Advertisement

How to Interprete Early Recordings? Artefacts and Resonances in Recording and Reproduction of Singing Voices

  • Malte KobEmail author
  • Tobias A. Weege
Chapter
Part of the Current Research in Systematic Musicology book series (CRSM, volume 5)

Abstract

Voice recordings in the beginning of the 20th century required a complex acoustic and mechanical set-up for transfer of the singing voice sound from singer via horns, ducts, soundbox and needle to a cylinder or disc. A similar construction was used to reproduce the voice. Both signal paths had significant impact on various properties of the voice signals—mostly the voice signal quality was reduced and distortions were produced. Another effect were changes in details of the voice spectrum due to the interaction of resonances in the voice signal and the transfer paths of recording and reproduction devices. We present analyses of the voice signal modifications and relate them to parts of the devices. This work is funded by the German Research Foundation.

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the German Research Foundation (DFG—project number 289601849) for funding this work. As well as the Detmold University of Music and the Paderborn University for the institutional support. Our deep gratitude to George Brock-Nannestad for lending the recording horn replica and for technical advice. The singers Doris Maria Ritter and Boris A. Bolles are acknowledged for the contributions of their voices to the investigations.

References

  1. 1.
    Brock-Nannestad G (1981) Zur Entwicklung einer Quellenkritik bei Schallplattenaufnahmen. Musica 35:76–81Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Brock-Nannestad G (1997) The objective basis for the production of high quality transfers from pre-1925 sound recordings. In: Audio engineering society convention, vol 103Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Copeland P (2008) Manual of analogue sound restoration techniques. The British LibraryGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Dromey C, Carter N, Hopkin A (2003) Vibrato rate adjustment. J Voice 17(2):168–178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hähnel T (2018) Über die Quantifizierung des Heldentenors. Vibrato, Ornamentik, Glissando, Tempo und Register in akustischen Tonaufnahmen zwischen 1900 und 1925. In: Beiträge zur Tagung der Gesellschaft für Musikforschung. Oldenburg (2018) (Accepted talk and paper)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ifukube T, Kawashima T, Asakura T (1989) New methods of sound reproduction from old wax phonograph cylinders. JASA 85(4):1759–1766CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Iwai T, Asakura T, Ifukube T, Kawashima T (1986) Reproduction of sound from old wax phonograph cylinders using the laser-beam reflection method. Appl Opt 25(5):597–604CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Katz M (1999) The phonograph effect: the influence of recording on listener, performer, composer, 1900–1940. PhD thesis, University of MichiganGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Katz M (2006) Portamento and the phonograph effect. J Musicol Res 25(3–4):211–232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kob M, Amengual Garí SV, Bolles BA, Ritter DM, Pirch P (2018) Influence of early recording and playing devices on voice sounds: modification of singing voice formants. In: Fortschritte der Akustik - DAGA 2018, pp 1703–1706Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kob M, Henrich N, Herzel H, Howard D, Tokuda I, Wolfe J (2011) Analysing and understanding the singing voice: recent progress and open questions. Curr Bioinform 362–374CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kolkowski A, Miller D, Blier-Carruthers A (2015) The art and science of acoustic recording: re-enacting Arthur Nikisch and the Berlin Philharmonic Orchestra’s landmark 1913 recording of Beethoven’s Fifth Symphony. Sci Museum Group JGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Martensen K, Zakharchuk P, Kob M, Grotjahn R (2015) Phonograph und Gesangsstimme: Untersuchungen zur Akustik früher Aufzeichnungs- und Abspielgeräte. In: Fortschritte der Akustik - DAGA 2015, pp 1429–1432Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Maxfield JP, Harrison HC (1926) Methods of high quality recording and reproducing of music and speech based on telephone research. Bell Syst Tech J 5(3):493–523CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Pirch P (2015) On the use and acoustical characteristics of mechanically augmented musical instruments and early recording devices. Master’s thesis, Detmold University of MusicGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Sagers JD, McNeese AR, Lenhart RD, Wilson PS (2012) Analysis of a homemade Edison tinfoil phonograph. JASA 132(4):2173–2183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Sundberg J (1974) Articulatory interpretation of the singing formant. J Acoust Soc Am 55:838–844CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Weege TA, Habasinska D, Kob M (2018) Influence of early recording and playing devices on musical sound: FRF measurements of horn, soundbox and tonearm. In: Fortschritte der Akustik - DAGA 2018, pp 1707–1710Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Welch W, Burt L (1994) From tinfoil to stereo: the acoustic years of the recording industry, 1877–1929. University Press of FloridaGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Wilson P, Webb GW (1929) Modern gramophones and electrical reproducers. Cassel and Company, LtdGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Detmold University of MusicDetmoldGermany

Personalised recommendations