Advertisement

Dissecting Article 26 of the 2005 Council of Europe Convention

  • Julia Maria Muraszkiewicz
Chapter
Part of the Palgrave Studies in Victims and Victimology book series (PSVV)

Abstract

There is no shortage of victim rights advocates amongst scholars and NGOs defining how best to offer trafficked persons a holistic protection mechanism. Yet legislations, particularly regional ones, balance such recommendations with state sovereignty and diverse legal traditions and practices.

References

  1. Amnesty International and Anti-slavery. (2005). Council of Europe: Don’t Compromise on the Rights of Trafficked Persons [Online]. https://www.amnesty.org/download/Documents/80000/act840052005en.pdf.
  2. Burchell, J. (2011). South Africa. In K. J. Heller & M. D. Dubber (Eds.), The Handbook of Comparative Criminal Law. Stanford, CA: Stanford Law Books.Google Scholar
  3. Council of Europe. (2005). Explanatory Report on the Convention on Action Against Trafficking in Human Beings, ETS 197, 16 May 2005.Google Scholar
  4. Elliott, J. (2015). Victims or Criminals: The Example of Human Trafficking in the United Kingdom. In M. J. Guia (Ed.), The Illegal Business of Human Trafficking. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.Google Scholar
  5. European Commission. (2012). Ad-hoc Query on Transposition of Article 8 of Directive 2011/36/EU [Online]. http://emn.ee/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/433_emn_ad-hoc_query_on_transposition_of_article_8_of_directive_2011-36_widerd_en.pdf.
  6. EU Observer. (2016). Child Trafficking in EU on the Rise [Online]. https://euobserver.com/justice/133482.
  7. Gallagher, A. (2009). Human Rights and Human Trafficking: Quagmire or Firm Ground? A response to James Hathaway. Virginia Journal of International Law, 49(4), 789–848.Google Scholar
  8. Hirsch Ballin, M. F. H. (2012). Anticipative Criminal Investigation: Theory and Counterterrorism Practice in the Netherlands and the United States. The Hague: Asser Press.Google Scholar
  9. Hoshi, B. (2013). The Trafficking Defence: A Proposed Model for the Non-criminalisation of Trafficked Persons in International Law. Copyright Groningen Journal of International Law, 1(2), 54–72. Google Scholar
  10. Jehle, J.-M., Wade, M., Aubusson de Cavarlay, B., & Fritz Thyssen-Stiftung. (2006). Coping with Overloaded Criminal Justice Systems: The Rise of Prosecutorial Power Across Europe. Berlin and Heidelberg: Springer.Google Scholar
  11. Jörg-Martin, J. (2006). The Function of Public Prosecution within the Criminal Justice System Aim, Approach and Outcome of a European Comparative Study. In J. Jörg-Martin & M. Wade. (Eds.), Coping with Overloaded Criminal Justice Systems. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  12. Kyprianou, D. (2010). The Role of the Cyprus Attorney General’s Office in Prosecutions: Rhetoric, Ideology and Practice. Berlin and Heidelberg: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Lasocik, Z. (2013). Niekaralność ofiar handle ludźmi – wstepna diagnoza problem. Warsaw: Warsaw University.Google Scholar
  14. Leiser, B. M. (2008). On Coercion. In D. Reidy & W. Riker (Eds.), Coercion and the State. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  15. OHCHR. (2010). Recommended Principles and Guidelines on Human Rights and Human Trafficking. Geneva: OHCHR [Online]. http://www.ohchr.org/Documents/Publications/Traffickingen.pdf.
  16. OSCE Office of the Special Representative and Co-ordinator for Combating Trafficking in Human Beings. (2013). Policy and Legislative Recommendations Towards the Effective Implementation of the Non-punishment Provision with Regard to Victims of Trafficking. Vienna [Online]. http://www.osce.org/secretariat/101002?download=true.
  17. Piotrowicz, R. W., & Sorrentino, L. (2016). Human Trafficking and the Emergence of the Non-punishment Principle. Human Rights Law Review, 16(4), 669–699.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Sanders, A. (1996). Introduction. In A. Sanders (Ed.), Prosecution in Common Law Jurisdictions. Aldershot: Dartmouth.Google Scholar
  19. Schloenhardt, A., & Markey-Towler, R. (2016). Non-criminalisation of Victims of Trafficking in Persons—Principles, Promises and Perspectives. Groningen Journal of International Law, 4(1), 10–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Stoyanova, V. (2015). Human Trafficking and Slavery Reconsidered: Conceptual Limits and States’ Positive Obligations. Lund: Lund University.Google Scholar
  21. Tak, J. P. (Date Unknown). Methods of Diversion Used by the Prosecution Services in the Netherlands and Other Western European Countries [Online] http://www.unafei.or.jp/english/pdf/RS_No74/No74_07VE_Tak.pdf.
  22. The Law Society. (2015). Criminal Prosecutions of Victims of Trafficking [Online]. http://www.lawsociety.org.uk/support-services/advice/practice-notes/criminal-prosecutions-of-victims-of-trafficking/.
  23. United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF). (2006). Guidelines on the Protection of Child Victims of Trafficking [Online]. http://www.unicef.org/ceecis/0610-Unicef_Victims_Guidelines_en.pdf.
  24. United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC). (2009). Trafficking in Persons [Online]. http://www.unodc.org/documents/human-trafficking/HTleafletA5EnglishupdatedAugust09.pdf.
  25. Van der Rijt, J.-W. (2012). The Importance of Assent. Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Julia Maria Muraszkiewicz
    • 1
  1. 1.Trilateral Research & ConsultingLondonUK

Personalised recommendations