Advertisement

Transformation of Media in ‘In-Between’ Post-communist Societies: An Interdisciplinary Approach

  • Natalya Ryabinska
Chapter

Abstract

The problems associated with media democratization in the post-communist societies which, like Ukraine, find themselves between democracy and authoritarianism, are often presented in media studies as rooted in their past. It is believed that what hampers media reform in these countries is an (undemocratic) political culture inherited from the communist, and even pre-communist, past. However, as some findings in political science studies of post-communist transformations demonstrate, during the period of transformation, some new obstacles to democratization may arise. These obstacles often lie not in the cultural domain, but in the realm of structures and institutions. Some scholars (Ekiert et al. 2007, pp. 14–15; Ganev 2007; Kudelia 2012), for example, speak about the institutional environment which has been shaped in transformational societies in the process of regime change and which can be more constraining than enabling for the finalization of democratic reforms or for ensuring viability of new democratic regimes. In this chapter, I propose to concentrate not on inherited obstacles to media democratization, but on the environment for media independence, which had already been shaped in ‘in-between’ societies like Ukraine after the fall of previous undemocratic regimes. I pay particular attention to media-related structures and institutions, such as media laws and their associated institutional structures, as well as the structure of media ownership.

References

  1. Abrams, N., & Steven Fish, M. (2015). Policies First, Institutions Second: Lessons from Estonia’s Economic Reforms. Post-Soviet Affairs, 31(6), 491–513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Allina-Pisano, J. (2008). The Post-Soviet Potemkin Village: Politics and Property Rights in the Black Earth. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Bajomi-Lazar, P. (2015). Political Actors and the Colonization of the Media. In J. Zielonka (Ed.), Media and Politics in New Democracies: Europe in a Comparative Perspective (pp. 73–84). Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Belakova, N., & Tarlea, S. (2013). How National Parliaments Legislate the Media in CEE: The Adoption and Implementation of Media Legislation in the Czech Republic, Romania and Slovakia. A Fieldwork Report of the ERC-Funded Project on Media and Democracy in Central and Eastern Europe. Oxford. Available at https://mde.politics.ox.ac.uk/images/stories/documents/mdcee%20legislative%20report_ro-cz-sk_pv.pdf.
  5. Belyakov, A. (2009). ‘Censorship By Money’ on Freedom of Speech in Ukraine. Critique, 37(4), 601–617.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Berglund, S., & Ekman, J. (2013). The Diversity of Political Regimes. In S. Berglund, J. Ekman, K. Deegan-Krause, & T. Knutsen (Eds.), Handbook of Political Change in Eastern Europe (pp. 1–13). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Böröcz, J. (2000). Informality Rules. East European Politics and Societies, 14(2), 348–380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Carothers, T. (2002). The End of the Transition Paradigm. Journal of Democracy, 13(1), 5–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Carothers, T. (2007). The ‘Sequencing’ Fallacy. Journal of Democracy, 18(1), 12–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Carothers, T., & Samet-Marram, O. (2015). The New Global Marketplace of Political Change. Washington, DC: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.Google Scholar
  11. Collins, K. (2006). Clan Politics and Regime Transition in Central Asia. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Curran, J., & Park, M.-J. (2000). Introduction. In J. Curran & M.-J. Park (Eds.), De-Westernizing Media Studies (pp. 2–15). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  13. D’Anieri, P. (2007). Understanding Ukrainian Politics: Power, Politics and Institutional Design. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.Google Scholar
  14. Darden, K. A. (2001). Blackmail as a Tool of State Domination: Ukraine Under Kuchma. East European Constitutional Review, 10, 67–71.Google Scholar
  15. Darden, K. A. (2002). Graft and Governance: Corruption as an Informal Mechanism of State Control. Leitner Program Working Papers, 2. http://www.yale.net/leitner/resources/docs/2002-02.pdf. Accessed 25 August 2014.
