Rethinking Interculturalism Using Digital Tools

  • Julie HolledgeEmail author
  • Sarah Thomasson
  • Joanne Tompkins
Part of the Contemporary Performance InterActions book series (CPI)


This chapter returns to interculturalism to examine changes that have occurred in this theatrical practice in the two decades since the publication of Women’s Intercultural Performance. Research methods have also altered because of shifts in cultural and political contexts, and the availability of new research tools. Our “close-up” studies of women’s intercultural performance practice have given way to a “distant reading” based on quantitative analyses that deliver qualitative interpretations of the social, political, and economic forces that facilitate or block cultural transmission at a transnational level. Using AusStage, the Australian database for the performing arts, we have interrogated an AusStage festival subset to reveal that the nature and location of interculturalism in Australia has changed markedly, and disappointingly, that women play ever-more limited roles in this Australian market. We situate this re-evaluation of intercultural performance practice against global forces and national positions—specifically cultural diplomacy—and articulate disjunctions we have uncovered. Using quantitative analyses as the basis of qualitative interpretations has allowed us to contextualize our earlier study by reflecting on a broader time span, thus enriching the close-up methodology that produced Women’s Intercultural Performance.

Works Cited

  1. Alway, Lesley. 2013. Not Without Irony: Is Asia the New Cultural Policy Moment? Asia Pacific Journal of Arts and Cultural Management 10 (1): 55–63.Google Scholar
  2. Anderson, Zoe. 2013. Reading ‘Multiculturalism’: A Historiography of Policy and Ideal in Australia. History Compass 11: 905–917.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ang, Ien, Yudhishthir Raj Isar, and Phillip Mar. 2015. Cultural Diplomacy: Beyond the National Interest? International Journal of Cultural Policy 21 (4): 365–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Australia Council. 2014–19. A Culturally Ambitious Nation: Strategic Plan. Surry Hills: Australia Council for the Arts.Google Scholar
  5. Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS). 2012–13. 2071.0 Reflecting a Nation: Stories from the 2011 Census. Australian Bureau of Statistics.
  6. Darwin Festival. 2017. About Us. Darwin Festival. Accessed 17 Jan 2018.
  7. Department of Communication and the Arts. 1994. Creative Nation: Commonwealth Cultural Policy. Analysis and Policy Observatory. October 30.
  8. Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade (DFAT). 2016. Public Diplomacy Strategy 2014–16. Public Diplomacy, May 2016.
  9. ———. 2017a. Australian Cultural Diplomacy Program. Australian Cultural Diplomacy Grants Program. Accessed 20 Dec 2017.
  10. ———. 2017b. Australia’s Top 10 Two-Way Trading Partners. Australia’s Trade at a Glance. Accessed 23 Jan 2018.
  11. Freedland, Jonathan. 2017. The ‘Peaceful’ Decade that Set-Up Our Current Turmoil. Guardian, April 22.
  12. Government of Australia. 2013. Creative Australia: National Cultural Policy. Analysis and Policy Observatory. March 13.
  13. Holledge, Julie, and Joanne Tompkins. 2000. Women’s Intercultural Performance. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  14. Khan, Rimi, Danielle Wyatt, Audrey Yue, and Nikos Papastergiadis. 2013. Creative Australia and the Dispersal of Multiculturalism. Asia Pacific Journal of Arts and Cultural Management 10 (1): 25–34.Google Scholar
  15. Knowles, Ric. 2000. The Edinburgh Festival and Fringe: Lessons for Canada? Canadian Theatre Review 102: 88–96.Google Scholar
  16. Moretti, Franco. 2013. Distant Reading. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  17. Nye, Joseph S. 1990. Bound to Lead: The Changing Nature of American Power. New York: Basic.Google Scholar
  18. ———. 2004. Soft Power: The Means to Success in World Politics. New York: Public Affairs.Google Scholar
  19. OzAsia Festival. 2017. About. OzAsia Festival. Accessed 17 Jan 2018.
  20. Thomasson, Sarah. 2015. “Producing the Festival City: Place Myths and the Festivals of Adelaide and Edinburgh.” PhD dissertation, Queen Mary University of London.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Julie Holledge
    • 1
    Email author
  • Sarah Thomasson
    • 2
  • Joanne Tompkins
    • 3
  1. 1.Flinders UniversityAdelaideAustralia
  2. 2.School of English, Film, Theatre, and Media StudiesVictoria University of WellingtonWellingtonNew Zealand
  3. 3.School of Communication and ArtsThe University of QueenslandBrisbaneAustralia

Personalised recommendations