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
  63. Kovacha, M. (2010). Conversational method in indigenous research. First Peoples Child and Family Review, 5(1), 40–48.Google Scholar
  64. Lansdown, G. (2005). Can you hear me? The right of young children to participate in decisions affecting them (Working papers in early childhood development, no. 36). ERIC.Google Scholar
  65. Levy, D., Murphy, L., & Lee, C. K. (2008). Influences and emotions: Exploring family decision-making processes when buying a house. Housing Studies, 23(2), 271–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Lincoln, Y., & Guba, E. (1988). Criteria for assessing naturalistic inquiries as reports. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association, April 5–9, New Orleans, LA.Google Scholar
  67. Lohoar, S., Butera, N., & Kennedy, E. (2014). Strengths of Australian Aboriginal cultural practices in family life and child rearing. Retrieved from https://aifs.gov.au/cfca/sites/default/files/publication-documents/cfca25.pdf
  68. Lunn, J., & Moscuazz, A. (2014). Doing it together: Ethical dimensions of accompanied fieldwork In J. Lunn (Ed.), Fieldwork in the global south: Ethical challenges and dilemmas (pp. 69–82). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  69. Macnamara, J. (2015). Creating an ‘architecture of listening’ in organizations: The basis of engagement, trust, healthy democracy, social equity, and business sustainability. Retrieved from Sydney, NSW. https://www.uts.edu.au/sites/default/files/fass-organizational-listening-report.pdf
  70. MacNaughton, G. (2005). Doing Foucault in early childhood studies: Applying post-structural ideas. New York: RoutledgeFalmer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Malaguzzi, L. (1993). History, ideas, and basic philosophy: An interview with Lella Gandini. In C. Edwards, L. Gandini, & G. Forman (Eds.), The hundred languages of children: The Reggio Emilia approach – Advanced reflections (2nd ed.). Greenwich, CT: Ablex Publishing.Google Scholar
  72. Mannion, G. (2007). Going spatial, going relational: Why “listening to children” and children’s participation needs reframing. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 28(3), 405–420.Google Scholar
  73. McCashen, W. (2005). The strengths approach. Bendigo, VIC: St. Luke’s Innovative Resources.Google Scholar
  74. McHale, S., Booth, A., & Amato, P. (Eds.). (2014). Emerging methods in family research. London: Springer.Google Scholar
  75. McKendrick, J. H. (2001). Coming of age: Rethinking the role of children in population studies. International Journal of Population Geography, 7(6), 461–472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. McTavish, M., Streelasky, J., & Coles, L. (2012). Listening to children’s voices: Children as participants in research. International Journal of Early Childhood, 44(3), 249–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Merriam, S., & Tisdall, E. (2016). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation (4th ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  78. Miles, M., Chapman, Y., & Francis, K. (2015). Peeling the onion: Understanding others’ lived experience. Contemporary Nurse, 50(2–3), 286–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Morrow, V. (2011). Understanding children and childhood (Centre for Children and Young People background briefing series, no. 1). Retrieved from Lismore: https://studylib.net/doc/8773920/understanding-children-and-childhood
  80. Morrow, V., & Richards, M. (1996). The ethics of social research with children: An overview. Children and Society, 10(2), 90–105.Google Scholar
  81. Moss, P., & Petre, P. (2005). From children’s services to children’s spaces: Public policy, children and childhood. New York: Routledge Falmer.Google Scholar
  82. Moss, P., & Petrie, P. (2002). From children’s services to children’s spaces. London: Routledge Falmer.Google Scholar
  83. Palaiologou, I. (2014). ‘Do we hear what children want to say?’ Ethical praxis when choosing research tools with children under five. Early Child Development and Care, 184(5), 689–705.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Paris, D. (2011). ‘A friend who understand fully’: Notes on humanizing research in a multiethnic youth community. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 24(2), 137–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Paris, D., & Winn, M. (Eds.). (2014). Humanizing research: Decolonizing qualitative inquiry with youth and communities. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  86. Pascal, C., & Bertram, T. (2009). Listening to young citizens: The struggle to make real a participatory paradigm in research with young children. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 17(2), 249–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Perrino, S. (2011). Chronotopes of story and storytelling event in interviews. Language in Society, 40(1), 91–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Podesta, J. (2013). Listening to children’s voices: Child-centred participatory research tools for sociologists. Retrieved from https://www.tasa.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2013/11/Podesta.pdf