  16. Darden, K. A. (2008). The Integrity of Corrupt States: Graft as an Informal State Institution. Politics & Society, 36(1), 35–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Dutsyk, D. (2010). Media Ownership Structure in Ukraine: Political Aspects. In O. Khabyuk & M. Kops (Eds.), Public Service Broadcasting: A German–Ukrainian Exchange of Opinions. Results of the Conference on October 20, 2010 in Cologne, Germany (pp. 29–40). http://rundfunkoek.uni-koeln.de/institut/tagungen/2010-Cologne/Dutsyk_e.pdf. Accessed 14 August 2013.
  18. Ekiert, G., Kubik, J., & Vachudova, M. (2007). Democracy in the Post-communist World: An Unending Quest? East European Politics and Societies, 21(1), 7–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. EBRD (European Bank for Reconstruction and Development). (1999). Transition Report. London: EBRD. Google Scholar
  20. EU-Ukraine. (2012). Viktoriya Siumar: Freedom of Speech in Ukraine 2010–2012: The Main Trends. EU-Ukraine. www.eu-ukraine.org/2012/05/viktoriya-siumar-freedom-ofspeech-in-ukraine-2010-2012-the-main-trends. Accessed 19 May 2013.
  21. Fortin, J. (2012). Is There a Necessary Condition for Democracy? The Role of State Capacity in Postcommunist Countries. Comparative Political Studies, 45(7), 903–930.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Freedom House. (2015). Freedom of the Press-2015. https://freedomhouse.org/report/freedom-press/2015/ukraine. Accessed 30 September 2017.
  23. Freedom House. (2016). Freedom of the Press-2016. https://freedomhouse.org/report/freedom-press/2016/ukraine. Accessed 30 September 2017.
  24. Fritz, V. (2007). State-Building: A Comparative Study of Ukraine‚ Lithuania, Belarus and Russia. Budapest: Central European University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Fukuyama, F. (2004). The Imperative of State-Building. Journal of Democracy, 15(2), 17–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Fukuyama, F. (2007). Liberalism Versus State-Building. Journal of Democracy, 18(3), 10–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Fukuyama, F. (2015). Why Is Democracy Performing so Poorly? Journal of Democracy, 26(1), 11–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Ganev, V. (2007). Preying on the State: The Transformation of Bulgaria After 1989. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Gel’man, V. (2003). Post-Soviet Transitions and Democratization: Towards Theory Building. Democratization, 10(2), 87–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Gel’man, V. (2004). The Unrule of Law in the Making: The Politics of Informal Institution-Building in Russia. Europe-Asia Studies, 56(7), 1021–1040.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Gel’man, V. (2012). Subversive Institutions, Informal Governance, and Contemporary Russian Politics. Communist and Post-communist Studies, 45(3), 295–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Gross, P. (2002). Entangled Evolutions: Media and Democratization in Eastern Europe. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  33. Group of States Against Corruption (GRECO) Report. (2013, March). Third Addendum to the Compliance Report on Ukraine, GRECO, 18–22. https://www.coe.int/t/dghl/monitoring/greco/evaluations/round2/grecorC1&2(2009)1_thirdadd_ukraine_en.pdf. Accessed 16 August 2018.
  34. Grzymala-Busse, A. (2004). Post-communist Competition and State Development. Program on Central & Eastern Europe Working Paper Series#59.Google Scholar
  35. Grzymala-Busse, A. (2007). Rebuilding Leviathan: Party Competition and State Exploitation in Post-communist Democracies. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Grzymala-Busse, A. (2008). Beyond Clientelism: Incumbent State Capture and State Formation. Comparative Political Studies, 41, 638–673.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Grzymala-Busse, A. (2010). The Best Laid Plans: The Impact of Informal Rules on Formal Institutions in Transitional Regimes. Studies in Comparative International Development, 45(3), 311–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Grzymala-Busse, A., & Luong, P. J. (2002). Reconceptualizing the State: Lessons from Post-communism. Politics & Society, 30(4), 529–554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Hale, H. (2011). Formal Constitutions in Informal Politics: Institutions and Democratization in Post-Soviet Eurasia. World Politics, 63(4), 581–617.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Hallin, D. C., & Mancini, P. (2012). Comparing Media Systems Between Eastern and Western Europe. In P. Gross & K. Jakubowicz (Eds.), Media Transformations in the Post-communist World: Eastern Europe’s Tortured Path to Change (pp. 15–32). Lanham: Lexington.Google Scholar
