Advertisement

Understanding the Open Sharing Learning Environment Online and Local Starts

  • Shalin Hai-Jew
Chapter

Abstract

Those interested in possibly contributing open-shared digital learning contents would do well to acquire a sense of the sharing ecosystem and of their distinct possible roles in that space. This chapter introduces the topic of open-shared learning online as a phenomenon with roots going back several decades. This chapter takes the learner through an environmental scan of the open-shared learning space and some methods to identify what the reader may contribute to this space—by evaluating his/her/their organizational context, skill set, interest in contributing, and other related factors.

Keywords

Environmental scan Internal organizational scan Subject domain Open sharing Online learning resource ecosystem Open sharing Learning object Learning sequence Learning resource 

Notes

Key Terms and Definitions

Altruism

A self-less care for others

Authorizing document

An official document that authorizes particular work to be done, such as for an instructional design project

B Corp

Corporations that make commitments to enable prosocial and pro-environmental impacts

Crowd-Source

The act of going to people who are active in online communities and spaces to acquire information, resources, work, and other goods

Electronic textbook

An electronic textbook, often created with multimodal features

Environmental scan

A fast exploration of a particular context, often to understand opportunities and threats

Granularity

The size of an item, ranging from fine to coarse granularity

Internal scan

An evaluation of an in-organization environment to understand particular features

Non-rivalrous

The feature of an object (such as a digital learning one) being able to be used by large numbers of people without being diminished or materially limited

Open access

Able to be accessed/experienced/read without cost or other common barriers

Open educational resources (OER)

Openly available learning contents, often released to extended use through licensure

Open shared

Resources made available to the broad public often via the web and internet and through generous licensure releases and often with the fewest barriers as possible (no or low paywalls, no or few proprietary technologies required, no membership requirements, and so on)

Open source

A software program with its underlying code publicly available

Personal best

The optimal achievement for any individual, which is often higher than the individual may assume

Reusability

The ability to use an object or sequence in a different context

Sharing creator’s remorse

A sense of regret for expending time, talent, and treasure in creating open-shared learning resources publicly and for free

Topic-based sampler

A collection of open-shared and proprietary online learning objects based on a particular subject matter

