Advertisement

The European Union and PSM in Troubled Democracies: A Bridge Too Far?

  • Carles LlorensEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

The chapter gives an overview of the involvement of the European Union in the domain of public service broadcasting. Carles Llorens argues that although the EU has not challenged PSM in recent years, a new conflict focused on media freedoms and PSM is brewing, especially in the case the EU’s newest members. In these countries, government threats and new laws are endangering the European PSM tradition of independence and neutrality. He argues that the issue of PSM independence is now among Europe’s most pressing issues. The chapter outlines the EU’s fight to preserve media independence in new EU Member States and the new battleground of the EU Commission since 2016. He argues that the fight could be conducted by the EU on two levels. First, exerting political pressure through the threat of applying article 7 of EU Treaty as freedom of information is a fundamental right. Second, preserving the independence of audiovisual regulators, which could be an indirect way to preserve free and independent PSM. He suggests that enacting these principles in the Audiovisual Media Service Directive could be a definitive solution in the long term.

References

  1. Ansip, A. (2017). Statement by Vice-President Ansip at the European Parliament, Strasbourg in the plenary debate: “Hate speech, populism and fake news on social media—towards an EU response”. Strasburg, 5th April 2017.Google Scholar
  2. Bardoel, J., & D’Haenens, L. (2008). Reinventing Public Service Broadcasting in Europe: Prospects, Promises and Problems. Media, Culture and Society, 30(3), 337–355. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brevini, B. (2013). Public Service Broadcasting Online: A Comparative European Policy Study of PSB 2.0. London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Centre for Media Pluralism and Media Freedom. (2017). Monitoring Media Pluralism in Europe: Application of the Media Pluralism Monitor in the European Union, Montenegro and Turkey. Available at http://dx.doi.org/10.2870/959900.
  5. Costache, A. M., & Llorens, C. (2015). A Bridge Too Far? Analysis of the European Commission’s New Developments on Media Policy and Media Freedoms Through the Concept of Soft Regulation. International Journal of Media and Cultural Politics, 11(2), 165–181. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Council of Europe. (1989). European Convention on Transfrontier Television. Strasbourg: Council of Europe. Available at https://rm.coe.int/168007b0d8.
  7. Council of Europe. (1996). Recommendation No. R (96) 10 of the Committee of Ministers to Member States on the Guarantee of the Independence of Public Service Broadcasting. Available at ttps://rm.coe.int/CoERMPublicCommonSearchServices/DisplayDCTMContent?documentId=090000168050c770.
  8. Council of Europe. (2013). The State of Media Freedom in Europe (Parliamentary Assembly). Available at http://assembly.coe.int/nw/xml/XRef/Xref-XML2HTML-en.asp?fileid=19474&lang=en. Accessed 11 April 2018.
  9. Council of Europe. (2017). Resolution 2179: Political Influence Over Independent Media and Journalists (Parliamentary Assembly). Available at http://assembly.coe.int/nw/xml/XRef/Xref-XML2HTML-en.asp?fileid=23989&lang=en.
  10. Council of the European Union. (1997). Treaty of Amsterdam, Official Journal of the European Communities. Available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199546282.013.0010.
  11. Council of the European Union. (2014, May 12). EU Human Rights Guidelines on Freedom of Expression Online and Offline FOREIGN AFFAIRS Council Meeting Brussels. Available at https://eeas.europa.eu/sites/eeas/files/eu_human_rights_guidelines_on_freedom_of_expression_online_and_offline_en.pdf.
  12. Donders, K. (2016). Public Service Media and the European Internal Market: Friends or Allies? Communications & Strategies, 101, 41–61.Google Scholar
  13. European Commission. (1999). Aid to Broadcasting Channels “Kinderkanaal” and “Phoenix”. Case No. NN70/1998. Decision 24.02.1999. Official Journal of the European Communities, C/238/1999. Google Scholar
  14. European Commission. (2000). Financing of a 24-Hour Advertising-Free News Channel with Licence Fee by BBC. Case No. NN88/1998. Decision 29.09.1999. Official Journal of the European Communities, C 078/6/2000. Google Scholar