  41. Hayoz, N., & Gallina, N. (2011). Beyond Democracy: The Relevance of Informal Power in Eastern Europe. In N. Hayoz & L. Jesien (Eds.), 1989 in Central and Eastern Europe: Implications and Meanings Twenty Years Later. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  42. Hellman, J. (1998). Winners Take All: The Politics of Partial Reform in Postcommunist Nations. World Politics, 50, 203–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Hellman, J., & Kaufmann, D. (2001). Confronting the Challenge of State Capture in Transition Economies. Finance and Development, 38(3), 31–35.Google Scholar
  44. Helmke, G., & Levitsky, S. (2004). Informal Institutions and Comparative Politics: A Research Agenda. Perspectives on Politics, 2(4), 725–740.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Helmke, G., & Levitsky, S. (2006). Conclusion. In Informal Institutions and Democracy: Lessons from Latin America. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  46. Hrvatin, S., & Petković, B. (2004). Regional Overview. In S. Hrvatin & B. Petković (Eds.), Media Ownership and Its Impact on Media Independence and Pluralism (pp. 10–38). Ljubljana: SEENMP and Peace Institute.Google Scholar
  47. IMI (Institute of Mass Information). (2014, January 29). Zvit z monitoring dzhynsy ta nenalezhnogo markuvannia. Gruden’ 2014 roku ta pidsumky roku [Dzhynsa Monitoring Report. December 2014 and Results for the Year 2014]. IMI. http://imi.org.ua/monitorings/zvit-z-monitoringu-djinsi-ta-nenalejnogo-markuvannya-gruden-2014-roku-ta-pidsumki-roku/. Accessed 18 July 2018.
  48. Jakubowicz, K. (2005). Post-communist Media Development in Perspective. In Internationale Politikanalyse. Berlin: Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung.Google Scholar
  49. Koltsova, O. (2006). News Media and Power in Russia. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Krygier, M. (2015). Good, Bad, and ‘Irritant’ Laws in New Democracies. In J. Zielonka (Ed.), Media and Politics in New Democracies: Europe in a Comparative Perspective (pp. 119–136). Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Kudelia, S. (2012). The Sources of Continuity and Change of Ukraine’s Incomplete State. Communist and Post-communist Studies, 45(3), 417–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Lauth, H.-J. (2000). Informal Institutions and Democracy. Democratization, 7(4), 21–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Ledevena, A. (2006). How Russia Really Works: The Informal Practices That Shaped Post-Soviet Politics and Business. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  54. Ledeneva, A. (2009). From Russia with “Blat”: Can Informal Networks Help Modernize Russia? Social Research, 76(11), 257–288.Google Scholar
  55. Ligachova, N. (2008, March 26). Nekotoryie voprosy dzinsovedeniia [Some Issues of Dzhynsa Making]. Telekrytyka. www.telekritika.ua/media-continent/authorcolumn/nl/2008-03-26/37372. Accessed 14 August 2013.
  56. Malygina, K. (2010). Ukraine as a Neo-poatrimonial State: Understanding Political Change in Ukraine in 2005–2010. Southeast Europe Review for Labour and Social Affairs, 13(1), 7–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Mancini, P. (2015). The News Media Between Volatility and Hybridization. In J. Zielonka (Ed.), Media and Politics in New Democracies: Europe in a Comparative Perspective (pp. 25–37). Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Mansfield, E. D., & Snyder, J. (2005). Electing to Fight: Why Emerging Democracies Go to War. Cambridge: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Mediasapiens. (2012, September 6). Vdaleke ot tsivilizatsii [Away from Civilization]. Mediasapiens. http://osvita.mediasapiens.ua/material/9967. Accessed 14 August 2013.
  60. Mediasapiens. (2016, August 26). Politychna “dzhynsa” zalyshaiet’sia naipopularnishym zhanrom u regionalnykh ZMI [Political “dzhynsa” Remains the Most Popular Genre in Local Media]. Mediasapiens. http://osvita.mediasapiens.ua/monitoring/regional_newspapers/politichna_dzhinsa_lishaetsya_naypopulyarnishim_zhanrom_u_regionalnikh_zmi/. Accessed 2 February 2018.
  61. Meyer, G. (Ed.). (2008). Formal Institutions and Informal Politics in Central and Eastern Europe: Hungary, Poland, Russia and Ukraine. Opladen and Farmington Hills: Barbara Budrich Publishers.Google Scholar