  89. Pole, C., Mizen, P., & Bolton, A. (1999). Realising children’s agency in research: Partners and participants? International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 2(1), 39–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Pring, R. (2000). Philosophy of educational research. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
  91. Prout, A. (2000). Children’s participation: control and self-realisation in British late modernity. Children and Society, 14(4), 304–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Rinaldi, C. (2006). In dialogue with Reggio Emilia: Listening, researching, and learning. London: Routledge Falmer.Google Scholar
  93. Rinaldi, C. (2013). Carla Rinaldi: Re-imagining childhood. Adelaide thinker in residence series. Retrieved from http://www.decd.sa.gov.au/aboutdept/files/links/reimagining_childhood.pdf
  94. Saleebey, D. (2012). The strengths perspective in social work practice (6th ed.). Boston: Pearson.Google Scholar
  95. Sandri, R. A. (2013). Weaving the past into the present: Indigenous stories of education across generations. Doctor of Philosophy PhD, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD.Google Scholar
  96. Schoemperlen, D. (2000). Our lady of the lost and found. New York: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  97. Stake, R. (1995). The art of case study research. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  98. Stake, R. (2010). Qualitative research: Studying how things work. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  99. Stark, S., & Torrance, H. (2005). Case study. In B. Somekh & C. Lewin (Eds.), Research methods in the social sciences (pp. 33–40). London: Sage.Google Scholar
  100. Stokols, D. (1987). Conceptual strategies of environmental psychology. In D. Stokols & I. Altman (Eds.), Handbook of environmental psychology (pp. 41–70). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  101. Sumsion, J., & Goodfellow, J. (2012). ‘Looking and listening-in’: A methodological approach to generating insights into infants’ experiences of early childhood education and care settings. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 20(3), 313–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Thomas, R. (2014). Honouring the oral traditions of my ancestors through storytelling. In S. Strega & L. Brown (Eds.), Research as resistance: Revisiting critical, indigenous and anti-oppressive approaches to research (2nd ed., pp. 177–198). Toronto, ON: Canadian Scholars Press.Google Scholar
  103. United Nations. (1989). Convention on the rights of the child. Retrieved from New York. https://www.ohchr.org/Documents/ProfessionalInterest/crc.pdf
  104. Van Manen, M. (1990). Researching lived experience: Human science for an action sensitive pedagogy. New York: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  105. Walter, M. (Ed.). (2013). Social research methods (3rd ed.). Melbourne, VIC: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  106. Warr, D. (2004). Stories in the flesh and voices in the head: Reflections on the context and impact of research with disadvantaged populations. Qualitative Health Research, 14(4), 578–587.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. Williams, D., & Fraga, L. (2011). Coming together around military families. In D. Osofsky (Ed.), Clinical work with traumatized young children (pp. 172–197). New York: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  108. Wong, S. M., & Cumming, T. (2008). Practice grounded in theory: The theoretical and philosophical underpinnings of SDN’s Child, Family and Children’s Services Programs. The second of eight reports investigating SDN’s Child, Family and Children’s Services Program. Retrieved from Sydney, NSW. http://www.academia.edu/836851/Practice_Grounded_in_Theory
  109. Woodhead, M. (2006). Changing perspectives on early childhood: Theory, research and policy: A background paper the Education for All Global Monitoring Report 2007: Strong foundations: Early childhood care and education – Changing perspectives. Retrieved from http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0014/001474/147499e.pdf
  110. Woodhead, M., & Faulkner, D. (2008). Subjects, objects or participants? Dilemmas on psychological research with children. In P. Christensen & A. James (Eds.), Research with children: Perspectives and practices (2nd ed., pp. 10–39). Milton Park, Oxon: Falmer Press.Google Scholar
  111. Yunkaporta, T., & Kirby, M. (2011). Yarning up Aboriginal pedagogies: A dialogue about eight Aboriginal ways of learning. In N. Purdie, G. Milgate, & H. R. Bell (Eds.), Two way teaching and learning: Toward culturally reflective and relevant education (pp. 205–213). Camberwell, VIC: ACER Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Business, Education, Law and ArtsUniversity of Southern QueenslandSpringfield CentralAustralia

Personalised recommendations