  15. European Commission. (2008). Review of the Broadcasting Communication Summary of the Replies to the Public Consultation. Available at ec.europa.eu/competition/state_aid/reform/comments_broadcasting/summary.pdf.
  16. European Commission. (2009). Communication from the Commission on the Application of State Aid Rules to Public Service Broadcasting. Official Journal C 320, 15/11/2001 P. 0005-0011. Available at http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/ALL/?uri=CELEX:52009XC1027(01).
  17. European Commission. (2012, January 25). EC and EBU: Support for Public Media in Transformation Countries. Press Release. Brussels. Available at http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_MEMO-12-46_en.htm.
  18. European Commission. (2013a, July 16). Public Consultation on the Independence of the Audiovisual Regulatory Bodies. Consultation Results. Available at  https://ec.europa.eu/digital-single-market/en/news/public-consultation-independence-audiovisual-regulatory-bodies-read-contributions.
  19. European Commission. (2013b, June 12). Statement by the European Commission on the Closure of the Hellenic Broadcasting Corporation.Google Scholar
  20. European Commission. (2014a, October 2). EC Announces New Cooperation with European Broadcasting Union in the Neighbourhood Region. Press Release. Available at http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_IP-14-1083_en.htm. Accessed 24 February 2018.
  21. European Commission. (2014b). A New EU Framework to Strengthen the Rule of Law (COM(2014) 158 Final/2). COM (2014) 158 final/2. Available at http://collections.internetmemory.org/haeu/20171122154227/http://ec.europa.eu/justice/effective-justice/files/com_2014_158_en.pdf.
  22. European Commission. (2016). Proposal for an Audiovisual Media Services Directive. COM/2016/0287 Final—2016/0151. Available at http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:52016PC0287&from=EN.
  23. European Commission. (2018a). Media Freedom Projects|Digital Single Market. Available at https://ec.europa.eu/digital-single-market/en/media-freedom-projects. Accessed 16 April 2018.
  24. European Commission. (2018b). Directive (EU) 2018/1808 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 November 2018 amending Directive 2010/13/EU on the coordination of certain provisions laid down by law, regulation or administrative action in Member States concerning the provision of audiovisual media services (Audiovisual Media Services Directive) in view of changing market realities. Official Journal L 303, 28/11/2018 pp. 69–92. Available at https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32018L1808&from=EN.
  25. European Court of Justice. (2008). Judgment of the Court of First Instance (Fifth Chamber) of 26 June 2008. SIC—Sociedade Independente de Comunicação, SA v Commission of the European Communities. Case T-442/03.Google Scholar
  26. European Parliament. (2010). Resolution on Public Service Broadcasting in the Digital Era: The Future of the Dual System (2010/2028(INI)). Available at http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//TEXT+TA+P7-TA-2010-0438+0+DOC+XML+V0//EN&language=EN.
  27. European Parliament. (2011). Resolution on Media Law in Hungary of 10 March 2011. P7_TA(2011)0094.Google Scholar
  28. European Parliament. (2013). Resolution of 21 May 2013 on the EU Charter: Standard Settings for Media Freedom Across the EU. 2011/2246(INI). Available at http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&reference=P7-TA-2013-0203&language=EN&ring=A7-2013-0117.
  29. European Parliament (2017). Motion for a European Parliament Resolution on Media Pluralism and Media Freedom in the European Union; 2017/2209(INI).Google Scholar
  30. European Union. (2016). Directive 2010/13/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 10 March 2010 on the Coordination of Certain Provisions Laid down by Law, Regulation or Administrative Action in Member States Concerning the Provision of Audiovisual Media Services. Official Journal of the European Union, clxvii, 1–24.Google Scholar
  31. Fernández Viso, A. (2017). La Autoridad Estatal Reguladora Del Audiovisual: El Largo Camino Hacia La CNMC… y Su Incierto Futuro. In I. (Isabel) Fernández-Alonso (Ed.), Austeridad y Clientelismo (pp. 121–148). Barcelona: Gedisa.Google Scholar
  32. Flašíková Beňová, M., Moraes, C., & Sassoli, D. M. (2009). Motion for a Resolution to Wind up the Debate on the Statement by the Commission Pursuant to Rule 110(2) of the Rules of Procedure on Freedom of Information and Media Pluralism in Italy and in the European Union. Available at http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+MOTION+B7-2009-0093+0+DOC+PDF+V0//EN. Accessed 16 April 2018.