  62. MSI-Ukraine. (2008). IREX. Media Sustainability Index (MSI), Europe and Eurasia: Ukraine. http://www.irex.org/projects/msi/europe-eurasia. Accessed 18 July 2018.
  63. Mungiu-Pippidi, A. (2008). How Media and Politics Shape Each Other in the New Europe. In K. Jakubowicz & M. Sükösd (Eds.), Finding the Right Place on the Map: Central and Eastern European Media Change in a Global Perspective (pp. 87–100). Bristol, UK and Chicago, IL: Intellect.Google Scholar
  64. O’Donnell, G. A. (1996). Illusions About Consolidation. Journal of Democracy, 7(2), 34–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Pfetsch, B., & Voltmer, K. (2012). Negotiating Control: Political Communication Cultures in Bulgaria and Poland. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 17(4), 388–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Popova, M. (2016). Ukraine’s Politicized Courts. In H. Hale & R. Orttug (Eds.), Beyond the Euromaidan: Comparative Perspectives on Advancing Reform in Ukraine (pp. 143–161). Stanford, California: Stanford University Press. Google Scholar
  67. Price, M., & Krug, P. (2002). The Enabling Environment for Free and Independent Media: Contribution to Transparent and Accountable Governance. Occasional Papers Series. Washington, DC: US Agency for International Development, Office of Democracy and Governance.Google Scholar
  68. Rantanen, T., & Belakova, N. (2015). Why It Is Important to Study Media and Politics in New Democracies? In J. Zielonka (Ed.), Media and Politics in New Democracies: Europe in a Comparative Perspective (pp. 305–320). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  69. Richter, A. (2002). The Partial Transition: Ukraine’s Post-communist Media. In M. Price, B. Rozumilowicz, & S. Verhulst (Eds.), Media Reform: Democratizing the Media, Democratizing the State (pp. 133–154). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  70. Richter, A. (2008). Post-Soviet Perspective on Censorship and Freedom of the Media: An Overview. International Communication Gazette, 70(5), 307–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Ryabinska, N. (2011). The Media Market and Media Ownership in Post-communist Ukraine. Problems of Post-communism, 58(6), 3–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Ryabinska, N. (2017). Ukraine’s Post-communist Mass Media: Between Capture and Commercialization. Stuttgart: ibidem-Verlag.Google Scholar
  73. Sokolenko, N. (2013, April 3). Parketni novyny ta loialnist do vlady zamist standartiv [Pro-government Articles and Loyalty to the Authorities Instead of Journalism Standards]. Mediasapiens. http://osvita.mediasapiens.ua/monitoring/regional_news/parketni_novini_ta_loyalnist_do_vladi_zamist_standartiv/. Accessed 4 April 2015.
  74. Sparks, C., & Reading, A. (1998). Communism, Capitalism, and the Mass Media. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  75. Tsetsura, K., & Grynko, A. (2009). An Exploratory Study of the Media Transparency in Ukraine. Public Relations Journal, 3(2). www.prsa.org/prjournal/Vol3No2/6D-030205.pdf. Accessed 2 April 2015.
  76. Ukraine Reform Monitor// Carnegie Endowment for International Peace (2017, April). http://carnegieendowment.org/2017/04/19/ukraine-reform-monitor-april-2017-pub-68700. Accessed 16 July 2018.
  77. unian.ua. (2010, March 24). Zakon, ‘Pro zakhyst suspilnoii morali’ potrebuye znachnoii korekciii [The Law ‘On the Protection of Public Morality’ Requires Significant Correction]. unian.ua. http://unian.net/ukr/news/news-368994.html. Accessed 2 April 2015.
  78. Vartanova, E. (2012). The Russian Media Model in the Context of Post-Soviet Dynamics. In D. Hallin & P. Mancini (Eds.), Comparing Media Systems Beyond the Western World (pp. 119–142). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  79. World Bank. (2000). Anticorruption in Transition: A Contribution to the Policy Debate. Washington, DC: The World Bank.Google Scholar
  80. World Bank. (2011). Trends in Corruption and Regulatory Burden in Eastern Europe and Central Asia: A World Bank Study. Washington, DC: The World Bank.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Zimmer, K. (2008). Formal Institutions and Informal Politics in Ukraine. In G. Meyer (Ed.), Formal Institutions and Informal Politics in Central and Eastern Europe: Hungary, Poland, Russia and Ukraine (pp. 267–303). Opladen and Farmington Hills: Barbara Budrich.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Natalya Ryabinska
    • 1
  1. 1.Collegium CivitasWarsawPoland

Personalised recommendations