Transclusion

Act of including part of an electronic document via hypertext

References

  1. Atenas J, Havemann L, and Priego E. Opening teaching landscapes: The importance of quality assurance in the delivery of open educational resources. Open Praxis 6: 29 – 43, 2014.Google Scholar
  2. Batson T, Paharia N, and Kumar MSV. A harvest too large? A framework for educational abundance. Ch. 6. In T. Iiyoshi and M.S. Vijay Kumar’s Opening Up Education: The Collective Advancement of Education through Open Technology, Open Content, and Open Knowledge. Cambridge: The MIT Press. 89 – 103, 2008.Google Scholar
  3. Butcher N. A Basic Guide to Open Educational Resources (OER). Commonwealth of Learning. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. 2011.Google Scholar
  4. Certified B Corporation. http://www.bcorporation.net/. 2018.
  5. Collins J. Good to Great: Why Some Companies Make the Leap…and Others Don’t. New York: HarperCollins Publishers. 2001.Google Scholar
  6. Conole G, McAndrew P, and Dimitriadis Y. The role of CSCL pedagogical patterns as mediating artefacts for repurposing Open Educational Resources. In: Pozzi F. and Persico D., Eds. Techniques for Fostering Collaboration in Online Learning Communities: Theoretical and Practical Perspectives. Hershey, USA: IGI Global. http://oro.open.ac.uk/23040/. 2011.
  7. De Vries I. 2013. Evaluating open educational resources: Lessons learned. Soc Behav Sciences 83: 56 – 60, 2013;  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.06.012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dinevski D. Open educational resources and lifelong learning. In the proceedings of the ITI 2008 30th International Conf on Information Technology Interfaces. June 23 – 26, 2008. Cavtat, Croatia. 117 – 122, 2008.Google Scholar
  9. Downes S. Models for sustainable open educational resources. Interdisciplinary Journal of Knowledge and Learning Objects 3: 29 – 44, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Fitzgerald B. Open Content Licensing (OCL) for open educational resources. In the proceedings of OECD Expert Meeting on Open Educational Resources, Malmö, Sweden. Retrieved May 10, 2018, from http://eprints.qut.edu.au/archive/00003621. 1 – 24, 2005.
  11. Fulantelli G, Gentile M, Taibi D, and Allegra M. The Open Learning Object model to promote open educational resources. Journal of Interactive Media in Education. 1 – 24, 2008.  https://doi.org/10.5334/2008-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Geser G. Open educational practices and resources: OLCOS roadmap 2012. Open eLearning Content Observatory Services. 1 – 150, 2012.Google Scholar
  13. Geith C, and Vignare K. Access to education with online learning and open educational resources: Can they close the gap? Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks 12: 105 – 126, 2008. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ837472.
  14. Harley D. Why understanding the use and users of open education matters. Chapter 13. In T. Iiyoshi and M.S. V. Kumar’s Opening Up Education: The Collective Advancement of Education through Open Technology, Open Content, and Open Knowledge. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching and The MIT Press. 197 – 211, 2008.Google Scholar
  15. Hockings C, Brett P, and Terentjevs M. Making a difference—Inclusive learning and teaching in higher education through open educational resources. Distance Education 33: 237 – 252, 2012. DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2012.692066.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hsu JS, Liang TP, Wu SPJ, Klein G, and Jiang JJ. Promoting the integration of users and developers to achieve a collective mind through the screening of information system projects. International Journal of Project Management 29: 514 – 524, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kanwar A, Kodhandaraman B, and Umar A. Toward sustainable open education resources: A perspective from the Global South. The Amer. Jrn. of Distance Education 24: 65 – 80, 2010.  https://doi.org/10.1080/08923641003696588.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kerr DV, Burgess K, and Houghton L. Feral Information Systems Development: Managerial Implications. Hershey: IGI Global. 2014.Google Scholar
  19. Klebl M, Krämer BJ, and Zobel A. From content to practice: Sharing educational practice in edu-sharing. British Journal of Educational Technology 41: 936 – 951, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Koohang A, and Harman K. Advancing sustainability of open educational resources. Issues in Informing Science and Information Technology 4: 535 – 544, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lane A. Reflections on sustaining Open Educational Resources: an institutional case study. eLearning Papers 10: 1 – 13, 2008.Google Scholar
  22. Lane A, and McAndrew P. Are open educational resources systematic or systemic change agents for teaching practice? British Journal of Educational Technology 41: 952 – 962, 2010.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2010.01119.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. McKerlich R, Ives C, and McGreal R. Measuring use and creation of open educational resources in higher education. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning 14: 90 – 103, 2013. Google Scholar
  24. Nichols T. The Death of Expertise: The Campaign against Established Knowledge and Why it Matters. New York: Oxford University Press. 2017.Google Scholar
  25. Ochoa X. Learnometrics: Metrics for Learning Objects. Slideshow. Retrieved May 18, 2018, from https://www.slideshare.net/xaoch/learnometrics-metrics-for-learning-objects-presentation. 2008.
  26. Ochoa X. Learnometrics: Metrics for Learning (Objects). In the proceedings of LAK 2011. Retrieved from https://www.slideshare.net/xaoch/learnometrics-keynote-lak2011. 2011.
  27. Ochoa X, and Duval E. Measuring learning object reuse. Times of Convergence. Technologies across Learning Contexts. Third European Conference on Technology Enhanced Learning. Maastricht, The Netherlands. 322 – 325, 2008.Google Scholar
  28. OER World Map. n.d. https://oerworldmap.org/.
  29. Phelan L. REFLECTION: Politics, practices, and possibilities of open educational resources. Distance Education 33: 279 – 282, 2012.  https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2012.692070.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Raymond ES. The Cathedral and the Bazaar. Thyrsus Enterprises. Archived copy on Internet Archives Wayback Machine. Retrieved May 20, 2018, from https://web.archive.org/web/20030424100429/http://www.catb.org/~esr/writings/cathedral-bazaar/cathedral-bazaar/. 2000.
  31. Richter T, and McPherson M. Open educational resources: Education for the world? Distance Education 33: 201 – 219, 2012.  https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2012.692068.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Rodriguez CO. MOOCs and the AI-Stanford like courses: Two successful and distinct course formats for Massive Open Online Courses. European Journal of Open, Distance and E-Learning. 1 – 13, 2013.Google Scholar
  33. Scanlon E. Scholarship in the digital age: Open educational resources, publication and public engagement. British Journal of Educational Technology 45: 12 – 23, 2014.  https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Sclater N. The organizational impact of open educational resources. In: Ehlers, Ulf-Daniel and Schneckenberg, Dirk, Eds. Changing Cultures in Higher Education: Moving Ahead to Future Learning. Berlin: Springer. http://oro.open.ac.uk/18765/. The Open University. 2009.Google Scholar
  35. Shapiro JP, and Stefkovich JA. Ethical Leadership and Decision Making in Education: Applying Theoretical Perspectives to Complex Dilemmas. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers. 2001.Google Scholar
  36. Shirky C. Here Comes Everybody: The Power of Organizing without Organizations. New York: Penguin Press. 2008.Google Scholar
  37. Smith MS, and Casserly CM. The promise of open educational resources. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning 38: 8 – 17, 2006.  https://doi.org/10.3200/CHNG.38.5.8-17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Straumsheim C. Where open textbooks are used. Inside Higher Ed. Retrieved May 19, 2018, from https://www.insidehighered.com/news/2016/07/26/study-finds-use-open-educational-resources-rise-introductory-courses. 2016.
  39. Tuomi I. Open educational resources and the transformation of education. European Journal of Education 48: 1 – 20, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Wenk B. Open educational resources (OER) inspire teaching and learning. IEEE EDUCON Education Engineering 2010- The future of Global Learning Engineering Education. Madrid, Spain. 435 – 441, 2010.Google Scholar
  41. Wiley D. On the sustainability of open educational resource initiatives in higher education. OECD Centre for Educational Research and Innovation (CERI). Paper. 2007.Google Scholar
  42. Wiley D. Openness as catalyst for an educational reformation. EDUCAUSE Review 45:14 – 20, 2010. https://er.educause.edu/articles/2010/8/openness-as-catalyst-for-an-educational-reformation.
  43. Willems J, and Bossu C. Equity considerations for open educational resources in the glocalization of education. Distance Education 33: 1 – 16, 2012.  https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2012.692051.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Yuan L, MacNeill S, and Kraan W. Open educational resources—opportunities and challenges for higher education. Educational Cybernetics: Reports. Paper 1. 2008.Google Scholar

Additional Reading Section

  1. Benkler Y. The Wealth of Networks: How Social Production Transforms Markets and Freedom. New Haven: Yale University Press. 2006.Google Scholar
  2. Merriam SB, and Caffarella RS. Learning in Adulthood: A Comprehensive Guide. 2nd Ed. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers. 1999.Google Scholar
  3. Steers RM, Porter LW, and Bigley GA. Motivation and Leadership at Work. 6th Ed. Boston: McGraw Hill. 1996.Google Scholar
  4. Walters K, and Brody M. What’s Language Got to Do with It? New York: W.W. Norton & Company. 2005Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Shalin Hai-Jew
    • 1
  1. 1.Information Technology Services (ITS)Kansas State UniversityManhattanUSA

Personalised recommendations