  33. Klimkiewicz, B. (2016). Between Norms and Accomplishment: Lessons for EU Media Policy from EU Enlargements. In S. Simpson, M. Puppis, & H. van den Bulck (Eds.), European Media Policy for the Twenty-First Century Assessing the Past, Setting Agendas for the Future (pp. 207–230). Routledge. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781315719597-18.
  34. Klimkiewicz, B. (2017). State, Media and Pluralism: Tracing Roots and Consequences of Media Policy Change in Poland. Publizistik, 62, 197–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Kroes, N. (2012a, June 27). A European Vision for Internet Governance. Available at http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_SPEECH-12-444_en.htm?locale=en.
  36. Kroes, N. (2012b, May 8). Defending Media Freedom, Speech/12/335. Available at http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_SPEECH-12-335_en.htm?locale=en.
  37. Lameiras, M., & Sousa, H. (2017). Portugal: Políticas de Transparencia y Reforma de Los Medios Públicos. In I. F. Alonso (Ed.), Austeridad y Clientelismo (1st ed., pp. 51–68). Barcelona: Gedisa.Google Scholar
  38. Llorens, C., & Costache, A. M. (2014). European Union Media Policy and Independent Regulatory Authorities: A New Tool to Protect European Media Pluralism? Journal of Information Policy, 4, 396–420. Available at http://dx.doi.org/10.5471/jip.v4i0.189. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. McGonagle, T. (2014). Public Service Media and Cultural Diversity: European Regulatory and Governance Frameworks. In Karina et al. (Eds.), National Conversations: Public Service Media and Cultural Diversity in Europe (pp. 45–60). Bristol (UK) & Chicago (USA): Horsti Intellect Book. Google Scholar
  40. Moe, H. (2010). Governing Public Service Broadcasting: “Public Value Tests” in Different National Contexts. Communication, Culture & Critique, 3(2), 207–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Oettinger, G. (2015, September 10). Keynote at the Public Broadcasters International Conference|European Commission. Available at https://ec.europa.eu/commission/commissioners/2014-2019/oettinger/announcements/keynote-public-broadcasters-international-conference-0_en.
  42. Oettinger, G. (2016a, January 27). A New Regulatory Framework for the Digital Single Market. Available at https://ec.europa.eu/commission/commissioners/2014-2019/oettinger/announcements/new-regulatory-framework-digital-single-market_en.
  43. Psychogiopoulou, E., Anagnostou, D., Smith, R. C., & Stolte, Y. (2017). The Freedom and Independence of Public Service Media in Europe: International Standards and Their Domestic Implementation. International Journal of Communication, 11, 1936–1955.Google Scholar
  44. Reding, V. (2007, July 9). Press Conference on the Occasion of the Conclusion of a Framework Agreement Between the International Federation of Journalists and WAZ Mediengruppe. SPEECH/07/478. Available at http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_SPEECH-07-478_en.htm?locale=en.
  45. Robillard, S. (1995). Television in Europe: Regulatory Bodies: Status, Functions and Powers in 35 European Countries. Bedfordshire, UK: University of Luton Press.Google Scholar
  46. Šimunjak, M. (2016). Monitoring Political Independence of Public Service Media: Comparative Analysis Across 19 European Union Member States. Journal of Media Business Studies, 13, 153–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Tambini, D. (2015). Five Theses on Public Media and Digitization: From a 56-Country Study. International Journal of Communication, 9, 1400–1424.Google Scholar
  48. Van den Bulck, H., & Donders, K. (2014). Analyzing European Media Policy: Stakeholders and Advocacy Coalitions. In K. Donders, C. Pauwels, & J. Loisen (Eds.), The Palgrave Handbook of European Media Policy. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  49. Vïke-Freiberga, V., Däubler-gmelin, H., Hammersley, B., & Maduro, L. M. P. P. (2013). A Free and Pluralistic Media to Sustain European Democracy. Available at https://ec.europa.eu/digital-single-market/sites/digital-agenda/files/hlg_final_report_20130121_web.pdf. Accessed 24 February 2018.

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Departament de Comunicació Audiovisual i PublicitatUniversitat Autònoma de BarcelonaBarcelonaSpain

Personalised recommendations